MovieChat Forums > Neco z Alenky (1990) Discussion > I HATE THIS FILM (SAID THE WHITE RABBIT)

I HATE THIS FILM (SAID THE WHITE RABBIT)


I just finished my A-level film studies exam on this film... thank God! I never have to think about it again. Possibly the most annoying, unentertaining and painfully drawn out film I've ever seen. After having heard those lips say "said the white rabbit" about ninety times, I wanted to start pushing staples into my eyeballs. Yes, this film is just that good.

On the other hand, its a very easy exam to right about: sexual themes? Doorknobs being pulled off, keys in holes, the frogs extendable tongue? Phallic symbols at their most obvious.

Anyways... I just thought I'd post this to vent my years worth of frustration at being forced to watch this film. No judgment if you like it... but I don't!!!

reply

I really thought this film could have breen great, but the lips totally ruined it. By the end of the movie, I was ready to eat my own fist I was so annoyed.

reply

Svankmajer seems to feature extreme close-ups of lips in so many of his films - I find it okay once or twice but a lot of his visual themes get tiresome in a feature length movie.

reply

you said it's very easy to "right about"?

Your argument is invalid.

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2339870/

reply

this movie simply scared the hell out of me. I watched it when I was 10 and it still makes up a few nightmares now and then.

IAmYou

reply

[deleted]

You do know that Svankmajer is Czech, and has nothing to do with Germany, right?

reply

The Czech Republic neighbors Germany. (this is directed to the person that says that it has nothing to do with Germany)

On the other hand, the lips may be less annoying if you watch the film it's original Czech and not in English- because I find Camilla Power's voice the annoying part of the ordeal.

reply

I think this movie is great.

reply

Your an idiot( Said Alice to herself) This movie was strange, but the lips set it apart from any other film.

~*~The journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step~*~

reply

I found it to be a facsinating study of the grotesque. But I will admit, the moving lips were constantly pulling me out of the film, and prevented me from really reveling in it.

"Consistency is the last resort of the unimaginative."
-Oscar Wilde

reply

The point of the lips, and many other things in the movie, is to distance the viewer and annoy them. Surrealist cinema was about provoking a reaction in an audience, not necessarily a positive, and so despite what I said in my first post about not liking the film, although this is true, thats also the point. It was an interesting film to study, but that didn't mean it was enjoyable in ANY way.

reply

I found it fresh and enjoyable, although I will admit I'm a novice to surrealist film. Even if you hated this, perhaps recommend something else?
Still, I feel it captures the essence of fairy tale imagery - if you grew up on Disney, you really don't understand the darkness that fairy tales substantiante psychologically - Lewis Carroll would be pleased, I think. The story was meant to deal with the often grotesque initiation into adulthood, and does so quite vividly.

reply


'The point of the lips, and many other things in the movie, is to distance the viewer and annoy them. Surrealist cinema was about provoking a reaction in an audience, not necessarily a positive, and so despite what I said in my first post about not liking the film, although this is true, thats also the point. It was an interesting film to study, but that didn't mean it was enjoyable in ANY way.'

all cinema is to provoke a reaction.

reply

I think it's hilarious when people say "your an idiot".

Perhaps you -- the person calling someone an idiot -- meant to say "you're"?

reply

I suppose we should pronounce you're as "yewurh" or only say "you are" instead - oh wait! That would be stupid. The meaning of the contraction is obvious in spoken language through the context of the surrounding sentence - a curious happening that is also true around 99% of the time in written text.

Also, writing "your" instead of "you're" is pretty easy to do - when most people are typing, their brain is "speaking" the words that they are typing, a sort of "voice" in their head. This voice says "you're", which in most locations is phonetically equivalent to "your", and the fingers may simply type the wrong word - especially when the typist is a little sleep-deprived, or otherwise impaired.

I personally find it hilarious when people nitpick over trifling *beep* such as a simple and common misspelling, or someone correcting someone else's spelling or grammar.

reply

we must have dissimilar senses of humor.

reply

I understood the "said the..." parts to be as if it was coming directly off the pages of a book, or as if she was telling us about it AFTER it had happened. It was very surrealistic, and I don't think it would have seemed right to have the story without feeling like it was coming directly from her. But that's just me...

Nonetheless, even if you are distracted by the "Said the..." parts, there isn't a bunch of dialogue, so there isn't a whole lot to worry about.

"On the list of things that are not ok, that is really not ok!"

reply

i love this film and i also studied it for film studies. i did find it uneasy to watch with the repetitiveness of it, but not to the extent of not liking it. if that makes sense. i really enjoyed learning about it and watching it.

reply

As much as i have to like Surrealist films to 'get' them, this film just grates on me. Doing it for A levels is the most painful thing ever. We take a film course yet we never actually get to make a film. I meant big wtf on that. To summarise all surrealist films/artists/whatever all seem to have some kind of pretentious agenda against me. I dont like them. They raped me - physically and metaphysically.

reply


'As much as i have to like Surrealist films to 'get' them, this film just grates on me. Doing it for A levels is the most painful thing ever. We take a film course yet we never actually get to make a film. I meant big wtf on that. To summarise all surrealist films/artists/whatever all seem to have some kind of pretentious agenda against me. I dont like them. They raped me - physically and metaphysically.'

dont mean to pick things out of everyones comments but! its film studies not film making of cinematography. sorry

reply

i found the lips ok. the bit that spolit it for me was the horrible scenes with the cards - the whole climax of alice in wonderland is the scene with the queen. that took up about 5 minutes of the whole film, and they were tacky cards! i mean, i know lewis carroll said they were cards, but making them bits of paper just meant that was the least scary part of the film. as for phallic symbols...the live socks burrowing into the floor was pretty unsubtle!

reply

The lips, the repetition, the incredible slow pace (especially the first hour) ruined this. For interesting Czech stop motion, see Jiri Barta's work : "Pied Piper"

reply

Obsessive repetitiveness is a Svankmajer hallmark. His films, especially the short ones, are often very percussive via both sound and visual editing. I personally loved the detachment evoked by the lips close-ups, although I do see your point. I think how someone reacts to this one conceit is a good litmus test corresponding to tolerence of the rest of his work.

Like you said, Alice is highly sexual but I disagree with your focus on phallic imagery. In my opinion, he's more sensualist than Freudian, but I know little about psychoanalysis and less about film theory.

If you thought Alice was drawn-out I'd advise you to stay far away from Faust.

(Oh, and P.S. - I wish I could have attended your high school.)

reply

We have just finished watching this film today in my A2 Film Studies class and I can agree with 100% of everything the original poster said. Unfortunately my exam is still to come so i'm not done with this yet.

reply

Speaking of sexual themes, I could definitely see the close ups on Alice's lips being thought of in a sexual way. Although I personally didn't, lips are a highly sexualized part of the body.

reply

My two cents... I loved it.
As for the lips, I had no problem with it. Indeed, I found the repetitiveness a little amusing.
Hope I get to study this next year. I still don't really 'get' the sexual symbolism though.

reply

I still don't really 'get' the sexual symbolism though.

Me neither. People have been trying to pin sexual themes on the story ever since the original Lewis Carroll book. And from the sound of this thread, that's what they're teaching in film school.

Now someone like Kubrick who had an open fixation with phallic symbols can definitely be interpreted with a ton of sexual symbolism. But Jan Svankmajer? Lewis Carroll? I really don't think so. Obviously, anything can be sexual if you choose to look at it that way, and the modern perspective is generally drenched in sexuality. But I wish people would give it a rest once in a while. As Freud himself allegedly said, "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."

So if anyone out there can convince me why this film is so sexual (note: I said convince me, not just argue), please speak up.

With that said, I think it's a crime to try to find all sorts of supercilious symbolism in a film like this, which begins by saying, "this is a film for children; you must close your eyes or you won't see anything." Just like Cocteau's Beauty and the Beast (another surrealistic fairytale which begins with a prologue telling us NOT to overanalyze it), I think people would enjoy this film much more if they just have fun with it. That was the original context of Lewis Carroll's work, and I believe that's the spirit of this visual presentation. It sounds like most of the people who hate this film hate it because they were forced to learn it in film class. If so, hell yeah, I'd hate it too. But in my case, I just watched it on a lazy Sunday afternoon, and I thought it was a lot of fun.

reply

Yeah good point, Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and on that note sometimes a doorknob is just a doorknob...
But this is NOT a movie for children, the rabbit is creepy as hell, and is constantly loosing his stuffing (children may interpret this as a slow death by loosing your innards, or symbolically we may perceive him loosing himself, and Alice following his lead...?)

The only point that I want to make is the lips...

What is the problem with the lips...?

Yes they don't sync. There are whole countries out there whose primary language isn't English. Some of these countries make movies. When they make movies the actors normally stick with their fist language. When these movies are exported to an international market they are overdubbed or subtitled.
The nature of this particular piece of cinema is such that there are many closely cropped mouth shots spoken in Czech then dubbed into English. I can see how this could be annoying, but what do you suggest...?
Next time the 10 year old girl should go into training in a remarkable case of method acting to learn to speak proper English like her Victorian era namesake...
Anything less and I'm going to write a really angry post!
Is it too much to overlook it and enjoy the stop motion animation on display, for some, clearly yes, for me, I dig it like a fat man's grave...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I'm honestly surprised that so many people don't like this film. I've watched it so many times and the animation and imagery is so beautiful I don't really understand why so many people find this film hard to watch. I mean, to each their own, but if you ask me this film is a *beep* masterpiece.

I've noticed that some people tend to like the Brothers Quay better. They're a little more modern but have taken some very direct ques from Svankmajer. Perhaps if you're interested in surreal animation that would be a good place to start.

Apocalypse Meow

reply

i had a headache for 2 hours after watching this :@

reply

I had to watch this for a film class. It may be the freakiest movie I have ever seen! That said, it may also be one of the coolest films that I have ever seen, as well. The imagery was so awesome. My friends and I were alternately speechless and confused while laughing our asses off at the sheer randomness and weirdness of it all.

However, the whole "said the white rabbit" thing was so *beep* annoying! Thank god there wasnt that much dialogue. What a trip!

I want whatever she got (said the white rabbit)

reply

The film is certainly intellectual. It is not a Hollywood blockbuster, it is not meant to be "entertaining" or to allow the viewer to sit and be pacified. As all good art should, it provokes thought. Too bad that many people would rather be placated than challenged.
The purpose of the lips is to excentuate the fact that this is, indeed, a story. There is a narrator, and all of the information comes filtered through this narrator, so that we, the audience, cannot trust what we are seeing. There is a play between the literary text and the filmic text. In fact, the very first words spoken are "this is a film." An excellently done, as well as visually appealing piece, Jan Svankmajer extracts the surrealism and underlying horror present in children's literature, which also leads to the understanding of the horrors of adult life as well.

reply

Agreed

My TOP 200 Movies -http://www.imdb.com/list/iFa7p7uwsr8/

reply