MovieChat Forums > Clockwise (1986) Discussion > Poorly executed and excruciatingly slow.

Poorly executed and excruciatingly slow.


Before I start I just want to say that I'm a *massive* fan of Cleese and virtually all of his work, from his acting performances to his work behind the camera. I'm very fond of so much of his filmography, from the Python series and films, to A Fish Called Wanda to Fierce Creatures and of course, the near perfect Fawlty Towers.

Because of this, I was recommended Clockwise.

I was expecting a feature-length symphony of chaos and Cleese-humour; Fawlty Towers, but given a budget and a 100 minute run time to wreak havoc for Cleese's character.

However, Clockwise is anything but.

The biggest problem with the film is its pacing. It is almost unbelievably slow. Of course, a slow buildup is often a benefit in such comedies; the story and circumstances slowly burn towards a riotous explosion of comedy, like Fawlty Towers has so often done. But in those instances, the slowness worked because we were always aware of the threat, of the tension, of the promise of what trouble is bubbling below the surface. In the case of this film however, I was bored almost to the point of turning off the movie.

Clockwise features entire scenes where characters do essentially nothing, or engage in so-called 'antics' that are virtually free of tension, suspense or humour. The scenes in the monastery, in the country fields, in the phone box or by the side of the road completely drain the film's energy. The very point of the movie is for us to feel the importance of every second tick by, to race against time, to be terrified of the prospect of being late--of missing the engagement. However, although Cleese's character is set up to be bordering on near obsession with these things, by the midway point he has seemingly abandoned these qualities and drifts through the film, even remarking that he doesn't care anymore. This character trait change is completely unprecedented, and makes no sense, to say nothing of how it drains the film of drama and comedy. I won't even touch on the bizarre and absurd sequence in which Cleese and his student take another man into the woods to steal his clothes by offering sex. It's barely usable in theory, and in execution, the scene is utterly groan-inducing.

The second major problem refers to the characters themselves and the way the film handles them. An entire slew of supporting characters are introduced (badly and uninterestingly), each of them supposedly being set up to antagonise and confound Cleese when he finally arrives. After we spend the whole film slowly and numbingly reaching Cleese's engagement, these characters are virtually forgotten, merely wandering into his speech session to distract him for a moment before being seated. The explosion of comedy and awkward confrontation, as was done so marvelously in A Fish Called Wanda, Fierce Creatures and Fawlty Towers, never occurs at all. The film's climax barely even occurs, and when it does, it's merely signposted by Cleese giving a bizarrely disjointed speech; a scene which doesn't seem to know whether it's suggesting that Cleese has lost his mind, or is merely winging it. Frankly, at this point, I didn't care. The subplots and ultimate conclusion of the story are never resolved. The film simply stops. Having Cleese's character no longer caring is fine, but this fact is never properly established.

Finally, the performances are either painful or boring. Everyone but Cleese seems to have turned their 'annoying-stereotype' meter up to eleven, screeching, whining and giggling in the most absurd ways. Meanwhile, Cleese himself plays the film surprisingly straight and subdued, barely every reaching his trademark levels of Basil Fawlty hysteria. This, despite the fact that he finds himself in situations that would make Fawlty collapse in agony. Naturally, I understand that we are dealing with different characters here, but since the film goes to such arduous lengths in the first act to set up Cleese's neurosis, the fact that he sleepwalks through the rest of the film is genuinely bizarre.

Ultimately, Clockwise is incredibly disappointing, and, despite the apparent love of it in certain circles, I feel should be avoided at all costs.

It's begging for a remake to inject some tension, suspense and genuine comedy into this simple concept.

reply

"The very point of the movie is for us to feel the importance of every second tick by, to race against time, to be terrified of the prospect of being late--of missing the engagement."

I disagree completely. The film is a character study of a person who has regimented his life to an arbitrary measure - the clock. The major points that I took away from it are: (POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD)

1) Small mistakes can snowball into big consequences if one is not flexible and self-aware.
2) When one steers to a particular course without regard for other people, it throws off the balance of the universe which they inhabit.
3) It is futile to pursue control.

Fawly Towers, Fish called Wanda and Fierce Creatures are enjoyable entertainment, but they are not sophisticated works of art, like Clockwise is.

"Any lie will find believers as long as you tell it with force."

reply

You actually mean to call the scene in the forest with some of the most deplorable acting in British cinema "art"? Don't make me laugh.

reply

I partly agree with the second post and completely disagree with the first. Clockwise has a few scenes and a few moments of acting that are really dodgy. The scene in the woods needed editing and didn't feel natural (would the suited character really have been led in there?). But John Cleese' performance and that climax of story lines were both fantastic.

In style, this movie follows the same pattern as One Foot In The Grave, and Fawlty Towers, and I suspect fans of either of those would directly enjoy this.

I do however agree it was slow through the middle, though I thought the beginning was actually very good. The climax of the movie was just brilliance though, and the old ladies in the background was just laugh-out-loud funny.

The farmer was genius too.

reply

Its fine as it is!
If you dont like it, dont watch it.

reply


Same can be said about the message pointing out this movie's faults.

The message is fine as it is!

If you don't like it, don't read it.

reply

It is an ENGLISH film and might even suffer by the lead character being acted by John Cleese because nowadays he is so strongly associated with Basil Fawlty an "over the top" English hotelier, trying to be normal in a bizarre world, in an hotel he runs with his equally ridiculous class laden wife and has a half witted, trying too hard to please waiter who cannot understand the language of the people with whom he works.

English folk of my generation are more familiar with Cleese trying to play a straight man in sketches that go back to 1960s black & white (in UK) TV in such as The Frost Report - or before that - where I particularly remember him on Radio - "I am sorry I'll read that again" - still rebroadcast from time to time on BBC Radio 4 Extra and possibly other stations also - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b009zbr2

The undressing scene is a weak plot device to get him re-clothed again, having had him leave his clothes at the monastery.

In a way the monastery episode - not the bathing and clothes losing business, but rather the idea of a contemplative monastery - where in fact they do speak after all - but only when they have got something relevant to say -unlike much of UK life nowadays - where we have TV commentators - telling people what they are looking at (My grouse about the Winter Olympic's coverage that I have mostly avoided these past weeks) - but the disparity of life in a monastery, compared to the contrived nature of much communication - is the whole point of the film - more so than the clock watching business.

The film might have benefited from another name, which does not focus the viewer on the obsession with time keeping being the major issue under comedic examination but rather the whole British class system as it affects domestic life and especially public education.

reply

Ultimately, Clockwise is incredibly disappointing, and, despite the apparent love of it in certain circles, I feel should be avoided at all costs.


I respect your opinion but a LOT of people (myself included) love this movie. Giving advise like this is presumptuous at best.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

Cleese' best work ever outside Fawlty Towers and one of the funniest films ever made.

Cleese himself later said that it was not for Americans.

Why was it great? Largely because the screenplay was written by Michael Frayn, a major playwright and novelist of our times.

reply

i think it's funny, but a bit painful to watch, as Cleese's character becomes more and more desperate and does more and more crazy things to try and get to his objective. I can't help thinking about the aftermath - whtaever will happen to him? But it has some very funny scenes, I don't find it slow.

reply

Failing to grasp the concept and pacing of this movie is a trait of the individual who is not British. If born here they are second generation and are not able to grasp the subtle idiosyncrasies of British humour. They are far more happy watching slapstick, foot in the wallpaper paste bucket, getting hit in the face with a dead fish and so on. A brilliantly paced movie, don't expect action and titilation, do expect British humour at its very best ;)

reply

I put this film on at our village theatre tonight-the audience laughed their heads off! On of John Cleese's funniest. Packed with well-known actors as well.

reply