MovieChat Forums > Out of Africa (1985) Discussion > Truly..the worst film ever

Truly..the worst film ever


"The Worst Film Ever." This is quite a common refrain on IMDB. It took me 20 years to come around to expressing my views about this film. "The Worst Film Ever." I saw this in the discussion board about the movie "Sideways." I am so very sorry, but "Sideways" doesn't even hold a candle to this god awful movie, if that's what you want to call this absolute waste of celluloid.This movie was just down right boring. I paid more attention to the happenings going on in the theatre then on the screen. My brother was so bored with this picture he fell asleep in the theatre. I tried to wake him a few times, but he just fell right back to sleep. His snoring became so loud that some of the other theatre patrons complained. They called the theatre usher to tell my brother to either wake up or just leave the theatre altogether. When it came out on VHS in 1986, my mother rented a copy from the neighborhood video store. I warned her about this movie. I told her that she would be disappointed. She loved Robert Redford and wouldn't listen to word I had to say about this film. Sure enough..she became so disappointed with this movie - she pulled the plug on this movie before it was even half way over. The movie was just that bad.

reply

[deleted]

Travel the world and comeback and watch the movie...it may just change your mind.

reply

Sorry, but no amount of travel around the world and even out of the world will change the fact that this movie is an absolute snorefest. I couldn't have been more bored watching grass grow. Just so you know I gave this movie a legit shot. I came back to it a couple of years ago. I was only 15 in 1985, so maybe it was just a little deep for me at that age. NOPE!! I even drank a 5 hour energy so I'd be alert to every detail, 45 minutes in I was nodding off like crazy! This movie however does have a medicinal use. It will cure insomnia in no time flat! I'm a professional musician, I have traveled the entire planet and have been to over 120 countries including many in Africa and this movie is still as boring to me at 40 as it was when I was 15. I must say it was typical of the Academy to hand awards hand over fist to unstimulative slumber inducers as this back then.

reply

I respect your opinion but If I do watch this movie when I dying.I would die happily.This was exact feeling i felt right after i seen this movie first time(When i was 17).Maybe This movie gives people such serenity / calmless (Fast living musian wouldnt get in a million year) which make it such work of true art.

reply

PROFESSIONAL FILM CRITICS ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE FILM EITHER: It currently holds a 53% rating on Rotten tomatoes.com with the consensus: "Though lensed with stunning cinematography and featuring a pair of winning performances from Meryl Streep and Robert Redford, Out of Africa suffers from excessive length and glacial pacing."

Out of Africa is one of only a handful of films -- the others are The Greatest Show on Earth, Cimarron, The Broadway Melody, and Cavalcade -- that won the Academy Award for Best Picture but currently have "rotten" (below 60%) scores on Rotten Tomatoes

Farming is boring.
So is this movie. "Runaway Train" or "Witness" or "Kiss of the Spider-Woman" or "The Color Purple" were also nominated for Best Picture Awards and would have made better choices. Many professional critics agree (giving these other films 80-90% positive reviews).

reply

You drink 5 hour energy. Your brain is a wasteland now. No wonder this film flew over your head.

reply

Not to sound elitist and over-educated (for THIS particular era and country)...but yeah, I guess I am...so, here's a gift for anyone who can't sit through one of the most beautiful films, based on a real author who actually WENT to Kenya and worked a coffee farm, suffered heartache and trekked hundreds of miles through hostile territory (dodging robbers, Germans, lions and Maasai who might or might not kill her), just to bring supplies to her cheating husband and the band of English colonists who didn't care if she lived or died....and then some....and took a lover when most women would have said "Oh no, My repuTATion!"

For someone who cannot appreciate ANY of that due to lightning-paced, crappy editing, no story line films from recycled superheroes (HOW Many Batmen and Spidermen do you think are enough?)...for you: I send this little P.O.S. to whet your whistle for another piece of movie dreck that (I promise!) won't occupy more than 2 seconds of your ...(what's it called?)...OH...that thing that has the words "attention" and "span" in it...

Here ya go: (commercial free--sorry!):

http://youtu.be/BU5sgZrYh4c

Don't worry, I don't blame YOU. I blame the culture AND your parents or whoever let you get like this.

Nothing is what it seems. Everything is a test. Rule #1: Don't...get...caught.

reply

"Not to sound elitist and over-educated".

Don't worry, you don't sound over-educated. In fact, you sound quiet ignorant. Anyone who believes they are smarter than others, or more educated, just because they enjoy different films can't be anything other than a pseudo-intellectual.

reply

Make that "quite ignorant".

reply

You are absolutely spot on!!!!

reply

You haven't seen many films then, but then, how 'good' or 'bad' a film is depends on the perspective and opinion of the individual veiwer. This is a board for expressing information about movies. If you aren't going to give why you think it is 'bad' then why bother posting here?

reply

I have seen alot of movies, and this still remains one of the absolute best movies I have ever seen. It is in my Top 10, and I seriously doubt it will ever leave it.

"Play it Sam. Play 'As Time Goes By'"
"Meet me in Montauk."


reply

Leave the poor guy alone.... He doesn't know ANYTHING about cinematography or acting, the guy's just simply blind or was drunk or whatever when he saw the movie....

Or maybe he likes only action and violence movies, like "The Punisher" (That, you could say, would be one of the worst movies ever made) with horrible acting, and NO CINEMATOGRAPHY AT ALL...



But like i said leave the guy alone. Let him drown in his own ignorance

reply

the guy's just simply blind or was drunk

A blind man would find most movies boring. I don't think being drunk makes you more inclined to fall asleep, though. :P

Or maybe he likes only action and violence movies

Well, I found the five-hour Pride & Prejudice quite engaging and enjoyable, but this film bored me. It's a shame others have fallen asleep or given up halfway through, though, because the second half is considerably more worthwhile than the first, despite the unaltered pace. The flight sequence is marvelous, and there are a few long-term payoffs.

with horrible acting

Now why should he care about that? Ought he to dislike LotR because of its quality acting and cinematography?

and NO CINEMATOGRAPHY AT ALL...

Cinematography: The art or technique of movie photography, including both the shooting and development of the film.

You probably mean mainly the landscape shots. Yes, and the lighting in this movie is pretty good as well. It's impossible to have "no cinematography," though, and camera placement/movement plays an important part in action flicks.

Let him drown in his own ignorance

Aside from the airplane scene, my favorite bits were the little red frog on the leaf and the 3 shots with that cute little owl.

The cockroach is a noble beast....

reply

Whatever! I've seen amateur porn much better and more deserving of an Oscar than this attempt at cinematic entertainment.

reply

No, simpleton, you have not.

"Don't drink that @$$hole, you'll get malaria!..."

reply

there's the truth...

reply

Thank you for your comments....simplistic...perfection...reality...I don't see how anyone could think that this is a bad movie or any of the acting was bad. Streep was amazing to me...she is truly a beautiful woman! This movie made me want to go to Africa with all my heart. You do have to have a romantic spirit I believe.

Tracy

Thank God for the rain to wash the trash off the sidewalk. Travis Bickle-Taxi Driver 1976

reply

Ha! You must understand that there actually are people on this forum who truly believe "Starship Troopers" is the greatest film ever made! It is likely the case that anyone who suggests that OOA is a bad movie is either about 17 years of age, or just a twit. Take your pick. LOL

It doesn't matter, really. This is an art form, and art is in the eye of the beholder.

reply

While I appreciate your remark that people who think OOA is a bad movie must either be this or that, you still didn't actually say what made the film GOOD. There are people who post that think Michael Bay is a genius too, but that has just as much relevance as your Starship Troopers reference.

OOA doesn't have a good plot because it doesn't tell a story. It is seriously lacking in a variety of ways. Please tell me (besides cinematography, actors, score) what is good in this film?

reply

" OOA doesn't have a good plot because it doesn't tell a story. It is seriously lacking in a variety of ways. Please tell me (besides cinematography, actors, score) what is good in this film? "

First of all when people say what was good apart from the Acting, the Cinematography and Music there isn't a hell of a lot left that needs to be good for a film to work. Also this quote is a complete fallacy - 'it doesn't have a story'. It most certainly does.

It tells the story of a willful woman who seeks change in her life and in seeking it chooses to marry a friend who can make that journey possible. Upon arriving in Africa she finds her dream as a whole other beast - an alien world where she is an outsider - for being Danish among the Brits and for being a woman. She battles with these issues through the pain of her husbands philandering and the British colonialist dissmissiveness of the Africans while trying to manage her coffee farm alone. As she starts to find her path and discover her inner strength and wisdom a man comes into her life who has a whole other view of living and Africa. The romance that ensues is the meeting between two strong individuals who seek freedom in an Africa slowly becoming engulfed in colonialism.

That is one way of telling the story. You could just say it is about the struggles of a woman to overcome the challenges of being a woman in wartime Africa. Or that it tells the story of the love between modern minds in an archaic world. Or. Or. These are all valid stories. Yet the fact is that it doesn't really matter if the film has a plot or not, because this is not a plot driven film. It is a film driven by character, experiences, converging lives, historical changes. It is a classic Romantic Epic. Gone With the Wind has similar complexity of story as does Dr. Zhivago. They deal with love amidst great historical developments and the plots rarely go beyond characters reacting to their environments. Yet these are some of the greatest stories. It follows, very well, in the footsteps of great literature such as Kipling's Indian novels or Hemingway's Farewell To Arms or any of the sweeping Russian stories of love and war, to name but a few. The human struggle to survive amid adversity is as classic as it gets and what is at the heart of most great stories.

In addition to this the script is impeccable. The scene between Denys and Karen by the fireplace is as poignant as lovers arguments get.

Karen: I have learned a thing that you haven't. There are some things worth having...but they come at a price, and I want to be one of them. I won't allow it. [Denys bringing a woman with him even if she is of no romantic consequence]
Denys: You have no idea the effect that language has on me.

OR

Karen Blixen: When you go away... you don't always go on safari, do you? Just want to be away.
Denys: It's not meant to hurt you.
Karen Blixen: It does.
Denys: I'm with you because I choose to be with you. I don't want to live someone else's idea of how to live. Don't ask me to do that. I don't want to find out one day that I'm at the end of someone else's life.

Great, simple dialogue that rings very true - not to mention some of the great quotes - Whatever you say now I will believe - when they first kiss. Or Bror telling Denys: 'You could have asked, you know?' and Denys replying: 'I did. She said yes.' Brilliant lines, great writing and then gloriously delivered.

It's a critically acclaimed, publicly adored film and I think I roughly covered story and script on top of the acting, cinematography and score which already were conceded as really good in this film. So surely saying this film is no good and boring and lacks a story reveals no fault of the film makers but the fault of the viewer who is unable to engage with this type of story. Which is fine. Doesn't make the film bad though - just recognise that it is a great film in its genre and say 'not my thing' instead of having to justify your opinion by categorising it - objectively - as awful.

I dislike Requiem For A Dream - but I know it is brilliant. There. I did it. Your turn.

reply

Damn good post.

"I told you it was off." The Jackal

reply

I totally agree. Brilliant, brilliant post.

reply

Ha! You must understand that there actually are people on this forum who truly believe "Starship Troopers" is the greatest film ever made! It is likely the case that anyone who suggests that OOA of a bad move is either about 17 years of age, or just a twit. Take your pick. LOL

reply

Raian-kun Said :"I have seen alot of movies, and this still remains one of the absolute best movies I have ever seen. It is in my Top 10, and I seriously doubt it will ever leave it." I absolutely agree, the sound track alone is superb, the story genuine, and most certainly the cinematography and acting. A magnificent film destined to be classic. The constant shooting, explosions, car crashes of today really get old.

reply

It is an elegant epic, for those that like some 'refined' taste in their viewing pleasure. I watch and like all sorts of films; but in terms of quality, excellent acting and layered story telling, when I am in the mood for it, OUT OF AFRICA is one of the best.

reply

I have to agree with you!!!! I also fell asleep in the theater!! I love movies and can usually find something good to say about every movie.. but the only thing good that I can say about this one is that the cinematography is beautiful - but not enough to give the film the best pic of the year Oscar. I would recommend this movie to anyone who suffers from insomnia - it is sure to to but them to sleep and it surely isn't "habit-forming"!!

reply

i haven't seen this yet so i cannot comment

Other Best Picture nominees

Kiss of the Spider Woman (yet to see)
The Color Purple 3.5/5
Prizzi's Honor (yet to see)
Witness 5/5

i too haven't seen a great deal of films either (up to 250!)

reply

[deleted]

gnolti, good point to make about John Huston and was he in poor health and was not up to making great films anymore. see the example of Annie. i think his last great film as a director is The Man who would be king (1975), then he dissolved into a mediorce director in the 80s like what has been said about being old and ill.

Brazil should have taken the nomination instead.

reply

There has not been a flim made, yet, that can beat out "Plan Nine From Outer Space," as the worst film ever. "Billy Jack" came close but "Plan Nine" remains the champion.

"Out of Africa," however is a classy film, actually very good. I'm sorry there's no flying monkeys or high speed chases in this film. That probably would have kept your 5-second attention span focused.

reply

I hate movies with flying monkeys or high speed chases.... how rude of you to make assumptions on someone you don't even know. And your 5 second attention span comment is more proof of your rudeness. You don't know me or my taste in movies.... don't be so quick to judge someone lest you be judged... and you have been judged... as rude and ignorant.

reply

To you and the guy who started this thing: FORGET THESE SNOBS!!!!! They are protecting this film just because Sydney Pollack (a nice guy but a horrible director) made it, Meryl Streep, Robert Redford, and Klaus Maria Brandauer play in it, and Karen Blixen wrote the novel it is adapted from. They, like Spielberg fans, think that a pretentious boring romantic film is a masterpiece.

reply

Wow! The nerve of someone having a different opinion and view than yours. Why insult people? It's not his fault you like a movie that absolutely suck ballz.

reply

well...since Out of Africa is a sequel to Casablanca...and sequels are never good, i conclude that it is a most disappointing effort. Am i wrong? am i wrong?

reply

[deleted]

There's no way it could be a sequel to Casablanca. Where'd you get that?

"Life is full of censorship. I can't spit in your eye." - Katharine Hepburn

reply

[deleted]

Either crazy or just not-having-seen these films;oD.

"Life is full of censorship. I can't spit in your eye." - Katharine Hepburn

reply

[deleted]

You need to see it! I'd like to read the book, but it was not translated into Czech and I'm to lazy to read it in English;oD.

"Life is full of censorship. I can't spit in your eye." - Katharine Hepburn

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

get a life. You're just a bitter person without any knowledge of film making.

ivan

reply

Are you sure it was meant for me? Be careful what you reply to.

"Life is full of censorship. I can't spit in your eye." - Katharine Hepburn

reply

"well...since Out of Africa is a sequel to Casablanca...and sequels are never good, i conclude that it is a most disappointing effort. Am i wrong? am i wrong?"

I know don't if you are pulling our legs or not - but this isn't a sequel to "Casablanca!" LOL! Not the same characters, different part of Africa, and the events in "Out of Africa" take place 32 years before the events in "Casablanca." How can it be a sequel?

reply

Casablanca is 100% fiction and Out of Africa is based on an autobiography; there is no connection between them at all except they are great films. The people writing that this is the worst movie or a bad movie do not understand art, creativity and probably don't understand art. Go to Roger Ebert's web site and read his reviews of Out of Africa, The Colour Purple, Prizzi's Honour and try to learn why these are great films. If you don't appreciate them, then you are probably not appreciating being alive either.

reply

Well I have to agree with the poster..ive seen many many movies and i understand the concept of ciniemtopgraphy which i will admit was beautiful the cineimatographer desereved the acdemy award...however this movie was not entertaining..it did not promtote some meassage..overall i agree..it was boring..and not the good kind of boring you find in a documentary..just dull

reply

For me it was a brilliant movie. The people that think it was boring they will love it when they actually grow up...

reply

I, too, enjoyed this movie, have since bought the DVD, and I don't buy too many.

I always cringe when I hear people critisize an actor's accent. I am English myself, but I don't really care whether or not Redford had an English accent. Yes, I adore him, but I adore other actors too, and I don't care to hear them using accents other than their own unless flawless. What I am trying to say is, unless the accent is flawless (which in my humble opinion Streep's was) stick to your own. I can enjoy a movie for itself and enjoy the characters much more if they use an accent they are more comfortable with. Prime example...I didn't mind at all that they picked Kevin Costner for Robin Hood, and it didn't detract from the movie (however bad you thought it) that he didn't use an English accent..after all if he had there wouldn't be that great line from Mel Brook's Men IN Tights.....but I did find Costner totally unwatchable in that 55 Days (or something like that) when he attempted a Boston accent. (I think). I think the movie was a good movie - by reports - but I couldn't watch it because of the accent - not because it was Costner ( always kind of liked the guy).

reply

It is not an issue of "growing up". I enjoy many so called adult movies this movie is just overrate and trite

reply

I never saw "Out of Africa", but anything that beat "The Color Purple" is NOT okay in my book.



"Tell me you don't love me?"
"I don't love you."
"...liar."

reply

it's difficult, isn't it?, to accept anything other than what we, as individuals, think should win. But as individuals, we all watch the same movies and see something different. That is why we will all be there with our faces glued to the screen sunday night hoping for 'our' movies, actors, to be the chosen ones. But enjoying the pleasure and pride when someone else wins and thinking maybe they weren't all that bad, adn maybe did deserve to win after all.

reply

That may be so, but in my opinion The Color Purple is the greatest film of all time.



"Tell me you don't love me."
"I don't love you."
"...liar."

reply

[deleted]

Um, who is an idiot?



"Tell me you don't love me."
"I don't love you."
"...liar."

reply

Surely he doesn't mean us!

Ha ha!

reply

lol.. who knows?? People on IMDB can be SO ridiculous! They don't even know what or who they are talking to. They just insert an insult into a post and wait to see who responds to it.




"Tell me you don't love me."
"I don't love you."
"...liar."

reply

[deleted]

I refuse to believe anyone would have seen this movie in the theater,let alone dvd or vhs and not know this was not for them. Idiots.

reply

[deleted]

Where are you people coming from?

Everyone has a right to express his/her opinion (last time I checked, we still have freedom of speech in the U.S.).

But such emotional reactions to everything here! Get a grip. Chill. Obviously this wonderful movie arouses strong reactions.

If you don't like the film, then provide concrete reasons. Think critically.

I never found it boring. I've seen it 8-9 times. After seeing it the first time, I bought Judith Thurmon's book and a few others and learned all I could about Isaak Dineson/Karen Blixen.

The movie served to educate me about her.

Besides, it's beautiful. As far as the dialogue goes, it reflects the way people of that time and class spoke.

reply

The movie was good but not worthy of 7 Oscars. It was filmed quite well but the characters are somewhat plastic in relation to the book, the storyline is at times contrived and muddled and the fact that made the main hero an "American" shows a little too much of the Hollywood creative license to steal. As one who has lived abroad this can get quite mundane you know. Then again of course this isn't the abomination that the one chap said it was...not at all.
Worthy of a night's worth of viewing with some popcorn. But for great cinema I would rather have The Snows Of Kilimenjaro

reply

[deleted]

The movie had good cinematography, decent acting (oonce we forget about Redford) and was well shot and lit. That was pretty much where it ended in my opinion. The overbearing Eurocentrism that ran throughout (granted, the book was a significant part of this problem but there was still little effort made to get around it), the lack of dramatic action (you can get as huffy and puffy about 'the Tarantino generation' as you want, but while I am in that age group I also am a big fan of many older movies and am not a 2 second shot type of guy).

The plot was bland, and the decision to stretch the movie to over 2 and a half hours did not help in my opinion. For some reason, many people see that a movie is long and thus think of it with a certain degree of epic quality, but I justy don't feel that to be true, especially with this somewhat contrived piece. And it's not that I am instantly dismissive of long movies - one of the best films to be released this decade imo, is Best of Youth.

reply

Nope! Your assessment is spot on. I sucked so hard it should've been named Eureka.

reply

Well, this is one of those movies people usually either like alot, or despise with every bone in their body.

Me, I'm on the fence. The story, even for it's day, was uninteresting. Even having traveled through much of Africa and Asia, it just didn't compell me to emotion, or bring back fond memories. The characters have to have something you can associate with, and honestly, they didn't do anything for me.

The cinematography was good for the most part, not like most films that attempt the same feat where 'staying in focus' is considered the high point of their shots. Some beautiful shots, and classic & stylish presentation are the highlights of this one.

Acting... eh, without the compelling story (to me), even the best actor couldn't sell this one for me.

Not really the 'worst film ever', just a film for a very specific audience.

The worst film ever? That would have to include Hulk Hogan, Michael Ironside, and Torgo. If you see those 3 on the bill.. run... run ... and then run some more.

Drax

reply

[deleted]

How old are you, my child? Try to explain why OUT OF AFRICA is the worst film ever... You'll have to live a little more to start loving it...

reply

Wow, I love how people say "He doesn't know anything" because he doesn't like this movie. It's a damned opinion! I just saw the movie for the first time a few minutes ago and I have to agree, to a point that is. While its easily NOT the worst movie ever, I didn't care for it at all. The cinematography is great, for a National Geographic doc. For this movie though, it just doesn't fit. It is almost as if they were trying to "show off" Africa or something. There was no chemistry at all between REdford or Streep and frankly, I didn't give a damn about the characters or what happened which, for a character-driven movie is not a good thing. Now, I don't "like violent movies like The Punisher" or only like crap. Sure, I enjoyed "The Punisher" but it is nowhere near a classic film like "The Godfather" or anything. I would rather a character driven piece than an all out action movie any day of the week but this movie, it's just beyond boring. I'm sure that everyone has their own reason as to why they like it or dislike it, but my reason is that I just didn't care about anything in the movie and for that reason alone, it failed in my eyes. If I had cared about the characters or the situation, the movie probably would have greatly interested me but since I didn't care one iota, it was just awful for me.



reply

"There was no chemistry at all between REdford or Streep..."

To each his own. "Don't move."

"They love me....the men love me, the women love me...... ME, MAHOGANY!"

reply

That scene was just awkward though. It wasn't "sexy" or "hot" or whatever it was meant to be. It was just awkward.



reply

Here's a tip when you say that you don't particularly care for something. Site an example that gets it right in your opinion. That way we'll know where you're coming from and it will definitely lend credence to your opinion. I might not agree with your example but at least there's room to move.

"I thought her a mere social climber, but now I see she's a mountineer." Mrs. Sedley

reply

I said above why I didn't care for the movie. It was boring. There was no basis for me to care about the characters and what happened to them. In a movie that is character driven, it's not a good thing if you don't care about the characters. Also, I realize this is based on a memoir and that everything was true to what happened and they couldn't add some things for the sake of a film but there was really no point in making this movie. Nothing was really accomplished in telling her story. Sure it may have made for a good read (haven't read any of the stuff myself) but it didn't translate well to the screen. There was no turning point or anything that really happened to change things. I didn't care when Denys died when I should have. It meant nothing since his character seemed to be just another person she liked. I never felt a connection between the two characters. There were some things that weren't bad with the movie though. The score was good by itself, but it didn't fit the movie. The score was big and epic, the movie was not. The film was a slow progression about a person's time in Africa. The music was loud and sounded good but didn't particularly go with what we were seeing on screen. Plus, the cinematography looked like it belonged in a National Geographic Documentary on Africa. Every other shot was a wide shot of the landscape edited in to a closer shot of the action that was going on. Sure it looked nice but it didn't help the movie. Maybe this is a film where you need to know where the author was coming from or trying to say in the books to appreciate it but in its current form, it's a borefest. I would however really like to know what people who enjoy the movie, like about it.



reply

So The Fear what movies do you like?

"I thought her a mere social climber, but now I see she's a mountineer." Mrs. Sedley

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I don't even need to see this movie to know that Ran shouldve won this oscar(but it is a foreign film)

reply

How clairvoyant of you. lol Ran wasn't even nominated for best foreign film because Japan didn't submit it as their official entry. Apparently Kurosawa didn't attend the Tokoyo Film Festival premeire and the government retaliated by submitting another film to the acamdemy. Oh well. No matter how good it is (and it is great) there's no way a foreign language film will ever win best picture. The academy isn't that progressive. Not by a long shot.

How much did you put out to get in?
http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=5642503

reply

Thx for the clue, man that sux. Some foreign films are juss soooo good though

reply

"...there's no way a foreign language film will ever win best picture."

Unless it's directed by Clint Eastwood. lol

How much did you put out to get in?
http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=5642503

reply

If this is some people's idea of "truly the worst film ever," I'd hate to know what their idea of "the best film ever" is.

"I don't use a pen: I write with a goose quill dipped in venom!"---W. Lydecker

reply

i don't agree with those who say itz the worst film ever. Come on. Yes, itz a bit boring, but there is a hell lot of movies which can get the tag-BORING. I think the cinematography was superb. Those who din't like it, may be they don't like romantic movies at all. And there had been a few dialogues and conversations in this film which are superb. I dont rate this film too highly, but I m denying to call it a bad film, let alone worst.

reply

I don't know about "worst" ever from a filmmaking standpoint, but definitely the single most boring film I have ever sat through.

reply

"I don't know about "worst" ever from a filmmaking standpoint, but definitely the single most boring film I have ever sat through."

What made you think of Out of Africa?

How much did you put out to get in?
http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=5642503

reply