MovieChat Forums > Caddyshack II (1988) Discussion > 3.4 ? ? ? are people crazy ! ! !

3.4 ? ? ? are people crazy ! ! !


Just was on TV and because of the low rating wanted to avoid it. But It was quite funny, some of the 80's charm about it.

reply

Yes, people are crazy. I wonder how many people rated it higher than the one it deserves to average out the rating.

reply

They need to let people vote zero. Then this films rating would average out.

reply

[deleted]

Are you serious? This movie is awful. They took jokes from the first movie and tried making them bigger but instead just made them stupid. This movie should never have been made.

reply

[deleted]

I gave it a 1 only because I couldn't give it a 0. This movie is garbage.

reply

To be honest giving the movie a 3/10 is way to generous, this movie was awful and never should have been made. The only descent thing about this movie is Chevy Chase reprising his role as Ty Webb, he only appeared in a few scenes but his scenes were actually kind of funny. And the soundtrack was pretty good. The rest of the movie was a pile of s^%$!!!

I give the original Caddyshack a 7/10

I give Caddyshack II a 1/10 (If Chevy Chase didn't return I would give it a 0/10)

reply

The only funny scenes in this movie are with Randy Quaid. And there aren't even that many of them.

Dan Akroyd was so bad, it was uncomfortable to watch. I was embarrassed FOR him.

reply

To think there was a brief time that my (then 8 year-old) mind thought this was better than the original.

May God have mercy on my soul :-(

reply

I enjoyed it in its own. Jackie mason was a bad pick for this film but i found it entertaining for what it was. I think most people compare this to the original which was lightning in a bottle and they are disappointed because of it.

reply

[deleted]