Chick Gandil's story


In 1956, Chick Gandil wrote (with Melvin Duslag) a lengthy account of the scandal for Sports Illustrated in which he confessed everything. But he also claimed that the Sox hadn't actually thrown the Series, but lost legitimately because of the pressure they felt knowing they were under scrutiny. He also implicates Buck Weaver far more deeply in the conspiracy, saying Weaver -- far from being disinterested -- came up with a scheme to rip off both sets of gamblers. Not sure how much of Gandil's story to believe, but his is the only such account by one of the eight and is definitely worth reading. Link below.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1131689/1/i ndex.htm

reply

Thanks EJF, great read. To me it looks like we'll never know the real story, each guy has his own. But this is the first I've heard about Gandil's interview.

Sounds like a fustercluck from the get-go. OK we'll tank a few games, but then we'll come back and win the world series. We'll get money from the gamblers and be heroes for winning the world series. But it fell apart from the start. Nobody knew who to trust.

reply

The link to Gandil's piece seems to have changed. Here's an updated one:

http://www.si.com/vault/2005/11/04/8374526/the-black-sox-my-side-of-the-story

reply

Here is another working link that I found to the story

http://baseballhistorian.blogspot.com/2012/03/chick-gandils-side-of-story.html

reply

wow!



🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴

reply

Gandil said this:

β€œThere was Charles Comiskey, the White Sox owner. He was a sarcastic, belittling man who was the tightest owner in baseball. If a player objected to his miserly terms, Comiskey told him: β€˜You can take it or leave it.’ Under baseball's slave laws, what could a fellow do but take it? I recall only one act of generosity on Comiskey's part. After we won the World Series in 1917, he splurged with a case of champagne.”

It's common belief that Comiskey was cheap, and perhaps he was, but it's been noted by others that the White Sox had the *highest* payroll in baseball in 1919.

I think all baseball players during that time thought their owners were cheap.

reply