Dir. Commentary

I haven't seen the commentary. Does it offer any new insight? Does Soderbergh clarify the "orgasm" remark or does he just think it is obvious? Does he know some people take it to mean that Graham is not impotent, merely celibate? That is not how I interpret it, btw.

What about the bit about Graham's money? I liked the suggestion made on this board that his mental health status meant he was receiving disability-related benefits for that, although I still think there is a case to be made for my "trust fund" theory.