Would the movie have been better


if Henry Jones had mailed the grail diary to the Marx Brothers?

reply

No. This movie could not possibly be better. Junior!

reply

I agree, although it would have been an unusual turn of events in an Indiana Jones movie.

reply

The movie couldn't possibly get any worse so yes that would have been an improvement.

reply

*gasps* 🤤

BLASPHEMER! 😲

reply

What? Last Crusade was a bad movie plain and simple. No sense of danger, stale acting, a recycled Raiders plot and Henry/Marcus engaged in far too many Jar Jar antics.

reply

So um Hippo you gonna cite this film's place on the top 250? Remember you did it for TDKR so it would only be fair to bring up this film's place on that list correct?

reply

TDKR completely ass rapes Last Crusade on IMDB

reply

So then Last Crusade ass rapes Batman Begins on imdb correct? Forrest Gump also ass raped TDKR on imdb yet I do not see you mention that lol. You never answered my question. Why didn't you cite this film's place on the top 250? You did it for TDKR so why not for this one?

reply

You are the one who injected TDKR into this discussion, I'm sorry the facts aren't on your side.

reply

I asked you a question you could not answer. It proves my point you cite data as long as it suits what you like. You dislike Last Crusade therefore you will not mention the fact that it is on the top 250. Where as with TDKR anytime someone says it is a bad film you immediately cite it's spot on the top 250. Well I figured since you claimed Last Crusade to be a bad film I would have you know it is considered one of top 250 greatest films of all time on imdb.

reply

I realize that it's like #111 on IMDB (give or take, I'm not looking it up), I still don't care, you will never convince me that it's even better than Phantom Menace.

reply

If you realize it's spot on the top 250 why didn't you cite it's spot on the list? I do not care to convince you of anything. I am asking why you did not point out it's place on the top 250? You cited TDKR place on the top 250 therefore isn't it only fair to do the same for Last Crusade? You don't want to be a hypocrite do you?

reply

[deleted]

Oh trust me I know how this dumbass works. He uses ratings of imdb as long as it suits him. He will shove the imdb rating of a film he loves in your face all day. However when it is a film he does not like the high rating will never be mentioned once. Notice how imdb is never mentioned when discussing Last Crusade.

reply

[deleted]

What is his sock account name? Oh and I know he is one of the biggest morons I have ever encountered seriously. It actually is amusing how ignorant he is.

reply

[deleted]

Care to actually post a link this time because I still have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

reply

Hahahahahaha, I believe it was you who hunted me down with baseless accusations and then when asked to back it up you dodged and deflected. I don't have a sock you fucking idiot. I also kicked your ass, when it was obvious you couldn't keep up with me you just ran away.

reply

[deleted]

Buahahahahahahaha, you hunted me down yesterday on the Solo board and now you're doing the same thing all over again. Dude I don't know you, I don't care about you, but you have some kind of sick obsession with me and it's really disturbing.

BTW I'm being gentle with you know because you admitted yesterday that you're mentally retarded.

reply

I think the movie is a piece of shit, why would I care where it is on IMDB?

reply

And I think TDKR is a piece of shit why would I care what it is rated on IMDB?

reply

I really don't care, but remember you are the one who initiated this whole debate when I posted my opinion on TDKR board so apparently you do care.

reply

Yep because you cited the data when someone pointed out that they disliked TDKR. I just know how idiots like you operate. You will cite data when it suits your point. The second it does not it gets dropped like a ten ton brick. Not one time did I see you cite the data for Last Crusade. Why is that?

reply

TDKR destroys Last Crusade on IMDB and I didn't bring that up.......

reply

Forrest Gump destroys TDKR on imdb what is your point? Doers not matter you never referenced Last Crusade's spot on imdb's top 250 why not?

reply

If I referenced it would support the idea that TDKR is better.

reply

Yep but it would also support that Crusade is considered one of the greatest films of all time. So again why wasn't it referenced by you?

reply

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is ranked #111 on IMDB and is objectively crushed by almost every film by Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight, Inception, The Prestige, Memento, Interstellar, The Dark Knight Rises)

Happy???

reply

Nope say it just flat out like you did with TDKR. See you can't do it without it being underhanded.

reply

What I said is an objectively true statement, deal with it.

reply

Yep and Return of the King is rated higher than TDKR. That is an objective true statement, deal with it.

reply

I said that a long time ago you fucking idiot and I still don’t care.

reply

And I do not care how high TDKR is rated on imdb I still think it is a piece of trash.

reply

Good for you but I will say that if you actually understood it you would recognize it's greatnest. You think Bruce quit because of Rachel which is wrong on every front.

reply

Good for you if you actually understood Return of the King you would realize it is one of the greatest. After all you think LOTR was a science fiction which is wrong on every front.

reply

There's nothing to get about it, that's the thing, LOTR is a very simple and straight forward story, TDKR has deep themes and complex characters which is why it's just too much for your tiny simplistic brain to handle. I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that you don't fully understand it.

reply

There is nothing to get about TDKR. TDKR is a simple Batman film nothing more. Straight forward story with a guy doing a silly batvoice.

LOTR actually dares to ask the bigger more complex questions. It deals with the afterlife and what it takes to get there. Leaving loved ones behind. Which is why it is just too much for your tiny simplistic brain to handle.

I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt you do not fully understand it.

After all I am not the one who thinks LOTR is a science fiction film. Talk about stupid.

reply

Obviously it isn't because you think Bruce quit because of Rachel.

Hahahahahaha, that whole afterlife theme was so in your face you'd have to be mentally disabled to miss it or not get it. It's not deep at all, it was a very straight forward message that any 5 year old could get. You haven't proven anything except that you know how to recycle my own words.

Where did I say LOTR was a science fiction film? I remember saying 2001 A Space Odyssey was a Sci-Fi Masterpiece. Again reading comprehension isn't your strength apparently.

reply

Well another poster once said LOTR was a science fiction film and you did not correct him so you must believe it.

reply

Show me the link and I'll correct him

reply

Now you will simply to save face. You agree with him.

reply

So there is no link??? Gotcha

You see the difference is I was actually able to provide a link and proof, you are just pulling shit out of your asshole.

reply

And where was the proof that you made that Pulp Fiction trilogy?

Pot meet kettle. Do not ask for proof when you will not provide any yourself got it?

reply

Post your address and I'll send you a copy.

reply

Why not prove it on here?

reply

How?

reply

Release it then once it is measured by imdb, MC, RT and the Oscars I will believe you. Until then sorry I think you're lying.

reply

First show me a legit definition which says that all trilogies must be reviewed on all of those sites.

reply

This is not about definition. It is about the grounds for me to believe you.

reply

I don't have to show you that because even if it weren't then it wouldn't disqualify it as a trilogy

reply

Is this the quote you're talking about, I clearly state 2001:

"2001 was hated by critics when it first came out, but a few decades later it is considered a Sci-Fi Masterpiece and is one of the most beloved films of all time."

reply

[deleted]

Yeap, ultimatehippo is an idiot

reply

For not liking a movie?

reply

For not liking a movie?

You cannot honestly think that that's the reason. The reason people think you are an idiot is because you behave like one, it has nothing to do with your likes or dislikes. I don't care that you don't like Crusade, it makes no difference to me. But your insistence that it's the worstest movie of all time ever, and it is extremely important for you that other people know it, that makes you a looney. And when you try to defend your positions, your arguments are shit. If you stuck to actual points (eg. the fact that they played it safe for Crusade, such that you could say it's a rehash of Raiders), then you wouldn't find so much opposition. But you insist that it's aimed at children (while claiming Temple was not!), and was all about slapstick (while again loving Temple, which hardly had a single scene without it!), and you are positively obsessed with a simple mention of "Mickey Mouse" - as if that was supposed to make kids laugh. It is that sort of lunacy which makes you an idiot. Or, to use your very own words for such instances: an Ultimate Retard.

reply

Your complete lack of anything resembling a convincing argument proves that you are an Ultimate Retard.

reply

Absolutely

reply

Count your blessings they set that Hitler/book burning sequence in there. Everyone is present & accounted for...Adolf, Goering, Goebbels.

Otherwise, it's pedestrian fare up & down the running length.

reply

RussellNash, even though we don't agree with each other on Last Crusade I must apologize for these two morons who hunted me down and hijacked your thread. If you want to repost your thread I'll understand.

reply

No apology necessary, TheUltimateHippo. 😃 Last Crusade may be a favorite of mine, but I respect your opinion - and you do have a point about it being a recycled Raiders.

reply

Grail diary arrives in Groucho Marx's mail...opens it in the presence of his brothers Chico, Harpo and Zeppo...

CHICO: Hey...thissa looka like some CODE book. Can you decipher it?
GROUCHO: Are you kidding? A 4 year old boy can decipher this.
HARPO squeezes his honker stick in agreement...

GROUCHO TO ZEPPO: Go out and find me a 4 year old boy. I can't make head or tail of this...

reply

😂👏

reply

I don't think it would have been better, but only because the Marx Brothers are not that famous outside the USA.

reply

Well I'm from Denmark and I understood the reference as a kid.

reply

Yes but other than the reference you had no idea who the hell they are and who is who in their formation. I got the reference too, that doesn't mean much if they had to be part of the plot in a more significant way than a joke.

reply

The one with the cigar is the leader, right? 🤔

reply

Ahaha, yes it's him!

reply