You have three days left. Make them count. Say goodbye to SamGerrard, wherever he is.
shareThe deal only stands if you agree to leave if Denmark lose.
You have 10 minutes to reply or the deal is off. Now put your money where your mouth is!
Knew you were chicken shit.
Deal is off. You had your chance and blew it because you lack the courage to see it through.
Don’t even think about backing out man. Cuz then I’ll really be pissed. And this? This will all seem like a happy memory compared to what I do to you.
shareYou have proven yourself to be untrustworthy. I don't make deals with the likes of you.
shareSparky is our witness.
shareYou had your chance. Just like you had your chance to stop your bogus trial.
What chance? We agreed. All the arrangements were in place. I logged off. Checked back an hour later to see that you’d pulled a maneuver to weasel yourself out. Now that I’ve confirmed, you’re backing down on a ridiculous technicality.
shareYOU
HAD
YOUR
CHANCE
Lol. Coward.
shareI am a witness to this.
WA is now under a binding obligation to haunt some other board if England loses.
If he reneges on this he is a disgrace but not surprising since he failed to show up @ Harrdos & Jamaica, and lies about answering if he would have felt like a winner in KK3.
WA is on notice, if he tries to weasel out, then it's open season.. on Samgerard.. and WA.
Odd that you should turn up after nearly three weeks. Although not really odd is it?
Stop pretending you and NRC123 are not the same person.
[–] wearsalan (3021) a day ago
Deal
If by vice versa you mean you leave the boards and never come back
I just don't trust you. You didn't answer my question but went and made a new post...this one. I replied within minutes and yet you come back hours later saying you were offline. I think you were contemplating how you could wriggle out of it if Denmark lose. You see you have form here for circumventing the truth. Me, I have form for following through with my word. I left you guys in peace as promised when the old IMDb boards were closing.
I remember romefan123 trying something similar back in the day. He lost and refused to leave. You would do the same.
This bet would be the board’s version of a fight to the death and you’re chickening out. Even Daniel rose to the challenge. You’ve already no-showed at both Harrods and Montego Bay. Let’s settle this rivalry once and for all.
shareHarrods? How was that a no show? Did I say to you I would be there? No, in fact I told you I wouldn't. Or are you on about when you (in your cruisin109 guise) claimed to have flown to London and back on the same day. If so, then you are a liar. How do I know? Because I was there dickhead.
Montego Bay?
Think you got that one wrong. It was Negril. Furthermore, another lie in your cruisin109 guise. You were not there and the deal wasn't when you specified. Again you go on about not giving you a reasonable time to respond, yet your time frame was days for me to fly (in a covid situation) to Jamaica when I'd already said May 12th 2021. Where were you by the way?
Just a fantasist expecting me to leave the boards when you know fine well you would have either refused or wriggled out of it. That's the reason behind your delay and replying.
You are untrustworthy. End of story.
What delay? You gave me ten minutes to reply while I was offline. When I confirmed an hour later, you backed out over the flimsiest of excuses. In another era, the Queen would have had you beheaded for such cowardly nonsense.
That aside, you still have two days left to redeem yourself by agreeing to the bet. You’re also going to look like a total moron if England wins after you backed out.
I replied to you when you were still on line (twice). You even made this thread after I'd replied (twice). So your bullshit holds no credibility here.
I won't look a moron if England wins though will I? I mean your cruisin109 account will seeing as he (you) fully expect(s) me to leave if England lose despite what I've said, so he (you) must be fully expected to leave if Denmark loses. Otherwise, well he(you) would be a hypocrite wouldn't he (you)
See how that works.
Anyway, as I said, I just don't trust you. You kai boys have form after all.
Your stupidity is exhausting. Just admit that your a traitor to your country. You’re too afraid to place a simple wager on them.
shareI believe you meant you're too afraid to place a simple wager on them, not 'your'. Anyway, enough of this chicanery, I just don't trust you to uphold your end of the bargain.
Now when you talk about stupidity why can't you understand where I'm coming from? Are you too stupid?
Honesty. Compassion. Fair play.
shareShame you have none of those
shareNRC 123 tried to uphold the bet .... fair play!
He tried again and again to hold you to the bet you agreed to and yet you refused going back on your word.. dishonesty!
And yet, the Kai still hold out hope for you that you may renounce your corrupt Miyagi Do ways and finally see the light of the Cobra Kai... compassion!
NRC123 tried to uphold the bet....No, he was being elusive so I called the bet off. Not fair play.
He tried again.....only after he'd formulated his way out of it. Dishonesty on his part.
The Kai hold out hope....Why? Why would I want to be part of a group that attacks anyone with an opposing view. Literally hounding people off the boards with threats. Compassion? I'm surprised you can even spell it let alone understand what it means.
I simply didn't trust him, and as it happened I was right not to. He was up to something that he finally revealed even before the match had started
You still avoid the question though. I'll pose it again.
YOU FULLY EXPECTED ME TO LEAVE THE BOARDS DESPITE CALLING THE BET OFF, SAYING THAT THE BET WAS BINDING AND YOU WERE WITNESS TO IT. SO BEARING THIS IN MIND, DO YOU EXPECT NRC123 TO LEAVE THE BOARDS?
It's not a hard question.
I simply didn't trust him, and as it happened I was right not to. He was up to something that he finally revealed even before the match had started.
First off, you need to stop lying about why you delayed reply to me. We both know you were on line when the question was asked (twice) for you to confirm the terms. The notification for those replies must have been in your in box.
After this I thought something was not quite right. That you were up to something. It turns out I was right.
There was no risk on your part. You were already contemplating retiring from the boards, you just wanted one last chance to do something you had never managed to do. Beat me. If you lost (or should I say England won) then so what, you were going to leave anyway.
So when you consider I had nothing to win and you had nothing to lose, why would it make sense to take that bet with YOU?
Credit to you for trying though. Terry Silver would be proud of that level of sneakiness.
I can’t tell if you’re lying or just extremely stupid. Can anyone help me out?
shareHe's stupid. If he didn't trust you and had faith in England winning why not take you up on the bet so he could win and prove that you were lying?
And you still haven't addressed the issue.
As for proving He (you) were lying, read the post where I address this. He was planning to leave anyway, so no risk to him. Under the circumstances he would have just done what he was always planning to do.
I was right not to trust him.
Are you now going to expect your NRC123 account to leave these boards?
After all you fully expected me to leave saying I had a binding obligation haunt some other board if England lost.
BTW, THIS IS NOT ME EXPECTING NRC123 TO LEAVE. I'M JUST WAITING TO SEE IF YOU'RE A HYPOCRITE OR NOT.
I'm not NRC123.. you know that as well but you are running a (bad) joke into the ground.
Keep it up although for the benefit of the dojo I wish you had it in you to come up with more interesting material.
You cowardly tried to renege on the bet again and again as you had no faith in your own country. Your country prevailed despite your lack of support and now you expect for us to honor a bet with a coward who tried to renege every step of the way because he had no faith in his country?
You betrayed your own country on a board with international reach... that's treasonous and the Queen should HAVE YOUR HEAD FOR YOUR INSOLENCE!
No, I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO HONOUR THE DEAL. I CALLED THE DEAL OFF BECAUSE I JUST DIDN'T TRUST HIM, ERGO, AS FAR AS I WAS CONCERNED THERE WAS NO DEAL.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WHAT YOU EXPECT HERE.
DESPITE ME CALLING THE BET OFF, YOU SAID I COULDN'T BACK OUT, THE DEAL WAS BINDING AND YOU WERE WITNESS TO IT AND FULLY EXPECTED ME TO LEAVE IF DENMARK WON. BY THAT STANDARD, SURELY YOU EXPECTED NRC123 TO LEAVE IF DENMARK LOST?
DENMARK LOST SO WHAT IS YOUR EXCUSE OF NOT LIVING UP TO THE (AHEM) HONOURABLE STANDARDS SET BY YOURSELF?
CLEAR ENOUGH EVEN FOR A DICKHEAD LIKE YOU!
You had one chance to beat the kai and all you had to do was show a little faith in your own country.
When England won I bet you were banging your head against the wall saying "Why am I so stupid?!"
Again you avoid the issue.
As I said, I'd rather NRC123 didn't leave the boards. Furthermore, it had nothing to do with a lack of faith in England, in fact I had a bet on England to win. It was a matter of trust in the person I was having the bet with. That person was up to something and now I know what it was.
Now that we have cleared that up let's get back to your double standards. You expected me to leave despite me cancelling the bet if Denmark won. Ergo, by that standard you should be expecting NRC123 to leave after Denmark lost. But instead you are making excuses.
Like Daniel’s victory at the All Valley, England’s win was achieved through wayward refereeing and should not be recognized by the board. Had you accepted the bet, there would be grounds for an appeal as Sterling clearly earned his penalty through diving. The England team failed to abide by the maxim of honesty, compassion and fair play and if anything, YOU should be sanctioned as punishment.
I'm not NRC123.. you know that as well but you are running a (bad) joke into the ground.
VAR disagrees with you.
No argument lost here. Read his (your) post, he (you) said the deal was binding and I couldn't back out. He (you) fully expected me to leave if Denmark won. So by his (your) standard, surely he expects you (him) to leave.
I've already told you that I'd prefer it if you stayed.
You mean to say you're not online 24/7 to provide immediate responses?
That was such a weasel move. WA has less bravery the Daniel.
Welcome back.
Just when you thought he couldn’t stoop any lower, he pulls this shit. This is worse than the bodybag comment following Rob Garrison’s (Tommy) death.
But he WAS on line to reply to my (twice asked for) request for clarification. He was busy posting THIS thread. He must have known about my posts because they were direct replies to him at that time.
No, he was busy trying to find a way to wriggle out of it. Now that I've called the bet off he's blaming me. The ball was clearly in his court at the time.