Confused by ending


I have never been familiar with the novel A Passage To India so I was clueless going into the movie. I am confused the ending and never really understood what happened in the caves. It didn't seem like Dr. Aziz did it. Why was she so upset once she lit the match? Please help!!!!

reply

It's been a while since I last saw the film, sometime last year; and the time when I read the book was before that, I believe, but I hope I can answer some part of your question.

Aziz and Fielding reconcile. However, they also realize that they cannot remain friends, not under the current conditions in India, and after the whole ordeal they've been through. Fielding realizes that he is more of an Englishman than he initially thought, and that he belongs among his own people. He has become more supportive of the British. Aziz also seems to embrace his own Indian identity.

Forster made the events that happen in the Marabar caves vague on purpose, and in the novel these events are perceived from the perspective of Aziz, if I'm not mistaken. In all likelyhood Aziz did nothing wrong, but the point is that this event devides the Indians and the British. The only Englishman willing to help Aziz is Fielding, and he is an atheist, and wishes to look past ethnicity in his judgment of people. The rest of the British seem unified in their support of Adele and condemn Aziz. Racial identity is a very important theme in A Passage to India, and this is the reason why it is hard for Fielding and Aziz to remain friends in the end.

I can't really remember the match scene, so I can't tell you anything about that, but perhaps some other visitor will know.

reply

I interpreted the "match in the cave" scene as a flashback and culmination to Miss Questid's (sp?) earlier encounter in the jungle with the erotic scenes in the ancient sculptures she sees, where the monkeys "attacked" or spooked her after she is momentarily mesmerized by those erotic ancient sculptures. She doesn't "like" them initially because her culture prohibits it, but on a deeper feminine level she is aroused by those images, or at the very least somewhat disturbed by them without knowing exactly why.

The scene in the cave was a culmination of Miss Q's realization of how Aziz might have loved his late wife, and how that compares to her friendly, but sterile, relationship to the man to whom she is engaged to be married. Her conflict over erotic love, devotion, friendship and mature love (which can encompass all 3 and more) came to a head in that cave. She semi-unconsciously fantasized what it would be like to be loved in all of those ways, compared it to the "love" that awaited her in her current relationship/ engagement, and went a little bit mad in the process. There is no question in my mind that Aziz was innocent, and a victim of that era's repressed inner turmoil, her not being able to outright admit that she didn't want to marry the cold fish she was about to marry, seeing, if but a fraction, in Aziz what it might be like for a man to really love a woman, but in some ways a proper Englishwoman dare not imagine (for that era). So Aziz was the "savage" and the scapegoat for her restive and unsatisfied, yet fearful mind. Growing up through my own childhood and early adulthood years as a woman in a restrictive religious environment, this movie spoke volumes to me along these lines. As an adult almost-40 woman, devout but in different ways, I see Aziz as definitely innocent in this movie's portrayal of his character. Miss Q's "trial" of breaking free from an unwanted marriage involved victimizing Aziz, tragically. Fielding's involvement in it all was as a nonreligious man, but rational; he identified with Aziz' victimization but above all, he is still an Englishman. Notice that in the end, Miss Questid's life does not seem to be "happily ever after", but Aziz might come closer to it than hers.

I've seen it so many, many times and this movie is one of my top favorites. So well done on so many levels. Rich, lush, thought-provoking, political, poignant. Wonderful.

"I am not your sugar."

reply

What do you think the ending is suggesting for Adela Quested?

reply

Good question Jungle Red. I've thought a lot about it over the years. At the end of the movie, after she sent her letter to Aziz, she still seems very sheltered, living a carefully controlled life in England with basic creature comforts around her - but the impression I got was that she was not free or even happy. She was not as comfortable with herself, in expressing who it was she felt herself to be, as Aziz was in the end. Aziz went through so much, but in the end he seems to find the inner strength to bounce back from it and embrace his identity and his life. At the end of the movie, Adela Quested seems muted, unfinished somehow - and destined to remain that way indefinitely.

reply

Fielding realizes that he is more of an Englishman than he initially thought


i disagree. take his stand at the club, where he renounces his membership and declares he will leave the college and india is aziz is found guilty.

it is aziz who does not want to be friends. he has become a militant nationalist. he has become what he hates. it is fielding who forces the reconciliation.

and it is fielding who stays in india, continuing to work in education.

but its like gandhi says in the movie gandhi (which he actually said) "this must be a stuggle for indians only". indians must break their own chains of colonialism themselves. moral support is welcome, but actual help is not only not needed, but detrimental to the self sufficiency he was trying to show indians they were capable of

fielding knew that he was loved by the indian people for his support of aziz, but hte celebration was not his to partake in, not while britain still ruled the country.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I agree with your interpretation but would like to point out that Aziz and the culture he comes from, the culture of Muslims in India, is as traditional and conservative (and just about as repressive to both men and women) as the British culture of Miss Q.

Aziz might think of visiting brothels and look at pictures of young ladies but he's hardly less prim than the colonists. He is a devout Muslim and is shocked and embarrassed at Adela's question if he has more than one wife and doesn't easily share that he was a virgin before his marriage and that he had to fall in love with his wife.

So it's not really a case of a sensual exotic man making the virginal and repressed white woman wonder.

reply

This movie also spoke to me too because people don't understand me very well (i was diagnosed as aesperger's relatively late in life) and on a couple occasions, I've gotten in trouble for some romantic intentions by outside parties and felt villified like Azziz.

www.examiner.com/x-3877-dc-film-industry-examiner

reply


Very well explained. Thank you. This movie is a mixture of Gandhi and To Kill a Mockinbird, and a little black and white film with Laurence Olivier, Simone Signoret, Sarah Mles and Terence Stamp that I saw when I was a little boy. Go find it and let me know what you think. I love Judy Davis.

reply



I just mentioned Sarah Miles in another film and it just came to my mind that with Miles in the role I would've understood the story better. Davis seems to have her feet very well grounded. Miles always projected a not-to-well-balanced personality that would have made the role more believable. She had worked with Mr. Lean before, but perhaps by 1984 she was not the right age for the role.

One more thing: Banerjee (I could not find his relationship with, if any, Kanura Banerjee from the Apu Trilogy) reminded me of Oskar Werner as the ship doctor in Ship of Fools. Same facial structure, same eyes, same sad expression, same vulnerability...

And another one: The music theme seemed very familiar to me, and I believe it's a reworking of the music from Ryan's Daughter. Both partitures by Maurice Jarre.

And yes, Alec Guinness seems like a miscasting from another era.

reply

Thank you, for I too saw Oskar Werner (an actor my mother loved) in Victor Banerjee's face - completely. And I thought it was just me.

reply

scratches all over herself? She did it to herself? She was so taken aback by the 'moment' in the cave (of eroticism) that she did it to herself, and couldn't remember it? Is that right?

reply

In her panic to flee, she became entangled in cacti; no doubt adding to her hysteria. She was promptly sedated for at least a couple of days so presumably that and the biased woman's account created more confusion in her mind during which she signed the affidavit.

reply

Thank you, movie-309!

reply

No, according to the movie she ended up in a cactus as she ran away in confusion. I haven't read the book yet.

reply

About Adela'incident,it should have done an important distinction

1) in the book we know(AT THE END BECAUSE SHE MISTERIOUSLY AND STUPIDLY DOESN'T TELL IT DURING THE TRIAL) THAT SOMEONE(PROBABLY THE GUIDE) TRIES TO WITHHOLD HER, but Adela think he's Aziz that is in the cave too

2)In the movie it seems effectively that Adela is crazy,because we see Aziz out of cave....how to be wrong about an attempt of rape? Meanwhile in the book the situation is differt and much more difficult,because something has happen,not a rape,but a TENTATIVE...

SO in movie Adela has suggestive mind,even if since she doesn't since that point

book: another story

reply

Adela can't get the rapid pulse of India out of her head. It makes a "good" English girl like herself have crazy sensual thoughts that she wouldn't have otherwise. It makes her desire skyrocket and she doesn't understand why.

Adela is not "crazy," she merely embodies the British fear of India.

Well...my other God calls - The Honorable Sheriff of Nottingham

reply

She fell down when she ran away from the cave > cactus needles in her arms > she scratches.
that's how I saw it anyway, I don't think anything happened in the cave, whatever happened was in her mind, she goes a bit mad. Earlier in the film someone, I believe it was mrs Moore, says that in India you really get to know yourself and that this is too much for some people. I think it was too much for Adela! She realises things about herself and about the British culture she lives in, she realises that these things might collide.

Thanks for your insights WDformerWB

reply

I've always taken, beginning with the scenes in the jungle, the incident in the Malabar caves as an allegory for the beating heart of India (the echo being the pulse, of course). For Mrs. Moore, the call of India is so strong, it deafens her, at the same time conflicting with her staid English background. For Adela, the pulse is not just the vitality and morbidity of India, but also the implicit sexual attraction between her and Dr. Aziz. She, too, is a product of her class, and left alone with only a match and her own feelings, and the approaching echo of Dr. Aziz, she runs from herself and her own impulses, just as she ran from her discovery of the ruins in the brush. But "She has character!" You'll notice that it's only she and Mrs. Moore and Fielding who are willing to make such an exploration of the caves - to the rest of the English its just one more desolate, barbaric place to avoid.

I suppose, too, the caves are an allegory for the British occupation of India. Having no business colonizing the place, and trying to impose British mores, or at least ignoring the Indians and holding steadfast to their standards, the British were fundamentally incapable of understanding the heart of Indian culture, just as Adela and Mrs. Moore are ultimately limited in how much of India they can accept. They just happen to be more willing to explore than most. We never see the heart of Indian culture either, by the way, only Dr. Aziz sweating out of his shirtsleeves, anxious to please his British guests.

I prefer the Jewel in the Crown to this, but then I thought the development of Adela's character, and that of Mrs. Moore, too brief. And Peggy Ashcroft is in both.

reply

I believe she had gotten a bit "too much sun" as Aziz had pointed out, but, as some other posters have mentioned, I think Adele was at a confusing crossroads in her life--with her iminent marriage and all--which left her vulnerable to delusions of deluge. I think it was noble of Aziz to look past his anger in the end and contact Adele to offer forgiveness.



He who conquers himself is mightier than he who conquers a city.

reply

Adele and Aziz both go against their peers - Adele is encouraged to condemn Aziz by her fellow Englishers and Aziz is encouraged to sue for costs by the crowds of Indian supporters. They become unwilling figureheads for political conflict. As people they liked one another and were willing to undergo considerable hardship in order to 'free' one another even before they were able to forgive and understand the nature of the situation. There is an underlying theme of treating one another as people - an attempt to get past the invented barriers of race, religion and gender. I really can't list them all - but there are many subtle interplays of this difficulty of the human desire to be superior and the human desire to connect.

reply

I like HemingwayHero's reply to this question and would like to take it further. Adela evidently had a panic attack and in retrospect may in her confusion have believed she was raped. Lean seems to make this point visually by the sight of Aziz silhouetted against the sky at the opening to the cave (Freudian symbolism) as viewed from inside, a vision that her tortured mind could easily have made much of following her experience in the Hindu temple. Blowing out a match may also be relevant here, it being a filmic visual convention for satisfying a person's desire. The fact that she extinguished it herself may emphasise that the rape took place only in her own mind.

reply

Well, foremost, there was never the mention of rape actually taking place, but the attempt to rape! So "rape took place in her own mind" is also wrong. Even about the attempt, in an interview, Reflections of David Lean, the director clearly mentions about Adela so:
"this girl is fascinated by it... remember this is the mid 20s... she begins to realize the sexuality within..."

and later

"goes on an expedition with a young Indian... she goes into a cave and she wants him".

I'm not sure how this is in the book, but thats how the movie is meant to be.

reply

[deleted]

well, first - Dr Aziz didn't attack the girl.. we heard talk that the caves were capable of creating confusion and disorientation.. to a hapless, repressed young English lady, the effect of those caves, factoring in the blazing heat outside, made her go off her rocker - temporarily. it sparked the culture clash between Brits and Indians. recall the comment by the Prosecutor "it is well-known that the eastern races have a weakness for European women [something like that]" - the Defender replies "is that so when the man is more beautiful than the woman?" (to gales of laughter in the courtroom).

Second, David Lean is very subtle in the images he presents--did you notice the local women are colorfully-dressed, elegant and very pretty, esp. with the eye makeup? By contrast, the British women are older, or very drab - Adela in particular. Her complexion and dress are.... blah..! The arrogance of the British to overrate the attractiveness of this girl, such that the Doctor, drooling and pagan, would jump her... if you know what I mean. But British arrogance is a recurring theme in Lean's other epics: Lawrence of Arabia and Bridge on the River Kwai.

Finally - Adela is a bit repulsed by her fiance's attitude toward the Indian people, and tells him the engagement is off. Shortly after, she rides out and sees those erotic stone images - they arouse and disturb her and, with no marriage, there is no relief in sight (if you catch my drift - I am trying to be delicate here).. add the HOT EXOTIC climate to the picture, and we have a repressed young lady who is an accident going somewhere to happen.

You can catch this film now on Netflix.


:-) canuckteach (--:

reply

I have only seen the film; I've not read the book. But in the movie, it is my belief that what happened in the cave was that Miss Quested had an orgasm. Sexual tension had been building for quite some time in her own mind, and then to be alone with a man of a more "primitive" culture in a remote place triggered a kind of sexual hysteria (the burning match). In the cave, as in her own mind, she was alone, vulnerable, no way out. The man could have her. All Aziz had to do was enter her space. And he did (although innocently) . . . with his voice. The tension was overwhelming, and she came. This was displayed symbolically in the scene immediately following, where a bit of water washed over a rocky ledge in the pond where the elephant was bathing.

Having achieved this release, she reverted to her proper English self. Deeply shamed and in a panic, she fled down the slope. When found, she then had to invent -- either consciously or unconsciously -- an explanation for her panic and disheveled appearance.


reply

The ridiculously naive and stupid Adela used the entire (and false) incident to demonstrate the alleged "racism" in India, in a misguided attempt to make changes...unfortunately, she ruined a man's life in the process - Adela's idiotic belief was in the righteousness of sacrificing one to the benefit of many. The movie was meant to illustrate how lame the British were when controlling India.

reply

maybe she was touched by a demon

reply