Why was this superannuated actor given the title role?

According to the book "Losing the Light", he was willing to do all the physical things (borderline stunts) that were asked of him, and he had a face that could easily be made up to look older than he actually was.

Originally some marquis actors were solicited for the role so they could lure other A-list talent for cameos, but the role was too demanding.

I thought Neville did a fine job. I'm just sorry he was only in this one feature film, because I would have loved to have seen a TV series about the Baron's adventures with him in the role.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

He suited the role. On the documentary about this film, Gilliam said they wanted an actor that 'had been forgotten', as opposed to a big name at the time.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

John Neville was pretty much a B actor at this time.

Why would you say a stupid thing like this?



Always feel free to attack someone as a substitute for thinking.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Who gives a damn if he was a B actor or not? From my perspective, most B actors are better than most A actors most of the time, anyway.

If this is a consular ship, where is the ambassador?

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Whatever his reputation before this role, I think he did an excellent job, and when I read the Münchhausen stories today, I can picture him as Neville portrayed him, in this film.

Also, I'd hardly refer to a 64-year-old, which Neville was at the time, as "superannuated".

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

reply share

add reply

formatting help