MovieChat Forums > Cherry 2000 (1988) Discussion > Failing To See One Thing

Failing To See One Thing


After reading most of the posts here, everyone is convinced Cherry 2000 was a sex robot. But if you pay attention to some of the lines of the movie, and the early scene in the glu glu club. I feel that he was truely inlove with Cherry and not just using her as a sex slave. For him, the idea of going into those clubs going through all that fake impersonal drama of filling out paper work, having demo reels, and the whole "business" of finding a woman, was unromantic. He could actually sit down and talk to Cherry without all that, she in fact was more "real" than the human women. That being all he could see around him is what drew him to the androids. once she broke he could have just upgraded her, or gotten a new one, but he didnt he fought to get her back, confirming he did feel a deep love for her. It wasn't until he met E that he finnaly saw a human woman that wasnt like any he had seen in the cities. He finds a woman that the Cherry Model was based on, in some way he found a real Cherry 2000, which may be why she was given that cherry red hair color.

There are other scenes too where you can see the dept of his feelings for Cherry. Like when his coworkers are trying to get him to go to the bars with them, stating "so you lost your robot" you can see the pain in his face when they say that line. think of it this way. when you loose a pet your sad, why? its just an animal. but because you've spent so much time with it, it becomes part of the family and you love it. the same thing in the movie. But with a human body, and the ability to talk and think, feelings are able to turn into love and affection.

reply

There are other scenes too where you can see the dept of his feelings for Cherry. Like when his coworkers are trying to get him to go to the bars with them, stating "so you lost your robot" you can see the pain in his face when they say that line. think of it this way. when you loose a pet your sad, why? its just an animal. but because you've spent so much time with it, it becomes part of the family and you love it. the same thing in the movie. But with a human body, and the ability to talk and think, feelings are able to turn into love and affection.
Good point Hatter....Even though Cherry 2000 is a low budget exploitation film, it does touch upon a philosophical question ( what it is to be human) the human condition....If an android/robot displays emotions, is it any different than a human? It's obvious from the begining of the film that Sam is in love with Cherry, because she is there emotionally for him. And your right about the women in this 2017 world, real bitches, I hope it never comes to the point where you have to sign an attorney/client document before you can go on a date....He does fall in love with E later in the film, but I got a hunch he'll never forget his Cherry 2000.




"Lo fa, ne-ko shi-ma,de va-ja blade ... BLADE RUNNER."



reply

I agree. I did a new thread on this called "Seems like two movies in one" saying basically that the first half of the movie seemed to be saying Cherry has trancended her programming to become more that a robot and then in the second half of the film it switches around saying she is no worth saving compared to E.

Of course, I don't really expect deep thinking out of a low budget Scifi film, but this seems to me to be a big inconsistancy in the script.

reply

I don't really think there's any evidence she transcended her programming. Even at the beginning of the movie she's petty shallow and has obvious standard responses to stimuli. I think it's more a matter that a lonely Sam sees her as transcending her programming because of his infatuation.

reply

I don't think he is really in love with Cherry, but in love with the idea of real love. In the end he knows it isn't *real* but he can't find the type of woman he wants in the society that he lives in. Cherry is the closest thing to a real woman that he can find...

Until he goes out beyond his surroundings.

I can imagine that many men in that society are that way, wanting something more then sex; an actual connection with another women.

You could equate it with many noble families in the medieval ages: They often didn't marry for love...it was business. However many of them sought love and often in the arms of other people.


"God is Dead" Nietzsche
"Nietzsche is dead" God

reply

[deleted]

This is a nice thread. It perceptively touches on some of the themes of the movie that we tried to make. And some of those we'll revisit as we consider a new version.

reply

That was part of the parable or "morality" in the film. If you think about it, the movie is almost a "womens liberation" kind of film, but not in the sense that Griffith's character shoots guns and drives a rocking car, but in the sense that she isn't a stay at home traditional housewife, which at the time was an image that a lot of women had issues with.

To complete my thought; just as the girl of the 40s and 50s was programmed to be a housewife, so it was that Cherry 2000 was programmed to please whoever owned her. But regardless Sam appreciated the care, regardless of where it came from.

And I think that's the hidden lesson for both sexes.

reply