My opinion of Charles.


Maybe I'm wrong, but aren't the actions of Charles Highway morally repugnant? The way he fools women into having sex with him I found very offensive. Just my opinion.

reply

I recommend that you read the book by Martin Amis - it is way better than the film, and the film didn't do justice to Charles Highway's character as Amis wrote him up. Charles character was much stronger in the book, in the film he was too weak and sappy.

It's far easier to understand Charles' actions and why he acts the way does in the book than in the film, basically because his isolation comes off more like a precociously intelligent writer who just didn't fit in, and was a social outcast, rather than the geeky womaniser they made him in the film.

Even though it was still quite apparent that Charles was being completely dishonest and false in his relationship with Rachel, in the book it was easier to relate to Charles and associate with his descriptions of the school environment (of which he was a complete misfit and felt largely isolated) and dealing with his family.

In addition, DeForest was much more clearly controlling and conceited in the book than in the film so Charles' rivalry with, and dislike of, DeForest was much more understandable and you could sympathise with him and actually root for him when he stole Rachel from DeForest

reply

Thank you for the explanation Dave. I will definitely check out the book.

reply

good point.



A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.

reply