MovieChat Forums > Absolute Beginners (1986) Discussion > Dismissed it at the time but it's kind o...

Dismissed it at the time but it's kind of fun


I remember being excited for another film with David Bowie whom I was crazy about back then age 12, but when I saw he wasn't the main character and it was a musical I decided not to see it. It came on tonight on Turner Classic Movies and some of the numbers are a lot of fun and surprisingly creative. I had a very different impression of Britain's popular culture from films of the 50s and 60s than is shown here and Absolute Beginners does seem a bit unreal or in fact surreal. When I think of the film Victim coming out in 1961 that doesn't seem like the same country depicted here. It's also odd how the film starts out surreal and stylized and doesn't ask us to take anything in it seriously throughout most of the film and then becomes a serious anti-racist message movie towards the end. It's as if they took two movies and pasted them together. When they had a racist rally I turned it off.

reply

Its stylized but the critics at the time were unhappy with the lack of story. I think the leads needed to be stronger actors and more substance would had helped.

Its that man again!!

reply

The critics were correct! It had a flimsy story.

I too watched this because of Bowie; I was a HUGE fan of his then! His role was small though.

What didn't help the story was all the ridiculous crotch-grabbing! Every other scene showed either a woman or a man grabbing some guy's package, ugh!
Its a story of a jilted young man, a woman married to a gay fashion designer....

Then suddenly the film becomes this race-riot tale?!

A totally uneven plot.



I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus.
Didn't he discover America?
Penfold, shush.

reply