Underrated


people tend to dislike this sequel, but i'm not one of them. I admit its nowhere near the masterpiece the original was, but its still a fun film to watch, and Reaper is one of the best mutants i've seen in a while. Overall, i think this film deserves a little bit more consideration than it originally got.


"Reaper no get fooled like Papa Jupe!"

reply

[deleted]

I agree. It's better than a lot of other Craven flicks that he has disowned. The slasher formula is at least done right and the quirk of having a dog flashback and blind heroine just elevates it to another level.

I didn't like it at first, but nowadays I give it at least a 6/10.



I review horror films at: http://www.oh-the-horror.com/
1000 with pics!

reply

It is OK. Not as good as the first but not nearly as bad as people say. It just feels like a typical '80s slasher movie to me which isn't a bad thing. It is still a very good sequel, just different than the previous film.

I've been waiting for you, Ben.

reply