MovieChat Forums > Jagged Edge (1985) Discussion > Two Questions? Please help

Two Questions? Please help


This was a decent movie but it was certainly very flawed. I must admit I became engrossed in it though. After I watched it, I have a couple of petty questions. Alert: SPOILERS AHEAD

a) Where did Glenn Close come up with that gun in the end? (A minor detail).

b) I'm confused about the knife in the locker part. Did that other man at the trial have a hunting knife in his locker? The man who had locker 222? I wasn't clear if that knife belonged to that man or not. At the end Bridges character had the knife again so it was just a coincidence that the other man had a hunting knife in his locker? I'm confused by that.





reply

Sure -

1) Where did she get a gun? Well, why not assume she owned one? It's truly not surprising that prosecutors of violent crimes decide to buy and keep a gun.

2) The whole hunting knife thing was a complete red herring - Agatha Christie has many of them in her murder mysteries too.

At the end of the previous year (as always at the end of the year), the janitor at Forrester's country club had to clean out the lockers. During his removal of articles from the lockers, he discovered a hunting knife. He left it at the desk or lost and found. The kind of hunting knife (the length of the blade, the number of inches it's serrated, etc.) matches what the forensics people say is the particular kind of weapon that killed Mrs. Forrester. And when the Assistant D.A. asks the janitor from which locker he had removed it, he says from locker #122, in fact Forrester's locker! The D.A. immediately orders Forrester's arrest.

But Close notes when reading the hundreds of pages of evidence the D.A. admits having, that they report only that they have a witness who saw this knife last year and will testify he took it from Forrester's locker: i) the D.A. doesn't have the knife itself (just a witness who saw it) so it can't be tested in any way for blood, fingerprints, etc, and ii) it happened last year.

She orders the investigator played by Robert Loggia to interview all current members about the knife - maybe they can contradict the janitor's testimony from his memory. Loggia does -but reports to her no one knew anything about a knife. She says "Well, interview all who WERE members at the end of last year, but are no longer members".

He's irritated, but says sure. During the trial, Loggia finds a former club member who apparently said to Loggia (we don't hear this conversation but it's implicit) "yeah, sure I know about that knife - it was mine. Want to see it?" He produces the knife to Loggia (who later brings it to court).

This former member says on the stand, "The janitor cleaned out my locker at the end of last year, and put my hunting knife with lost and found, where I picked it up. My locker was #222. I took it home and sure, I've been using my hunting knife since." Thus, the hunting knife is a bit more used and scratched now.

On being re-called as a witness, the janitor examines the knife and says

"Yeah, if this particular knife were new, it would match the one I saw and removed from the locker. And yes, it's possible that in the time since I cleaned out the lockers last year, I've confused #222 with #122. Gee, I could have sworn ... but maybe I was wrong. "

The knife Bridges had used - was never found by the police.

reply

Thanks for the help. I still don't understand why anyone would keep a hunting knife in their locker at the country club.

reply

My guess: he'd just bought it and forgotten he had it there until it was cleaned out of his locker. That happens very much with stuff of mine in lockers in the past - sometimes stuff sits for ages.

reply

Though this isn't really an answer, more of an agreement with you on certain aspects. I loved this movie back in the 80's, I thought it was a classic on the edge of your seat thriller. However being swept up in the memory of it I decided to watch it again.
I sat open jawed and not in a good way, lol. The start of the movie the music was hammy, the kill scene cliched, though in fairness it only looks cliche now. what I found worse in fact was the writing, some of the dialogue was awful.
Jeff Bridges was certainly a handsome guy back in the day, but his acting skills, oooh, bit of a shocker. The only saving grace in the movie, thankfully was Glenn, but I have to admit I've always had a soft spot for her. She is an accomplished actress who is a great acing talent. The one thing that this movie made me feel is how we as audiences get swept up in the whole movie viewing experience, also how thankful I am that writing and acting styles change, the definition of realism is constantly changing, thankfully.

reply