I appreciate that TV "showrunners" are confronted with the prospect of making drastic changes to sitcoms if there's reason to believe that the original premise has reached a point of diminishing returns, i.e. sagging ratings.
It's easy to say this in hindsight, but it's hard to believe that Fusco thought ALF fans would adjust to a complete break with the Tanners, and ALF becoming a captive of the military.
I never heard the "Bilko" comparison before. And I may be skeptical that turning ALF into a "draftee" of sorts would have succeeded because of the overly-dark and grim "season finale" that became a series finale.
Based on that spooky transition, the new situation seems more like "ALF meets 'The X-Files'" than ALF being a Bilko-type "bad boy".
I know successful sitcoms can be set in grim surroundings, e.g. M*A*S*H and even "Hogan's Heroes".
And "Futurama" fans may remember a hilarious episode that involved the Planet Express crew going back in time to Area 51 in Roswell-- where the alien crustacean, Dr. Zoidberg, is indeed captured by the US military.
That worked as a one-time episode, but I can't see it working as an ongoing premise. Apparently the network agreed.
reply
share