MovieChat Forums > Hell Comes to Frogtown (1988) Discussion > Just shy of being a softcore porn

Just shy of being a softcore porn


All it needs is a little more sex and a little more nudity and Roddy Piper would be a softcore porn actor.

reply

Been a while since I saw it but I don't remember much nudity.

http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/classic_60s_scifi/

reply

There was barely any nudity at all. I can't even remember a single sex scene. The OP's just a whiner.

reply

Read my original post, I said all it needs is more sex and nudity to be a softcore porn. I'm not whining...I love sex and nudity.

I mean the story line and bad acting seems like that of a softcore porn movie.

reply

This film did in fact begin life as a hardcore pornography movie but when Roddy Piper showed interest in the script sexual elements were toned down. I'd like to see it though...

reply

Dude:
"A little more sex and a little more nudity", and Bambi would be soft core porn.

Next time you have a thought? Just let it go.

..Joe

reply

Dude, I had the thought 4 years ago. It's been let go.

reply

[deleted]

The concept of the movie (one macho male is the only fertile male left in a world full of horny, hot women), the poor production quality and poor acting seem more fitting for a softcore porn than a regular movie.

That's all I'm saying, raise your masturbation standards. This is a 1988 Roddy Piper movie, surely you can find something better than that to milk to. #imdbmessageboardfightsareawesome

reply

[deleted]

ok buddy, congratulations, you win. now go look for an IMDB argument on the "Sorority Babes in the Slimeball Bowl-O-Rama" message board that you may be able to win.

reply

Future prospective viewers should know that this is not even close porn. It's not even a close to a T&A movie. There is more sex is virtually every mainstream movie. This is children's movie.

reply

And future viewers should know that porn is much more easily acsessable on the Internet. This isn't 1992, people jerk off over real porn. If you see this movie based on a post that says "just shy of soft core porn", again, I'll have to say...you need to raise your masturbation standards. True Softcofe porn shouldn't even be an option nowadays.

reply

[deleted]

What is wrong with you? Even you agree that it is not porn, soft porn, or almost porn. And yet you keep defending your original statement -- which you agree does not make sense.

Adjust your meds, dude.

reply

The *beep* are you suggesting? That "real porn" didn't exist prior to 1992? Which seems like a really random date to pull out of thin air.

The new home of Welcome to Planet Bob: http://kingofbob.blogspot.ca/

reply

[deleted]

Only one actress bares her breasts in this film. That's not nearly enough gratuitous naked boobage for this movie to qualify as softcore porn.

I'm a totally bitchin' bio writer from Mars!

reply

Dumbest thread ever.
They show some tits for a total of maybe 20 seconds.
Not sure if trolling.

--
^Signature is below here
<-- I'm the first to ever use this icon

reply

No chance, we didn't even get to see Froggies 3 snakes 😀

--------------------
Duty Now For The Future

reply

No chance, we didn't even get to see Froggies 3 snakes 😀


And I so wanted to see them 

R.I.P. Rick Ducommun and Tony Longo

reply

Have you ever in your life even seen a softcore porn? A few boobs flashing on the screen does not a porn make.

The new home of Welcome to Planet Bob: http://kingofbob.blogspot.ca/

reply