MovieChat Forums > Bird (1988) Discussion > Whitaker and Eastwood were snubbed

Whitaker and Eastwood were snubbed


How did this film only get an Academy Award Nomination for sound? Whitaker should have at least been nominated for his performance. Eastwood should have been recognized for Best Director too. At least the Academy has made up for it in recent years by awarding these two with Oscars for other projects, but still. I understand 1988 was a competitive year for acting, but come on, Forrest could have taken Tom Hank's slot for Big.

reply

I do feel that this film needed more recognition at awards.

Its that man again!!

reply

??? This muddle of a film should never have ever been released. From the horrible script to the horrid directing. Baaad, and not in a good way.

The truth is spoken here.

reply

My favorite film. The Academy has recognized British films, but when it comes to Americans and Blacks! Listen, the academy has a category named foreign language films. what?. so all the british are not foreigners? Give me a break. it should stimulate films period. so english films are the best? the academy is not worth that name. it promotes british and not americans. it's sad, because we could surely use their acknowledgement that american films are excellent and promote our land. we could surely use the advertisement. . This is my favorite film. again.

reply