MovieChat Forums > Slumber Party Massacre II (1987) Discussion > Is T.J. funny or annoying...? and a thou...

Is T.J. funny or annoying...? and a thought on the writing...


The first time I saw this movie, I thought that T.J. was a rather lame choice for one of the lead boyfriends and that he contributed to the overall weakness of the movie, but as I watched it again and again, I realized that he is actually quite funny - Does anyone agree, or is he just annoying? The more you watch it, the more it seems that the actor's personality fits in perfectly with the lines written for the character.

It's also interesting that the writer and director, Deborah Brock, used the word "uptight" for T.J. so many times. "Uptight" must be of her vocabulary, you know, how some people have distinctive vocabularies...

I get the sense that the writing and Brock's imagining of how the movie was going to be somehow did not match up with the finished product, which is intriguing because the writer and director are the same person. Anyone else get that sense? The movie starts out promising - the first 20 minutes are good - and then sometime after they've gotten to the house it seems to fall apart. Maybe the setting, the house itself, is a drawback - I mean, the walls are barren, there's no color, and it takes place in the desert.

Anyone have any thoughts they want to contribute?

reply

I think TJ is hilarious because of how annoying he is. It'd be pretty dull if every single character in a movie was likable and nice. Same goes for Franklin in the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre. I've enjoyed Joel Hoffman in his horror outings (Pumkinhead, Slaughterhouse) too bad he didn't do more.

I collect dead pigeons then I press them between the pages of a book.

reply

How's your headache?


http://www.cgonzales.net & http://www.drxcreatures.com

reply

TJ's jokes are actually pretty clever & funny,
& his wit is faster than any of the other numskulls he hangs around

reply