MovieChat Forums > Die Hard (1988) Discussion > Finally solved?... how DID McClane ident...

Finally solved?... how DID McClane identify Bill Clay as Gruber


There is often a lot of discussion about how McClane identified Gruber when he encounters him on the top floor.

Many people -- myself included -- think it happens when McClane offers Gruber a cigarette, but no satisfactory explanation to my mind has ever been put out there.

My opinion is that a few seconds of film ended up on the cutting room floor that might have definitively solved this mystery.

I just watched this again last night for probably about the 10th time. I noticed a few things that had never jumped out at me before.

i. Early in the movie, McClane takes out two separate "terrorists" and goes through their effects, pocketing their cigarettes.

A few minutes later his is talking to Al for the first time on the radio and he tells him:

"These guys are mostly European judging from their clothing labels and---"

At this point, Willis very deliberately pauses and looks over his shoulder as if he's had some sort of realization.

"-- cigarettes."

It's not clear what it is about the cigarettes that made him pause. I wonder now though if it ties into his later attempt to identify Hans.

ii. When Gruber inhales on the cigarette he holds it between the tips of his thumb and index finger which is common among Europeans.

The camera cuts back to McClane who is holding his cigarette low between his index finger and his middle finger, the way that North Americans normally hold their cigarettes.

So that too may have tipped off McClane.

iii. Finally, on another board, someone else had a very clever explanation too. Earlier in the movie McClane above the elevator looking down through the grill. Below him is the terrorist that he killed -- "Now I have a machine gun..." -- and Gruber is reading the words on the sweater.

McClane can't see Gruber's face, but he CAN see his hands. When Gruber reaches forward to the body, his watch is exposed.

Later he offers the cigarette to Hans and when Hans reaches forward, his sleeve pulls back, revealing the watch that McClane saw earlier.

Again, confirmation that Bill Clay is Gruber...



reply

Guy investigating the roof after McClane saw the explosives. Even if he gave Hans 1% of being civilian, an unloaded gun is the safer bet. We're talking about an NYPD seasoned cop, not some Rambo jabroni.

...my essential 50 http://www.imdb.com/list/ls056413299/

reply

I agree. I would expect that a cop wouldn't give a civilian a gun at all in this situation. Too much risk of panic and an innocent getting shot.

The gun was a test based on his suspicions. The question has always been: What caused him to suspect Bill Clay in the first place?

reply

[deleted]

^^^^THIS!

reply

Some good observations, most of which have been touched on before, particularly the cigarettes, which I agree with.

Also, I'm not sure if this is a fact, but there was a rumour floating around years ago that the guy that John was talking to on the plane WAS Bill Clay, at least in one of the scripts.

reply

Topic creator is over thinking it just as a lot of others do. John didn't know if this guy was a civilian or a terrorist, but gave him an empty gun to see if this guy could be trusted or not. Anybody can tell that once Hans reveals himself, John realized that it was Hans. It's that simple.

reply

Exactly.... MacClane figured it out when Gruber pointed the (empty) gun at him. Not sure why you need to analyze it deeper than that.

The much more mysterious question is how Gruber came up with the Clay name...

reply

The much more mysterious question is how Gruber came up with the Clay name...


He saw the name on the directory hanging on the wall along with everyone else that worked on that floor. The camera pans too it.

reply

McClane saw the sign, and i realize its on the sign, but they never show Gruber see it, but you might be right... its that simple, but i didn't think it was in his line of site.

reply

McClane saw the sign, and i realize its on the sign, but they never show Gruber see it


............................................________........................
....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,..................
.............................,.-”...................................“-.,............
.........................,/...............................................”:,........
.....................,?......................................................\,.....
.................../...........................................................,}....
................./......................................................,:`^`..}....
.............../...................................................,:”........./.....
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../.....
............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../........
.........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/...........
..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}...........
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../............
...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../.............
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”...............
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\...................
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__...........
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,....
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\........................
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\.......................
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__..
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``.......
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\...............
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\..............

Anyone here mentions Hotel California dies before the first line clears his lips.

reply

You're missing my point.

My post -- maybe I worded it poorly -- was how/why did McClane suspect that Clay was a terrorist BEFORE he even offered up the gun?

Clay just confirmed his identity to McClane and McClane would have had no reason to disbelieve his story. Once Clay's story 'checked out', McClane still would have no reason to give him a gun.

In fact, a cop wouldn't do that at all, content to let a civilian tag along with him unarmed. Too much chance of a panicky civilian shooting himself or an innocent accidentally.

Despite Clay seemingly solid ID and story though McClane went through with the test with no obvious reason for it.

My post was more about what tipped him off that Clay was bogus. The confirmation part is just an afterthought...

Hopefully, that clarifies the original post...

reply

You're missing my point.

My post -- maybe I worded it poorly -- was how/why did McClane suspect that Clay was a terrorist BEFORE he even offered up the gun?

Clay just confirmed his identity to McClane and McClane would have had no reason to disbelieve his story. Once Clay's story 'checked out', McClane still would have no reason to give him a gun.

In fact, a cop wouldn't do at all, content to let a civilian tag along with him unarmed. Too much chance of a panicky civilian shooting himself or an innocent accidentally.

Despite Clay seemingly solid ID and story though McClane went through with the test with no obvious reason for it.

My post was more about what tipped him off that Clay was bogus. The confirmation part is just an afterthought...

Hopefully, that clarifies the original post...

reply

He was a good cop who was suspicious of anybody that he didn't know for certain who they were. To be safe, he handed him the empty gun because he didn't know Clay from Hans or any of the terrorists. If trust was earned, he would have given him the clip. Think of it this way. If you were in the situation, would you have given a loaded gun to someone who may or may not have been a terrorist? If the answer is no, then good for you for using some effing common sense. If the answer is yes, then just think about that for a few seconds....

reply

"These guys are mostly European judging from their clothing labels and---"

At this point, Willis very deliberately pauses and looks over his shoulder as if he's had some sort of realization.

"-- cigarettes."



I always took this to mean John simply thought he heard something hence the pause, as opposed to a moment of realization. Could be just me.


There were supposedly scenes where John notices that all the guys he kills (and searches) are wearing Tag Heuer watches however these were all cut, likewise he notices Han's watch but this scene was also cut for continuity, therefor creating a continuity error in itself of sorts. There was to be an establishing scene involving the watches early on (when the "terrorists" first leave their truck in the basement carpark) but again cutting room floor.

When John glances at the board and sees that in fact Clay is on the employee board, the audience is probably supposed to think John has been thrown off as to Han's identity (not us though, as we know what Hans looks like).

Personally I prefer everyone else's explanation that he simply doesn't know one way or the other whether Clay is a civilian or terrorist and it's completely reasonable for him to suspect him, hence giving him the unloaded weapon as a safe test.



UNCOMPROMISING UNDERGROUND FILTH

reply

I always assumed it was just John realizing he had cigarettes he could smoke. Since he lights up right after.

But yeah, he mentions enough things to understand why he didn't believe "Bill" was who he said he was. There doesn't need to be one "aha!" moment. It's the combination of all the things suggested here in some way or another:

1. Unlikely that someone would be able to wander upstairs, let alone have it not come up on the radio at some point.
2. Too nice a suit, plus McClane had seen the suit before (albeit indirectly two times).
3. The watch.
4. The voice while changed enough to not be a smoking gun on its own (heavy accent on CB versus decent American accent in person) is enough to make him wonder.
5. Gruber pauses when they first meet before he launches into "Aw Gawddddd!" etc. Longer than a real hostage probably would.

I'm sure there's more.

Bottom line, he's a savvy cop who didn't hand a loaded gun to someone he just met. If he had be certain it was Gruber he'd have pointed the gun at his head (loaded).



Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply

I always assumed John knew because the sign on the board said "CLAY WM" instead of "CLAY B"

reply

[deleted]

Are you making a joke, or are serious?

reply

His accent? I'll never know why people are fooled by this? It's clearly Hans speak all the way...

reply

May he rest in peace.

The late, great Alan Rickman was a Brit.

As evidenced by his accent in Dogma (could have been over exaggerated)

As Hans Gruber, Rickman does a German (?) accent.

When Hans is confronted with McClane he suddenly speaks American?

I remember reading somewhere that this scene was added (?) or was altered when the director found out that Al could do an American accent.

I could be wrong.

In any event, Merry Christmas!

reply

o wow..good calls with the cigarettes & the watch...

http://www.imdb.com/list/kqPSGxyrCVI/

http://www.imdb.com/list/LeCFe9OQTEA/

reply

When McClane first comes across 'Bill Clay' McClane appears genuinely surprised to see a civilian running around loose. Gruber does not tell McClane that he 'escaped' from the terrorists... so the argument about lack of radio chatter from the terrorists has no basis. McClane would have no reason not to think that someone else in the entire building may have evaded the terrorists like he did.

If you watch the scene on Youtube, it's very clear that it's only AFTER he gives Bill Clay the cigarette -- but BEFORE Bill Clay gives him his name -- that McClane's demeanour changes and he appears suspicious. Hence, the reason he asks Bill Clay his name.

So, I stand fast in my argument that something about the cigarettes makes him suspect Bill Clay's veracity, especially in view of the earlier scene when he was talking to Al about the fact that the cigarettes were European.

However, the watch/suit is a valid argument too so I'll concede that one.

The idea that he would just hand over an empty gun as a general means test is also poor logic by some people here. No cop would do that. What happens if Bill Clay is genuine, the terrorists confront them and poor Bill gets killed trying to defend himself with his empty gun? McClane would be to blame for misleading him.

No, McClane knew BEFORE he handed the gun over that Bill Clay was not who he said he was.

reply

^^^ I think the above explains this best

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=22632331

reply

It reminds me of the ending to The Thing.

reply