MovieChat Forums > Roger & Me (1989) Discussion > GM slashing 30,000 jobs, closing plants

GM slashing 30,000 jobs, closing plants


GM slashing 30,000 jobs, closing plants
Five U.S. assembly plants to be shut down in cost-cutting move

AP News
Updated: 10:41 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2005

DETROIT - General Motors Corp. will eliminate 30,000 manufacturing jobs and close nine North American assembly, stamping and powertrain plants by 2008 as part of an effort to get production in line with demand and return the company to profitability and long-term growth.

The announcement Monday by Rick Wagoner, chairman and CEO of the world’s largest automaker, represents 5,000 more job cuts than the 25,000 that the automaker had previously indicated it planned to cut.

GM said the assembly plants that will close are in Oklahoma City, Lansing, Mich., Spring Hill, Tenn., Doraville, Ga., and Ontario, Canada. A shift also will be removed at a plant in Moraine, Ohio.

An engine facility in Flint, Mich., will close, along with a separate powertrain facility in Ontario and metal centers in Lansing and Pittsburgh.

Wagoner said GM also will close three service and parts operations facilities. They are in Ypsilanti, Mich., and Portland, Ore. One other site will to be announced later.

“The decisions we are announcing today were very difficult to reach because of their impact on our employees and the communities where we live and work,” Wagoner told employees. “But these actions are necessary for GM to get its costs in line with our major global competitors. In short, they are an essential part of our plan to return our North American operations to profitability as soon as possible.”

GM said the plan is to achieve $7 billion in cost reductions on a running rate basis by the end of 2006 — $1 billion above its previously indicated target.

The company said it would take a “significant” restructuring charge in conjunction with the changes and any related early retirement program. Details of those charges would be released later, GM said.

Any early retirement program would require an agreement with its unions, which GM said it hopes to reach soon.

Wagoner said last month the automaker would announce plant closures by the end of this year to get its capacity in line with U.S. demand. GM plants currently run at 85 percent of their capacity, lower than North American plants run by its Asian rivals. The plant closings aren’t expected to be final until GM’s current contract with the United Auto Workers expires in 2007.

GM has been crippled by high labor, pension, health care and materials costs as well as by sagging demand for sport utility vehicles, its longtime cash cows, and by bloated plant capacity. Its market share has been eroded by competition from Asian automakers led by Toyota Motor Corp. GM lost nearly $4 billion in the first nine months of this year.

The automaker could be facing a strike at Delphi Corp., its biggest parts supplier, which filed for bankruptcy protection last month. GM spun off Delphi in 1999 and could be liable for billions in pension costs for Delphi retirees.

GM also is under investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for accounting errors.

Last week, after the automaker’s shares fell to their lowest level in 18 years, Wagoner sent an e-mail to employees saying the company has a turnaround strategy in place and has no plans to file for bankruptcy.

GM is not the only U.S. automaker faced with the need to cut costs.

Last week, Ford Motor Co. told employees it plans to eliminate about 4,000 white-collar jobs in North America early next year as part of a restructuring plan. Ford said the cuts will be made in part through attrition and elimination of some agency and contract positions.

The plans were outlined Friday in an e-mail to employees from Mark Fields, president for the Americas.

The cuts will be in addition to 2,750 North American salaried jobs that Ford earlier said it wanted to cut by the end of 2005. Ford started the year with about 35,000 salaried workers in North America.

Dearborn-based Ford reported a third-quarter loss of $284 million, including a loss of $1.2 billion before taxes in North America.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10138507/

reply

Hey this is a good time for Michael Moore to make a movie about getting all those displaced workers new training for new jobs. YES! What an idea! Michael Moore can take all his profits from all his past movies and sink em into creating new jobs for all these displaced people! I know this would be real hard on Michael Moore. He may have to cut back on his own personal budgets.... namely food. But I think Moore can pull through and make these little personal sacarfices and help these 30,000 people gain new skills and jobs!

"They call him the giggler, he laughs when he runs."

reply

The UAW continues to destroy the rust belt.

reply

The UAW continues to destroy the rust belt.


How exactly did they do that Let me guess you heard it from rush or sean hannity.
The reality is they close them so they can go to china and make huge profits thats what cooperations do they have to please the stock holders they could care less about workers.

reply

Well, if UAW workers would actually try and work with GM to increase profits, then maybe they could keep the plants here. Instead they just work to their quotas (and average of 5-6 hours a day) and get paid almost in the 6 figures for it. They get no sympathy from me. Not when, we have soldiers who are on food stamps at the same time they are serving our country because they can't feed a family on $15,000 a year. They work harder and longer for less pay than anyone else in this country.

As for UAW, the unions continue to cripple our economy when the need for them probably went away 20 years ago. The government provides the protection the unions once did, so all that is left is the greed and laziness the unions provide. They almost drove GM into bankruptcy in the 90's and are trying to do it again. Maybe if we can follow the Japanese model, we can have profitably automotive manufacturers once again.

As a side note, most of the workers fired before this movie were hired back and it was one of the reasons that GM almost collapsed in the early 90's.

Oh and in case you are wondering where I get my information, it's not from rush, or hannity. It's from people who work for and have worked for GM for years.

reply

You are so misguided. I really feel sorry for you. Acually, I feel even more sorry for myself for having read your explanation. You should consider taking a course on the history of the American labor movement before drawing conclusions.

reply

"Cut back on his food budget"?

Wasn't he fat BEFORE he got famous?

And didn't Morgan Spurlock and his film "Supersize Me" show that it's often cheap and widely available food (such as McDonald's) that can make someone obese?

I'm no fan of outsourcing myself, but I would agree with the film's thesis that the workers deserved a sound explanation from Roger.

reply

the big reason is BECAUSE GM CARS SUCK

reply

[deleted]

My neighbor worked for GM for 25 years. He just took a buy out. He wasn't ready to leave, but he knew his time was up.

Shoot pass kick there ass

reply