Kirstie Alley should have returned as Savvik
wouldve made it feel like a true continuation of II. Kirstie Alley mustve done Runaway instead of ST III - Tom Sellecks Blade Runner - coming a year after his Raiders (High Road to China)
picture Alley in Trek III and the movie gets better already all the stuff on Grissom, then with young Spock, the chemistry with David, his death scene wouldve been even more powerful, telling Kirk his son is dead. the scene of Savvik and Kirk on genesis, and that glance between Spock and Savvik at the end. it wouldve worked so much better.
plus like the Savvik in III shed have had her hair all long/permed like in Runaway the same year
http://cineplex.media.baselineresearch.com/images/261767/261767_large.jpg
plus if Alley had done III she wouldve had a cameo in IV and the Valrius role in VI (as it was originally intended to be savvik - Meyer wanted Alley back but she declined, and Robin Curtis wasnt considered. So it went to Kim Cattrell who had been the original choice for savvik in Trek II) it wouldve made alot of sense since Savvik wouldve watched Klingons kill the man she loved - Kirks son
imagine sitting there in the cinema xmas 91 watching Kirk and Spock interacting with Savvik knowing Meyer is calling the shots like its 82 all over again! itd have been like Wrath of Khan part 2