Nolan's films have better scripts and drama; yes.
But the way Gotham looks in the 1989 and 90's movies is just tremendous.
Giant statues, buildings and whatnot.
I know English a lot gooder than you.
I wouldn't say they had better scripts. They have newer scripts in which more things are allowed to happen and be shown.
This was the first time a main-stream comic book hero was allowed to go dark. But, they couldn't go too dark because it might turn off too many people.
And guess what, that has been a complaint not only of the new Superman movies, but of TDK trilogy as well. They are dark to the point of morose.
But, they couldn't go too dark because it might turn off too many people.
And guess what, that has been a complaint not only of the new Superman movies, but of TDK trilogy as well. They are dark to the point of morose.
No way they had better scripts, writing every character differently and having their actions, not words, dictate the plot, are the two most basics screenwriting rules, and Nolan is too self-obsessed to follow either.
shareNolan films have zero atmosphere and his scripts are always full of the most stupid plotholes.
shareNolan's films have better scripts if you count melodrama, pretentious dialogue and overwrought characters as being examples of good writing.
Either put on these glasses or start eatin' that trash can
I think Burtons are far better looking and had far better atmosphere.
share