MovieChat Forums > Heartbreak Ridge (1986) Discussion > This movie belongs in the toilet!

This movie belongs in the toilet!


So I was watching AMC or some other channel and this crap fest of a movie came on. It was by far one of the most terrible, cheesy, and stupid movies I have ever seen!

I managed to sit through 30 minutes of it, watching Clint Eastwood mumble words, like he has throat cancer or something? All the lines were incredibly stupid and the only actor of notoriety in the movie was Clint. All the other actors were probably recruited at a hotdog eating contest or some other event where mindless idiots gather around to make stupid jokes.
I almost died laughing when I saw Clint and his Marines with their guns at waist level trying to shoot the bad guys in Grenada.

Who ever directed & produced this movie should be in prison.
This movie is criminally bad.

reply

haahahaha, your post was spot on!! I saw this movie not too long ago and I could barely sit through it all myself. Clint Eastwood must be a heavy smoker because it did sound like he had throat cancer or some kinda throat problem. Overall it was a horrible movie and a waste of time..

reply

I went through training on how to shoot from the hip. The M-16 is not a very accurate weapon, but it can spit out rounds like nobody's business. I remember walking through a field and having targets pop up. We were taught to fire quickly, not accurately. Later, when I was walking through a field and real guys popped up, I shot back with that same technique. I don't recall anybody laughing.

When I was taught how to fire from a foxhole, I was taught to "lay down a field of fire." If I shot where I was supposed to shoot, and if everybody else did their job, it would be darn near impossible for the enemy to advance. We sprayed bullets.

I was initially taught to fire my weapon as a civilian thought it should be fired. Take a breath, release it slowly, squeeze the trigger. We never used that technique anywhere but on the rifle range when we were qualifying. In real life, the most important technique that you needed was the ability to swap magazines quickly.

In my day, the M-16s had two settings: single shot and full rock and roll. So another technique that was needed was the ability to fire at someone without draining a full mag on one target. Nowadays, they have the scared sh+tless setting so that you don't waste your ammo on one target. I could have used that setting.

In cowboy movies, the old gunfighter goes on and on about how being fast is great but being accurate is better. Not us. We laid down fire fast and furious. You sweep the weapon through the target. If the target is still moving, you reload and begin again.

reply

Later, when I was walking through a field and real guys popped up, I shot back with that same technique. I don't recall anybody laughing.

Well you had me laughing with that comment. Hope I never run into you in a dark jungle.

Thanks for passing on your experiences.

reply

[deleted]

No offense, bro, but you're an idiot. If I can hit a target from 500 yards center-mass 8 times out of 10, it's pretty friggin accurate. The whole argument between the M-16 and the AK47 is the rate of fire and accuracy. The AK47 wins by a land-slide in rate of fire but the M-16 is FAR more accurate. To say that the M-16 is not accurate is just ignorant. Prone to jamming, yes, inaccurate, no.

reply

The AK47 wins by a land-slide in rate of fire...

I hate to burst your bubble but the M-16 can fire 700-950 rds/min but the AK-47 only 600. That would make the M-16 a winner by not exactly a landslide but a significant margin.
...but the M-16 is FAR more accurate.

No argument here.
To say that the M-16 is not accurate is just ignorant.

The OP didn't say the M-16 wasn't accurate he was just relating his experience with his training and use of an M-16 in the context of how it was used in the movie so calling him an idiot is a bit over the top.

reply

500 yards is pretty far for an M-16. It's not far for other weapons. If you can hit a target at 500 yards, you are a good shot with a weapon that was not designed for long distance. Plenty of weapons made before 1900 were much more accurate.

reply

Ok I'm no expert,but you are one hellava shot. Correct me if I'm wrong but the biggest difference between the M16 and the AK47 is caliber right? M16 = more (smaller) rounds on target. The AK = more carnage but less accurate.



reply

Started out good but ran into the ground 20 minutes in.


"People scare better when they're dying"
Frank , OATITW




reply

Some movies just arent designed to stand the test of time. I saw this at the theater 25yrs ago and it was a pretty kickass movie. Watching it today on AMC I catch myself thinking "holy hell is this cheesy".

Interestingly there are a lot of movies from the late 80's (The Live and Shocker to name two) that I remembered being such cool movies only to see them recently and wonder what the hell I was thinking at the time.

reply