MovieChat Forums > I Saw What You Did (1988) Discussion > What's the difference between this and t...

What's the difference between this and the original?


Topic ;)

reply

[deleted]

Actually, the two movies have a great deal in common. The killer does away with his wife so he can be free to have a life with Joan Crawford's character, with whom he's having an affair of sorts (she refuses to "put out" while he's still married, thus providing Joan with an opportunity to do some real acting).

There's also a trio of girls in the original, one being the kid sister.

Castle's films almost always had a nasty edge to them, and most of the characters had you wishing they step in a bear trap or something - but that doesn't make it camp. Time (if anything) has made it seem campy. The dialog was very much of its day - if you "hear" characters in a film from or about the 1920s saying things like "23 Skidoo!" you don't think it's campy, that's just how people spoke, that was their idiom. And the original I KNOW WHAT YOU DID was still riding the tail end of the '50s, even in '65. The wholesome middle class of hte era held onto the 1950s for a looooooong time.

So try not to ride the original too hard - it was good enough to remake, after all...

reply

the killer did not knife his wife in the shower the guy was taking a shower his wife came into the bathroom to find the bathroom trashed she opens the shower curtin she starts running her mouth off then her knifes her in the shower no its not a rip off of physco

reply

The biggest difference is the ending: at the end of the remake the killer's brother rings up the more cautious of the two girls and says "Kay, I know who you are. You killed my brother." Not exactly a happy-ever-after ending!

reply

The main murder does recall Psycho, only it's the murderer who's nude and the victim who's fully-clothed.



Yippee: "For king!"
Yappee: "For country!"
Yahooie: "And, most of all, for 10ยข an hour!"

reply

Only one difference. This one STINKS.

reply

How'd it stink? I liked both this one and the origional. One thing I like about this one, it that it moved at faster pace, I think. But the original seemed to have a more satisfying/scary ending.

reply

I haphazardly recorded half of this movie, the latter half, with no idea of the Joan Crawford original, or I think I'd seen the title advertised in tv schedules, but had no idea what it might have been like.

I didn't have cable and the original came on, I asked my brother to record it so I could see how they compared. We watched the original and I think I was befuddled by the differences, mainly being Crawford.

I missed the crime committed in the remake, but was wholly intrigued by the two Carradine brothers matching wits with Smith and Lauren.

Yea, Carradine's call at the end was different, but truthfully, the whole movie was different to me.

The Carradines were nothing like Ireland and Crawford. They were much more inter-active. Crawford was just seeking deeper and deeper into Mommiedearest.

The first one was still too Psycho imitating, as well as the peculiar teen-age attempt, which makes it for one odd watch.

'88 looks like '88.

reply

[deleted]