They said part 2 is a disaster... why it's so bad?
Does anyone knows?
share[deleted]
[deleted]
What do you mean changed the location?
ps.More kids in horror movies should ride dirtbikes and know judo.
"Erections don't rape people sir, people rape people" -Brainscan
[deleted]
There is nothing to like about this film. The only reason you're saying that you liked it was to look cool. The first one was good and this movie was awful. I don't know why Wes Craven does these types of things. Money I guess.
shareI will admit that the Part 2 has a different feel to it. But I *beep* love it!
The first movie isn't' a "slasher" movie at all. It's very gritty and raw and as a result very scary and unnerving. At times it's so dark you can't tell what's going on which, nowadays would be considered poor filmaking but I found very scary.
The second movie is somewhat less gritty, there's some comedy relief and would probably fall into the "slasher" genre. It doesn't have the hyper-violent feel to it that the first one had. If you like Friday the 13th movies you'll love Part 2 (especially the music). To make your movie scary you have to create sympathy for the characters. An easy way to do so is to establish comedy because everyone likes people that are funny. Also, it's refreshing to see that the kids in this movie are very vigilant. Two of them seem to know judo! It doesn't help out much though because the killers rarely kill anyone face to face (they use boobytraps for the most part).
"SE-DA-GIIIIVE!?!?!" -Young Frankenstein
Finally, someone else out there with an affinity for In the Mouth of Madness :)
shareI believe that budget cuts and a rushed schedule and the general forcedness of the film are what make it so bad. But its been awhile since i read about it.
That's exactly what happen. Kim Newman spoke about it. First HHE was huge hit in Britain, so Brits more or less demanded a sequel. They co-produced it with money earned from original... and of course, when you force directors to make something in a short time, it always end up being a disaster. They wanted a franchise, but it backfired because part 2 was disaster and made very little money.
This kinda reminded me of Insidious 2. You can literally feel that James Wan didn't want to make that movie, but had to because he was under contract. It's just felt so rushed and lifeless. share