Ogre is DISGUSTING


When the Alpha-Betas crash the Tri-Lamb initiation party, they moon them from the street. All of them but Ogre pull down their pants only far enough to show their butts. Ogre on the other hand pulls his pants way down to his knees!

You see way too much when Ogre moons the Nerds. I didn't notice this back in the 1980's when I first saw this movie. Maybe it's because I now have the movie in high-def that Ogre's testicles, butt-hole, and penis are extremely vivid and hard to miss?

I think this is one of those situations where an older movie should remain in a lower resolution. I doubt you could see his junk on a standard 1980's era TV set.

I dare you to watch the mooning scene in high-def. It is truly traumatizing.

reply

reply

I think Donald Gibb was quite a bit less inhibited than Ted Mc Ginley and the other AB actors. Had there been High Def back then the scene would have been re-shot or deleted. High Def has been a bucket of cold water on a lot of memories anymore.

reply

I buy alot of 80s movies on Hi Def just so I can see clearer nudity.
Fraternity Vacation and Barbara Crampton! Rowr!

reply

I buy alot of 80s movies on Hi Def just so I can see clearer nudity.
Fraternity Vacation and Barbara Crampton! Rowr!
And don't forget H.O.T.S. and Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning.
_______________

My iMDB profile http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4297325/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

reply

watch rotn 2-4 he gets better



Smash the control machine, work, buy, consume, die. Haters, betrayers, liars and thieves.-Otep

reply

To the OP: If you're "traumatized" by the sight of testicles, a penis and a butthole, I have a couple hypothesis. 1) You're too young to be watching this movie anyway. 2) You're an idiotic, political correctness nazi who thinks anything that offends you simply MUST offend everyone and therefore must be eradicated.

No, I say, drop your pants. Shake your weinie, and swing your nutsack to and fro, Ogre. You were in a movie that came out in 1984, when the rules of offensiveness were different. People that went to see a movie like this fully expected to see nudity from both sides of the gender aisle. We don't get offended by this type of thing when we're old school and grew up watching movies of this era.

reply

If you want to address the "OP" then reply to one of their messages, just a FYI.

Male genitalia on a rather obese man waving around to-and-fro is rather disgusting. It doesn't matter if it's the 1980's or the 2100's. It's revolting in any decade.

reply

Well then... Don't, by any means, watch Jocks. There is a frat drinking game which executes a rather exhibition Gibb moment


Peanutlee33

reply

Wow, are you really that much of a prude in real life? Grow *beep* spine.

reply

You consider Ogre to be "rather obese"??? Wow, you're even more delusional than you sounded in your first post.

reply

Gooooonnnnnnggggggg!!!!

"check the imdb cast list before asking who portrayed who in movies please"

reply

Maybe you were a little TOO "traumatized," IF you know what I'm saying!

reply

👏

I'm....I'm...doing something in here.

reply

I like how they wrote their names on their butts. I just noticed that for first time.

reply

I thought this post was going to be about Ogre’s disgustingness as a whole. He spits beer at people, eats pie like a 1-year-old, etc. I imagine he’s a tank on the football field, but I can’t see a woman wanting to be around him.

reply

[deleted]

You see way too much when Ogre moons the Nerds. I didn't notice this back in the 1980's when I first saw this movie. Maybe it's because I now have the movie in high-def that Ogre's testicles, butt-hole, and penis are extremely vivid and hard to miss?


I was re-watching the movie last night and paid close attention to this scene, based on this post. You absolutely do see everything! I can't believe I'd never noticed it before!

reply

Told ya.

reply

[deleted]

I think it's a guilty pleasure and you just wanted to see how many women will openly say they liked it.

_______________

My iMDB profile http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4297325/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

reply