Was Jim Malone corrupt?


He had bottles of hard liquor at his house.

"Don't cry, it is to be. In time, I'll take away your miseries and make 'em mine...D'Evils."

reply

Yeah, that's something I thought about the first time I saw the film. Possibly, he could have taken them from a bust, rather than having bought them straight from a gangster. But that would still make him kind of a hypocrite, because he's using his police connections to get something that's illegal for everyone else.

Actually, that issue kind of sums up the whole problem I have with cheering on prohibition agents. Throughout society, there seemed to be this shared understanding that prohibition was turning out to be a bad idea, and that there was really nothing wrong with having a few drinks, yet we're supposed to regard these G-Men as heroes for enforcing a bad law.

reply

He was Irish! Whattday expect? But anyways, I think he knew it was a BS law, and that it wouldn't last, and he probably didn't care that the guy next door was putting something in his coffee as well, but the fact that Capone was killing people in the streets over it made it his problem. I wouldn't say he was corrupt, but he certainly knew where the corruption was.

reply

Are you Irish? Then what the *beep* do you know about it?

reply

that's a very typecast racist remark

reply

There's an Irish race?

reply

It was a joke for one. And we know that the Irish culture doesn’t shun drinking.

reply

It's an ethnicity, you sjws need to calm down.

reply

In context of this movie Malone pouring himself whiskey and Wallace sipping out of the bullet hole of a barrel shows them as guncrazy honchos, willing to kick some Italian ass. They don't obey the law they try to uphold. It's all good humor for them. On the other hand, had the tone of this movie been less pophollywood, it'd be totally appropriate for these characters to indulge in whiskey drinking.

------------------------
dance godammit

reply

After 9/11 you couldn't take photos of any of the bridges in NYC, signs were posted on every span.
Yet on shows like CSI NY every week we saw shots of the bridges. It was a stupid law as the plans for every span in the world are a matter of public record.
For many years you could NOT take photos on the subway and yet many did (me too)
kind of hard to enforce as the police can't be on every station/train ditto for the bridges.
Also a stupid law.

See some stars here
http://www.vbphoto.biz/

reply

The fact that Capone had people killed for refusing to participate in the liquor business made him and his people/connections targets for and was the Untouchables' real motivation. Frankly, I don't really care what people want to put in their own body, as long as they don't force anyone else to do so, and the only time I care about broken laws is when they result in actual harm/damage being done, when they don't I say let bygones be bygones.

reply

[deleted]

It is interesting to note that everyone who is seen drinking on camera is killed at some point in the film.

reply

Malone is seen having a drink from a hidden bottle in his apartement, which looks different to the bootleg stock. I have always suspected it was an original from the home country, which is how he could justify it. I do not think Malone was corrupt , although he had no problem with cutting legal corners and carrying a razor, in fact I think the reason he is still on the beat is that he refused to take part in the take and was ostracised by the rest of the force.

reply

It wasn't illegal to own or drink liquer it was just illeagal to transport or sell it.

reply

You could even make small amounts of certain drinks for personal use. Prohibition was more about the commercial activity than personal behavior.

Think of it like a friendly, low-stakes game of poker among friends when casinos are illegal. Hypocritical? I guess, but there are worse things in life than hypocrisy.

reply


The whole concept of the film - battling prohibition - is just ripe for absurd moral hypocrisy - check Costner's final line in the film.

The film doesn't miss a chance to really illustrate how ridiculous the whole battle is - watch Charles Martin Smith grabbing a shwank of whiskey from the truck, Malone pouring himself a drink, etc. The film has to set apart the "true" villains in the film by showing a little girl getting blown up at the beginning of the film - talk about stacking the deck!

Sometimes "The Untouchables" is maddeningly obtuse - its sort of carefree attitude on the whole morality of prohibition and Ness's fight is almost parenthetical - i.e. (yeah, we know all this is *beep* but he killed a girl with a bomb! So he's the real bad guy - get it?)

Please nest your IMDB page, and respond to the correct person -

reply

(yeah, we know all this is *beep* but he killed a girl with a bomb! So he's the real bad guy - get it?)

---

But she represented the "means to the end" aspect of his business. Killing her didn't matter as "collateral damage." Killing Ness's wife and child with intent was Capone's unsuccessful expressed desire. Using crooked cops to facilitate the murder of honest cops(on the Untouchables team) was Capone's desire successfully achieved. And (based on an actual incident), we saw Capone beat in the head of an underling with a baseball bat on the basis of unsubstantiated paranoia.

Once an enterprise is criminal...criminals enter in. And behave like criminals.

reply

[deleted]