MovieChat Forums > Beetlejuice (1988) Discussion > An F-bomb in a PG movie

An F-bomb in a PG movie


I'm rewatching the movie right now and it amazes me this happened in a PG movie. Movies were so much better in the 80s.

https://youtu.be/SrMiCYi7I00

reply

It happens more than you think. But there are restrictions:
https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/using-the-f-word-in-pg-1312a-movies/

reply

Oh I know I just thought it would be worth mentioning. That just doesn't happen in a PG movie.

reply

It certainly doesn't happen today but at the time during the mid-late 80s PG-13 was still a relatively new rating system, created largely because of movie violence. So during that adjustment period, PG movies still pushed the boundaries of what would even be allowed in a PG-13 movie these days. Beetlejuice was definitely one of those movies. You pretty much never see the equivalent to the "Nice f*ckin mode" crotch grabbing scene in PG-13 movies today even but PG? No chance.

The distinct new formula for PG and PG-13 movies didn't really find its footing until the 1990s The last PG-13 movie I recall to really push boundaries in terms of crude adult humor would be the 1996 film Kingpin that was later re rated R

reply

Funnily enough PG-13 did exist at the time. But it was not used often. Now a days most PG movies are animated films.

reply

PG-13 did in fact exist when Beetlejuice came out. I believe Red Dawn, released in August of 1984, was the first film released with that rating.

Honestly though, even with the dynamic between how they decided if something was going to be PG or PG-13 taking several years to find it’s footing, I think Beetlejuice was quite a borderline case based on its content, and I can only assume that the MPAA just simply liked the movie and went lenient on it for that reason.

Dispute having some morbid stuff in it (AND the single F-bomb, which WAS allowed in PG movies back then in the same fashion that they are allowed in PG-13 movies now) Beetlejuice is quite a charming movie that can appeal to children, while actually addressing the subject of death and afterlife in a way that, I’d actually seriously say, is in a healthy and palatable manner. I don’t know if that’s what they were going for with the movie, but I truly think it is a good introduction to such mature topics for younger kids.

That’s why I’m thinking the MPAA genuinely liked the movie, and probably looked at it more favorably than certain other teen movies of the mid-80’s like say, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, which got a PG-13 in 1986. The MPAA has been known for DECADES to play favorites with how they certify films, and go extra hard on films they look down their noses at.

reply

"Barry Lyndon" (1975) was Rated G but had nudity, sexual situations, and violence. I also think "Romeo & Juliet" (1968) was Rated G as well but had the same explicit content.

reply

yea, anyone that takes these ratings seriously is an idiot!
This is all political.
If you see the aviator there is a scene showing how scamming it is.

reply

PG means "Parental Guidance Suggested" which is why the parent should be supervising their young children in a movie where there's an F-word.

reply

Wait, Beetlejuice is only PG? The MPAA must've been confused the day they rated this and thought it was still 1978.

As for 'fuck', it's not allowed in PG (except when they're sleeping on the job, I guess) and even in PG-13 you're only allowed one and it can't be a sexual "fuck". Of course I'm sure they've slipped on that too sometimes.

Edit: I just went to the ratings site and this movie might've broke them. They rated it as Beetle Juice, a mistake only made by people who've heard of the film but have never seen it.

reply

PG-13 is such a redundant and stupid rating. When a rating says "Parental Guidance Suggested, some material may be inappropriate for children" I really don't see what's so hard about this? This means there may be an F-bomb, or a heart being ripped out of a guys chest, or a couple of shots of a woman's breasts. Parents just need to be more informed about what their children are watching and not just use the TV as a babysitter. I mean what's next? Do we also need a PG-10, PG-12 and PG-15 ratings also?

reply

Do we also need a PG-10, PG-12 and PG-15 ratings also?

Sort of. I mean, if it were me making the call, there would only be two ratings. G and R. The R would be augmented with a specific age for all non-G films. So it could be R-6, R-10, R-18 or whatever. Having the ratings encompass age groups just doesn't make sense to me and it leads to a lot of censorship. Like, there's a lot of grey area between PG-13 and R and a film for 15 year olds will get an R and then be cut down to qualify for a PG-13. I'd rather give it an R-15 to begin with and forget the trimming. It'd be easier just to have a uniform system where 'restricted' is a single rating with a number instead of this alphabet soup of PG-13 or NC-17 (wtf? did 'A' make too much sense for them?).

reply

We only need 4 ratings:

- G - It may not be 100% family friendly but there's nothing in there that would warrant parental supervision, also not exclusively a kids/family film (2001: A Space Odyssey, Despicable Me, Planet Of The Apes, It Happened One Night, Casablanca, your typical Disney film)

- PG - Parental Guidance is suggested for younger viewers, may be inappropriate for small children (Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands, The Dark Knight, Indiana Jones, James Bond, Harry Potter, Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Jurassic Park)

- R - Restricted, children under 17 need parental supervision (Robocop, Die Hard, Terminator, your typical gangster film, Alien, Schindler's List, Saturday Night Fever, One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest)

- X/NC-17 - Inappropriate for children under 17 under any circumstance, has extreme/over the top sex or violence (Wolf of Wall Street, Boogie Nights, Cannibal Holocaust, Human Centipede 2 and 3, Porn)

reply

[deleted]

Oh I was just trying to be generous, I'm fine with only two ratings.

reply

all the sexual references, and pedofilla was allowed along with death as long as it appears cartoony.

who am I kidding? they probably bought it off.

reply

f bombs like this were added so the dad watching the movie with his family can have a good laugh.

reply

You Americans are hilarious! You (well not all of you) think a boob or the word fuck will damage your kids (and some grownups) And F-bomb? f-word? everyone nows what it stands for so just use "fuck".

reply

I don't have a problem with it. It's surprising for a PG movie.

reply

That's because your parents didn't wash your mouth with soap often enough to teach you not to cuss.

reply

Not anymore. Kids these days they go around dropping F bombs as casually as they breathe before they graduate first grade. I call it progress.

reply

Things were different in the 80s.

reply