At the end, they make sure to show the bunny and basket in Xavier's apartment. The next time we see it, Karen (Mo's) carrying it into the cab for the airport. Did I miss something or did editing screw up? It's not earth-shattering, but bothersome nonetheless.
shareu know how these movies are...............if u watch them u can always find the flaws in them..............every time i watch a movie i always tend to notice little screw ups..........i have always wondered whether or not the production crew picked up on this before or after their release
shareI just received my dvd in the mail and sat thru it, remembering every moment of the first two times I saw this movie in the 80s. Additionally, I taped it from HBO and had it on video! The bunny is actually shown in Chantal's apartment, not Xavier's...Mo leaves Chantal's place and goes to knock on Xavier's, running smack into his wife!
I played back the dvd to double check!!
Sighh...those BLUE BLUE eyes!!
She's carrying the rabbit as she's going through the airport on the way home.
shareThe rabbit is one of the things that ruins the movie for me. In the first place, it brought to mind the "boiling the bunny" scene from Fatal Attraction. In the second place, I wondered why not just land back at home in St. Louis and buy a bunny there. In the third place, I hate movies, like end of the world movies, where concerns by the star for an animal sinks the plot. And I definitely think it sunk this plot.
shareWow, this asinine remark sat here for 7 years and no one pointed out the obvious:
This movie came out in 1984, three years before Fatal Attraction. How the hell was it supposed to anticipate a scene from a future film?
I don’t think the poster named Speedo was saying the producers of this movie were at fault. Speedo is saying what ruined the film personally for him/her. Speedo’s second point is good. Why buy a bunny in France only to cart poor animal in a bulky cage on a long flight and through airports? It looked like an ordinary bunny, not some rare breed too.
share