MovieChat Forums > Mischief (1985) Discussion > If ever there was a perfect bush....

If ever there was a perfect bush....

posted 11 years ago by ronaldt49
18 replies | jump to latest

That was it. I felt I was in the presence of greatness during that scene. Not too hairy and not shaved.

If there is a better one, please list the movie and body it belongs to.

[–] djrage54 10 years ago

Hadn't seen it in years and saw It was coming on hbo the other day. Saved it on my dvr. Now I'm really looking forward to watching it now... In hd

[–] thecalhouns 10 years ago

I really hate that women shave it all off these days

sometimes it looks ok, but it's way overdone and contrary to popular belief not having pubic hair is way more unsanitary than having it (it's there for a reason folks!)

come visit my review blog!

http://griffsrandomreviews.wordpress.com/

[–] maturity 8 years ago

How is it more unsanitary? The hair could hold urine, blood, semen, feces, bacteria, sweat, crabs. I read an article a while back that said crabs and other venereal diseases were less common now, because of women especially being more likely to shave bare or at least have their pubic hair trimmed short and neat. That is one reason the military shaves heads. (It also would prevent enemies grabbing your hair in combat.)

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

I think women have been duped into shaving down there because the world is run by freakin' pedophiles.

[–] tomatosauce6808 10 years ago

It was probably fake. I can't remember the term for it but they make a fake muff to hit a womans privates during sex scenes.

[–] thecalhouns 10 years ago

It was probably fake. I can't remember the term for it but they make a fake muff to hit a womans privates during sex scenes.

in 1985 dude, there was no need for a fake bush

and it's clearly real if you really look at it (and I have!)

[–] pitchrollyaw 10 years ago

It's totally fake. How do I know? Because you can't see any skin through it. No one's natural pubic hair is that thick. No one's.

[–] thecalhouns 9 years ago

Wow, you really think so? You haven't seen much bush, buddy.

[–] MrBullo 8 years ago

The term for a fake is "merkin" but the one in this movie looks real to me. If you want to see plenty of merkins try watching "The Bank Job".

[–] cookieman108 8 years ago

It's totally fake. How do I know? Because you can't see any skin through it. No one's natural pubic hair is that thick. No one's.

How closely and how many times did you view the film, Inspector Gadget?

[–] maturity 8 years ago

Look at playboy from the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s. Even penthouse had lots of oubic hair until the well trimmed phase began in the 90s and shaving or waxing it bare became the style soon after in the 00s. It's like saying all women have external labia. Some don't.

[–] MrBullo 8 years ago

BTW, Playboy first started showing pubes in the 1970'sand 1980s. In the 1950s and 1960s the women only showed their boobs with their legs or other objects strategically placed to hide the pubes.

[–] R_Kane (15828) 6 years ago

[deleted]

[–] bigpapapumpct 8 years ago

She had a great bush. God, I miss the bush. Shaved sucks!

[–] maturity 8 years ago

It makes women look like a child and appeals to male pedophiles. No pubes = prepubescent. Leave a little.

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] prplayer 8 years ago

maybe Kate Winslet in Jude

so many movies, so little time

[–] thecalhouns 7 years ago

I still don't get the trend of shaving it all off.

A bald beaver is not a very attractive thing, a cute little tuft of fur is way sexier.

Thankfully though I think the trend has mostly gone away or is not as ubiquitous as it once was.