MovieChat Forums > The Secret of My Succe$s (1987) Discussion > Was this just marketed badly? Is that it...

Was this just marketed badly? Is that it?


Because NO ONE I know (old and young alike) has ever heard of this movie. Most films have a "Reception" section on their Wikipedia page - all this one has is the plot. The rating is a sad 6.1 on IMDb, and barely anyone has discussed it.

So, what was it? Aside from the over-the-top '80s synth instrumentals and recycled power ballads that drowned out the dialogue in some parts, what else was there that really suffocated this film into obscurity?

reply

Believe it or not, this was a pretty popular film in 1987. It made something like $60M at the U.S Box Office. That may not sound like much these days, but it was enough to put the film on the top 10 highest earners of that year. I think maybe the reason some people have forgotten about it, was because it was such an unashamed film of it's time. It perfectly sums up that "Greed is Good" ethos of the mid-late 80's, without being the damning cautionary tale that Wall Street was. As a result, that film has developed a classic status, because it perfectly summed up what happened to a lot of those people in the real world, where as this film is a bit more Disney-fied. At the same time, it isn't quite bad enough to obtain "camp classic" status in the same way a lot of other 80's movies have. I think its a testimate to Michael J Fox's charisma and huge popularity at the time, that this did as well as it it.

Obviously, you're not a golfer!

reply

https://thedissolve.com/features/forgotbusters/351-the-secret-of-my-success-distills-1987-down-to-its/

The Secret Of My Success was a hit, but its success ultimately proved just as empty and meaningless as that of its sketchily written, lovably played protagonist. The film won the box-office battle back in 1987, but history has not been kind to it. Even as 1980s nostalgia-porn, it’s strangely dull. Fox’s charisma ultimately cut both ways: It made this flimsy piece of formula a big hit, but it also highlighted the need for roles that did justice to his extraordinary talent, instead of coasting on it.

reply

Some posters seem to miss the point that this was not a movie with a lesson. It was purely a comedy, and a rather classically scripted one. It's much more like a 30's comedy than many 80s comedies were. But, if you're looking for the "corporate lesson", they DID take down the guy who cared nothing for his employees and put inventive and sensible corporate practice into place ... at least insofar as screenwriters can imagine the concepts.

reply

This was a very popular movie, and Michael J Fox a bankable star at the time.

reply

Well, I remember this well enough. Actually a friend from my class saw it on the movies and recommended it. I missed it, but rented it, and saw it lke 5 times with my friends. Good stuff back in the day.

Wikipedia says it made well over 100 million internationally back in 1987, so it was a huge success. But the previous post made a good point: this falls in between "so good it's bad" and "true 80s classics" movies. Also, against Wall street the yuppie - thing is kind of twisted and nowadays definitely outdated.

Movies like Explorers, Innerspace, Adventures in babysitting and Miracle on the 8th street get found out easier because they have names like Spielberg, Dante and Chris Columbus attached to them. And I won't even mention John Hughes here.

Secret of my success must be one of the biggest "forgotten" blockbusters of the 80s. It's as easy to miss as, say, My science project, Real Genius and D.A.R.Y.L. - but those movies didn't make 100 million dollars.

reply

I was 21 when it came out and while I didn't frequent movies anyway, I remember it was just about the time of Michael J. Fox overkill. He did Back To the Future to Teen Wolf so now seeing him do the Wall Street deal, he and it was an overtried, overused formula.

I recorded it earlier this week and am watching it now and the opening music, his voice, his explanation of just going to New York, all the beautiful women turning and looking 'at him', it was massive overkill.

I think it was comedian Rich Hall who compared all the Tom Cruise movies around this time as all being virtually the same, from Top Gun to Cocktail and whatever else there may have been.

I remember this movie being promoted with the scene of MJF in his briefs flexing his muscles when the elevator opened. This scene was used to entice people to see it.

Yea, I would say that was bad marketing, if the movie actually has something more going for it.

reply

I remember this movie being very successful when it came out. I was only 11 but I remember the audience enjoying it.

I think it's a pleasant film, nothing more really. It's not as good as Back to the Future, which is now considered a classic. I think "Secret" capitalized on MJF's success but it doesn't have that enduring appeal that some of his other films have.

Something like Cocktail is just as forgettable but Tom Cruise was arguably a bigger star and the Cocktail soundtrack was huge so it had more of a presence.

reply

There’s just something odd about this movie….the way it looks….the cast, etc. Not that it necessarily looks cheaply produced…..but maybe it just looks like it was produced in Canada or something.

None of the cast is very recognizable except MJF. The music and tone are a bit odd….the score, the sense of comedy, etc.

It’s kinda like the difference between SNL and that comedy troupe from Canada (the one that gave us Rick Moranis, John Canada, Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara, etc). The Canada troupe just seemed….decent, but not as good….and with a different sense of comedy. A different tone.

Kinda like the difference between something like Groundhog Day….and one of those annoying movies like Best in Show. (Do people actually like that movie?)

I can’t quite put my finger on it. The Secret of My Success was decent….but just a bit…”off”, cheaper-looking, and not nearly as good as say…Back to the Future.

reply

Parts of it seem a bit more 'made for TV' and twice the actors give themselves away as Canadian by saying "Sore-ee!" (MJF being one of them).

reply

It did seem like a cheap film despite the cast.

reply

This film embraced what Oliver Stone's "Wall Street" failed to denounce

reply

I saw it at the time and thought it was ok but average. I haven't seen it since but I think it just gets lost in all the similar (and better) yuppie films of the time.

reply