OK, now you're seriously asking for a spanking you little chav brat.
I've been using this fricking web site for _more than a DECADE_, something you certainly can't claim. Don't even begin to try and tell me about this site!
If you had ANY clue you'd realize that this film has ALWAYS been listed as Fat Man and Little Boy on the MAIN imdb site... if you were still using the UK mirror, well then of course titles on _that server_ reflect what local distributors sometimes choose to distribute films as in that given region.
However, you still would have seen that it had ALWAYS been listed under the alternate titles what the film has ALWAYS been known as in the US - you know, where the film was produced and first released. Which is why despite however many times you try and say "but it said this" you're not understanding the fact that you are CONFUSED and the official title for this film has __always__ been Fat Man and Little Boy.
There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it. The only reason you're whiny at this point is because you made such a horribly innacurate statement, and when somebody who actually can read and has a working memory bothered to explain that your "revisionism theory" is no more than your local film distributor having used a different name for marketing reasons is finally using the ACTUAL name for the film, you went boo hoo.
It's not revisionist, it's simply a marketing schmuck in the UK who felt it needed to be called something else there _when it first came out_ why you think of it as "Shadowmakers" and apparently didn't know the real name. However to whine and whine and whine bitching like a little girl because you thought it was some sort of "conspiracy" when it was nothing of the sort just proves how little you read before posting.
Deal with it chav. Kiss my ring.
reply
share