I unfortunately agree about Mr. Malkovich. While he is a very interesting actor, he is usually more miss than hit. In Paul Newman's extremely-faithful-to-the-source-material-but-way-off-in-casting-choices-version of Glass Menagerie, I believe all the actors to be more of a curio than archetype.
John Malkovich is, as I said, interesting, but he is, in my opinion, in the same mold as William Shatner; weird. But as the Shatman is strangely likeable, often overlooked as good (when you get past the cosmically deranged iambic pentamiter) while being weird, Malkovich is just weird. Never likeable in the sense of "wouldn't it be fun to hang out with (insert-Malkovich-character name HERE)?".
"Eye have....thingzinnn meye pocketseyeeee....havethingzup...my sleeeeeeevebut...eyeyammmtheeee....oPPositeofayyyy stage magishiunnnnn..."
Malkovich looks the part, but his interpretation of Tom is as if he not only "went much further" than the moon (as directed by his equally weird mommy Amanda), but that he jumped off the ride somewhere and hoofed it around the Andromeda system before coming back to Earth and telling us about his 'memory' play.
Woodward acts as if some piece of wood became animated for a couple hours...stilted and overreaching for a goal while simultaneously being extremely schreechy and irritating. And poor Karen Allen, looking about 15 years older than her tormented character of Laura, and coming off about as sympathetic as a lamppost. And James Naughton...I mean, James Naughton?? He must have divorced a wife of at least 10 years and then become a gentleman caller? I had the most sympathy for the damn unicorn that lost his horn.
It's too bad this wonderful, WONDERFUL 20th century classic hasn't found a proper home on the screen. But then, perhaps it's supposed to remain in it's only house...the stage.
reply
share