Who saw this in cinemas back in 89?


Who saw this back in the day? What were your memories - the anticipation of seeing it in the weeks/days before, the actually seeing it and how much a big deal was it where you were back then, the crowds, audience etc and after coming out of the cinema what were your thoughts and in the days/weeks that followed….


i was so hyped for it after IV (still a kid) and remember seeing segments of the trailer on tv and the coming soon quad poster outside the cinema way before it opened and wondering what the story could behttp://www.filmonpaper.com/site/media/2011/03/StarTrekV_quad-1-500x375.jpg

UK didn't get it until the October so just as well there was no internet back then otherwise everyone would've already known the plot inside out! very easy to avoid spoilers back then lol (then again I remember seeing a guy in a clothes store showing a comic off to his mate and I saw it was the DC Star Trek V comic and I went on a hunt around town looking for it (why didnt I just ask the guy where he got it? I was probably too scared lol) eventually found it (either that day or a week later) in a newsagent that sold loads of American comics (this was before the town had its own SF comic store) I cant remember if I was able to resist reading the comic or not..

anyway when I saw it opening night i remember thinking something wasnt quite right. the FX werent as good as the previous ones, plus it was too jokey (ok IV was basically a comedy but it was funny...not desperate like the gags in this). and the end felt very rushed. even as a kid when you think every movie you see at cinema is awesome i could tell it didnt click. but i still bought the starlog movie magazine, DC comic and novel(which both had expanded scenes, rock man ending). as well as Shatners account of making the movie book (also remember seeing these big action figures of Kirk,Spock, Bones and sybok but they were out of my price range)

reply

The only Trek movie I walked out on -- the Spock birth scene had me running for the exits faster than if someone had yelled fire.

"IMDb...you will never find a more wretched hive of trolls and douchebaggery"

reply

I saw it back in the day. This is the worst Star Trek movie that has ever been made. The film gets worse as it goes along. At the film's end, much of audience, booed. When I exited the theater, I felt numb. The thing looked like a Bialystock & Bloom production.

reply

. The thing looked like a Max Bialystock production


:D Made me laugh.

reply

I went in with high expectations: TVH was enjoyable and we finally had Captain Kirk back commanding the Enterprise. What could go wrong?

I was pretty disappointed when I left. Over the years, I've come to understand what went wrong, but it doesn't lessen the fact that this is not a great movie.

"Live long and suck it, Zachary Quinto!"

reply

I remember it seeming silly but it was very predictable and seemed like the tv show not a trek film. After the movie i was a little disappointed but it wasnt that bad. In future years i actually grew to like it. The motion picture was way worse in my opinion.

reply

I saw it new but at a drive in as opposed to a theater. It was shown after Indiana Jones & The Last Crusade. I remember it being a surprise because I thought we were only seeing Indy. I was 8. So it was basically the coolest thing in the world. Haha. I liked it at the time simply because it was Star Trek. My parents must not have totally hated it because we didn't leave till it was over.

reply

I didn't get to see it in theatres but I remember watching it for the first time when it came out to rent. It had just come out to VHS and my parents rented it. I was 9 years and loved it. I remember liking it so much that I made a sequel with my old Galoob TNG action figures. They went back through the barrier and discovered the God creature still alive! Lol. When I learned later that it wasn't well received, I remember being surprised. Of course I can see the flaws now, but I still think its a great flick.

reply

Penhall99 you have a lot of nostalgia for the film, and there is nothing wrong with that. I too have nostalgia that helps me to still enjoy films from my own childhood that I know are otherwise not too good. With that said, Trek V still has some good content in it even if the whole package wasn't what it could have been. If anything, it showcases the three-way friendship between Kirk, Spock, and McCoy better than any other of the six films.

I was 19 when Trek V came to theaters. I was excited, as I loved the Trek movies, yet I detected some problems with this one from the trailers alone. It was bad enough that months earlier, Paramount had released this stupid teaser poster at theaters (http://johneaves.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/star_trek_v_ver1.jpg) which was pretty lame and threatened to turn the film into an action flick, but the trailers were showing some seriously piss-poor looking visual effects. One of the late night shows at the time had William Shatner as a guest, and they showed a clip of the scene where they are in the shuttle and the Bird of Prey decloaks, leading to the shuttle crash. I marveled at how bad it looked, how goofy the Klingons were, etc. Reading about the search for God plot wasn't very exciting to me either, as that can be a touchy subject that is nearly impossible to handle properly. Everything I saw about this film before release seemed to be pointing at it being bad, but as a Trek fan, I held out hope that it would be good anyhow.

All of my concerns were proven correct, as the film we got tried hard but failed to be a good action flick, had terrible visual effects, and handled the God plot pretty poorly. Making matters worse was the out of place comedy, as well as the fact that the film had weird character moments (Scotty and Uhura) that take you out of the film, as well as flat out stupid moments such as the Enterprise have seventy decks. And jet boots, lets not forget the jet boots. The movie was very lazily written and filmed. I was terribly disappointed, and I do recall some people walking out around the time that the cast arrived to Shakaree and met God.

I saw it a second time during a special showing of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade/Star Trek V double feature! As much as I hated the execution of the film, I didn't hate the movie. Aside from being disappointed, I still found things to enjoy such as Goldsmith's score, McCoy's pain scene, Lawrence Luckinbill as Sybok, etc. But still, initial reaction was extensive disappointment and a feeling of being heart-sick.

- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

reply

The problem was with things like McCoy's pain scene, is that it's not something people want to see on the big screen, especially in Star Trek.

The visual effects were bad because Industrial Light and Magic wasn't available to do the effects, prior commitments kept ILM away, like Ghostbusters II. The effects firm they hired wasn't a bad firm, but they had two obstacles fighting them, an impossible deadline to meet to finish the effects, and an even more impossible director to deal with -- Shatner.

But the visuals were the least of Star Trek V's problems, the story was the main problem, it just wasn't a good story for the big screen, in fact, some parts weren't even fit for the small screen.

From what I understand, all the problems with this movie were caused by Shatner's failure as a director, he should never have been allowed anywhere near the director's chair.

And it was funny, because after the low point of Star Trek V, it was Nicholas Meyer to the rescue once again. Although, I think Star Trek V put Trek at a much lower level than TMP did.

"IMDb...you will never find a more wretched hive of trolls and douchebaggery"

reply

[deleted]

You're really blaming Shatner, with all the studio interference he dealt with and his budget being slashed completely?? That company was *not* a good company either..... but really, other then the end of the movie, the FX weren't that bad; a lot of good old fashioned stunts on the planet, the shuttlebay scene... it definitely felt like TOS, thats for sure.

V was not nearly as badly received at the time. This retroactive hate is getting a bit out of hand.

reply

The rocket boots and Deck 78...and nobody thought to tell Shatner "No"?

"Live long and suck it, Zachary Quinto!"

reply

I saw it at the drive-in with my girlfriend and bunch of other friends from high school (probably 8 to 10 people all together). I think my best friend and his girlfriend (who was also my girlfriend's best friend) had just broken up and they were both there which was a bit awkward and kind of cast a shadow over the whole thing. I remember being very disappointed in the movie and wishing I could just stop watching it and make out with my girlfriend LOL.

I don't think any of us thought it was very good. I remember being afraid it would kill the series.

reply

bozo_500, I saw it in theatres in Sydney, Australia in 1989.

It only lasted a few short weeks before it was removed from theatres. But this just seemed to happen to Trek films in the 1980s (it happened to Trek 3 I know that much).

Star Trek TNG may of began in 1987 but it was ABOUT 1990 before Aussie TV aired it. So I don't think Trek had a HUGE Down Under following in the 1980s? The following got bigger in the 1990s.

As for Trek 5 itself, I loved it and made about 5 repeat cinema viewings of it. I loved everything about the film and I totally ignored the negative reviews of it.

reply

I saw it shortly after it was released. With it following up the (IMHO) great ST II-IV trilogy, and NextGen riding high on TV, how could I not be fired up?!

lol, unfortunately, it turned out to not be as good as I'd hoped. I knew things might get bumpy when the movie franchise took back their The Motion Picture theme music, which was then being used by the popular NextGen TV series. But as the film progressed, with the forced corny comedy and half-baked script, well...
From that point forward, with better Trek all over the TV syndication dial to follow shortly after this film, I'd only occasionally go catch a ST movie.

reply

[deleted]

This..... although I wouldn't have minded more of the II-III score worked in for the rest of the TOS movies, if TNG *had* to have TMP score.

reply