A MATTER OF OPINION


I remember reading about the Profumo Affair in the DAILY TELEGRAPH at the time of the events. My father was appalled at the reception Mandy Rice Davies received when she visited Newcastle, “as if she was a film star.” With the passage of half-a-century this beautifully acted and presented film puts events into historical perspective for me. It came as a surprise when I read a recent opinion “this was an utterly terrible, non substance film. It is a seedy, perverted, old man's day dream.” What a repressed son of the Manse wrote this? I stick by my original view that this is an excellent movie.

Mandy Rice-Davies seems to have had wit as well as good looks. Later she described her life "as a slow decline into respectability." Good line!

reply

Don’t think you can rely on this film for historical perspective at all, it being a distorted fictional account.

As for the real life Keeler and Rice-Davies, how many of their alleged good lines were scripted?

reply

Why not ask Mandy? I believe she is still alive.....

reply

What, and get another scripted reply? I think one does have to distinguish between the artificial image of these two women fabricated by the media, including this sometimes enjoyable but ultimately mendacious film, and the harsh reality. I met Keeler after her release from prison and can tell you that, apart from a body already decaying fast through drink and drugs, she had very little else indeed to offer.

reply

The film doesn't present a glamorised or even straightforward portrayal of either women, really, which is what I think you're suggesting. As physically attractive, fun-loving women, yes they were seen as that here, which is what they were 50 years ago, but also as two damaged, complex individuals, quite conniving and in the case of C.K, very immature in a way.

reply