MovieChat Forums > Nineteen Eighty-Four (1985) Discussion > Why do leftists refuse to see that the g...

Why do leftists refuse to see that the gov of Big Brother is leftist?


It is amazing that leftists equate Nazis with the right (they were a left wing SOCIALIST movement), they equate Stalinism with the right (communism being the logical conclusion to all leftist thought) and when they read a book like 1984 they think they are reading about what the future would be like under a right-wing government?

Right wing = SMALL government, no social assistance, few government agencies etc.

I guess if your level of cognitive disonence is such that you are voting for symbolism over substance (the liberal way) then you can make yourself believe anything.

Just look at Yahoo answers to the question: 'Were Nazis left-wing?' The "Best Answer" is essentially: yes they were, yet what follows is 20 clueless idiots saying they were right wing conservatives? Give me a break. Own your legacy you servile sheep.

reply

While there are certain aspects of fascism and socialism that cross, they are not the same. Having "socialist" in their title makes the Nazis no more socialist than calling North Korea democratic because the word is in their official title. While both socialism and fascism reject capitalism, fascism is based upon the state's ultimate power and is inherently nationalist in its outlook and does not even pretend to believe in equal rights. Neither fascism or socialism work but it's a fallacy to say that the Nazis were left wing because the definition of being liberal is to believe in a rapid progression of society. Fascism exists to preserve what it believes is the bedrock of society.

I don't see 1984 as inherently right or left wing. The Party are much more cynical than that as they believe in power, pure power, which carries across all political spectrums.



reply

Left and right are basically arbitrary terms, invented during the French Revolution to deal with a far different situation. The real distinction is between elected government and dictatorship. Oceania is, of course, a dictatorship. As its model, Orwell cited Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, the Chinese Empire, and the Spanish Inquisition -- the latter two are scarcely "leftist".

As for "small government", it has never worked and never will. Small government leaves a power vaccuum that will be filled by power-seeking private individuals who are not accountable to the people they rule. Its prophet, Thomas Jefferson, owned slaves, and I'm pretty sure that he didn't follow small-government principles when he forced them to work for him.

reply

Having "socialist" in their title makes the Nazis no more socialist than calling North Korea democratic because the word is in their official title.


Actually, the Nazis were indeed socialists at their birth. Also, Hitler had some very nice things to say about communism in Mein Kampf. Of course, the Nazis, like the Party in 1984, didn't actually walk the walk once they took over Germany. The Nazis (and the Soviet Union) became, in essence, watered- down versions of the government in Oceania.

No blah, blah, blah!

reply

Hitler equated socialism with the Jew, so he did not have a nice opinion of Socialism. That, and the SA were constantly fighting with the German communist in the street would also tend to invalidate that.

reply

While the socialist aspects of the govt in 1984 are certainly "leftist", looking through the lens of current day American politics, it easy to why many would see the novel's gov't as "right wing" aka Republican-
Thought crime (the concept of sin [particularly sins of omission, lust, etc.] as pushed by the religious right)
Perpetual war (the war on terror and drugs, ridiculous budgets for military spending, military bases all over the world, etc.)
Imaginary or trumped up boogie men as scare tactics to keep the public in line, violate civil liberties and push for pre-emptive, continual war (the patriot act, TSA x-ray machines, labeling any dissenters as unpatriotic and and even serious threats to social order)
Promotion of ignorance (anti-intellectualism advocated by tea baggers and FOX pundits)
Revisionist history (all this BS founding father mythology repeated daily, non-stop over the airways and by their puppets in the streets)
Moral hypocrisy of the ruling class (list is too long - on both side, but GOP senators in that last 10-12 years take the cake)
etc., etc., etc.

And as far as voting for symbolism over substance...lol. Check the voting records - the GOP advocates small govt at election time but shows little example of voting this way.

RS
(non-democrat)

reply

Nice post kingcrimson.

I despise both parties for different but equal reasons as at the end of the day IMO it is all a matter of what kind of lie you want to believe from politicians.

Put VERY simply, republicans will screw you over and hardly hide the fact...democrats will do the same but try hard to convince you they are your friend.

Same end result. All animals are created equal but some are more equal than others.

[insert very clever movie quote here]

reply

---------------------------------------------------------
Put VERY simply, republicans will screw you over and hardly hide the fact...democrats will do the same but try hard to convince you they are your friend.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Another comparison: both parties try to take power away from voters and move it to unelected institutions that they think are on their side. The Republicans try to move it to the "private sector", and the Democrats try to move it to the court system. The difference is that the Republicans and the private sector stick together, while the Democrats don't seem to have noticed that they've lost control of the courts.

reply

Phhuuuleaseeee! All of those things you mention happened not just during the Repubs control of government but Clinton's time as well as Obamas. The Dems at times have control of the Whitehouse and all of Congress and the War on Drugs, or the Middle East, doesn't go away. War under Bush is evil but war under Obama is worthy of a Noble Peace Prize? Please inform us where the right has "lust crimes" enforced in America. It's not the right who pushes speech codes on US campuses or has violent protest and shouting down speakers to prevent free speech they disagree with. Revisionist history? ROFLMAO! Please point that out as you sound as you've never spent much time around liberal arts departments at US universities where the overwhelming majority of them are run by very left professors.

The only thing you do nail is how the GOP talks small government when out of power but act differently when in office. The GOP can be very intolerant and silly on social issues but your post sounds rather demagogic.

Craig
(non-Republican or Democrat) <br>

reply

"Please inform us where the right has 'lust crimes' enforced in America."

In some states up until around the 1990s, practicing homosexuality was against the law.
Also, interracial marriage, as well as co-habitation and coitus, was illegal in many (perhaps most) states for a long period of time; the decline of this law began in the late 1940s before the Supreme Court deemed anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional in 1967.
In general, co-habitation, fornication, and adultery were illegal in most states until the mid 20th century. Adultery is still illegal (though apparently this law is seldom enforced) in 21 states. That's 42% of the states. In Maryland, an adulterer may be fined $10, while in Michigan an adulterer can be sentenced for life.

That being said, I am unsure of the political leanings of the legislators who drew up these laws.

Also, I need to get back to my real work now. I sort of fell down a rabbit hole with the adultery research.

Regards,
Katherine
(Neither Republican nor Democrat as of yet, but I have a slightly liberal stance when it comes to social issues. The economy is not my milieu, so no comment there. I have a jaded view of politics as a whole, and I think that even the most idealistic politician can turn into a corrupt... scoundrel, for lack of a better word).

reply

I think the people involved in this topic who are labeling our parties as republican or democratic are very simple minded in their political theory.


Guess what government leaders terrorized black people during the Civil rights era? Southern DEMOCRATS.

You people act like each party is static and never changing. You act like some meth'd out psycho spouting terrible ideas on his or her political television show speaks for their entire party. You all fall for the illusion of the difference between the two choices we have. What you don't realize is how extremely close the average thought of each average party member is. You listen to these extremists on television and podcasts and believe that this is how MOST normal people feel/agree/disagree in respect to their political belief.

Go Google how many official parties India has. That is true choice. True left, right and center. Possibly true Anarchy?


So I suppose you could call our government an illusion. A type of political "doublethink". It's pathetic that people stand so rigidly with their party that they give up their own values in order to belong to either. When in fact their beliefs are so similar and things will not change profoundly in four years.

reply

Right wing = SMALL government, no social assistance, few government agencies etc.


No, they want small government when it suits them for taxation, but BIG government when it comes to "moral" issues, like dictating who can marry who, who can sleep with who, what people with free will do with their bodies, what you can consume, and so on. In its runaway form, it is fascism.

(not a Democrat...just a moderate independent)

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

The Republican party and Democratic party are not the same now as they were then. You would have to be a fool to use that as a defense for the Republican party. Pick your corruption and stick with it is really all there is to say. You want to know the biggest difference between the two parties? Right wings are power hungry and want to line their pockets and the best way is to sell you the consumer what ever it is they are selling at the time. Left wings are power hungry and want to line their pockets, but are also idealistic and think of tomorrow for all people instead of today oh and also they want you to again buy w/e it is they are selling.

The majority of voters don't really know what they want or need what they know is what planned out marketing techniques tell them the most powerful marketing technique since the dawn of time of course is word of mouth and that's the #1 technique that is employed to buy votes from you and me. Left wings aren't socialists so stop buying that moronic product the right wings have created.

reply

This is a British film of a book by a British author,get a bit bored by everything on IMDB being about current American politics.

Anyway Orwell was a democratic socialist who hated communism,he wrote the book about how he feared Stalinist communism taking power in the west due to the wrong headedness of the communists and their trendy fellow travellers.

Of course the government in 1984 is left wing in image but Orwell knew from peronal experience that poltical extremes have a lot in common,secret policeman and torturers change sides and carry out the same job.

Orwell wrote when asked about 1984 that it was not an attack on socialism itself,or indeed on the then current Labour government in the UK but on the perversion of the socialist ideal by Soviet communism.
These facts are covered in numerous books and academic journals and are best expressed by Orwell himself in his letter to the united automobile workers.
Orwell was also an anti fascist but he knew writing an anti fascist book in 1948 would be too easy,fascism had just been defeated and discredited but some people sought easy anti democratic solutions.

reply

Whether some of the posters agree or not, Eric Blair/George Orwell wrote the book based on the LEFT. Big brother was Josef Stalin. Goldstein was based on Leon Trotsky. Even the Two Minutes Hate was based on a Soviet system. The older members of the Inner Party getting whacked mirrors Stalin's purges. Oceania is the end result of COMMUNISM!

reply

To claim that Josef Stalin was from the left is an insult to intelligent thought. Soviet Union was as much a facist regime as it comes.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

And fascism is an aspect of the left. The right wing, which stands for individualism is incompatible with fascist state where as the left wing which stands for collectivism is perfectly compatible.

reply

The right wing, which stands for individualism
============
When did this happen? In American history, the right wing fought a war (the nation's bloodiest) to protect slavery.

reply

"In American history, the right wing fought a war (the nation's bloodiest) to protect slavery."

THAT'S what you say? The South was LEFT WING, and fought for STATES' RIGHTS! Learn some history before you go babbling that bunch of nonsense. And, FYI, more people died in WWII than the Civil War as far as battle related deaths. Again, get your facts straight before you start spewing out Obama's Kool-Aid!!!!

I'm sorry, Chuck, but that is the stupidest comment I have read on the entire Web!

reply

I did study history. The terms left wing and right wing were invented in France just before the French Revolution; "right wing" referred to the aristocracy and to phony religion. The plantation owners were counterparts to the French aristocracy and they came up with a phony religion ( depicted by Mark Twain in HUCKLEBERRY FINN) that claimed that God approved of slavery. Therefore, they were right wing.

reply

incorrect. There are libertariant right (individualists) and authoritarian right (conservatives). Facists are the latter. Collectivism is not similar to fascism because there is no one leader in colectivism. This is why Soviet Union never got even close to being communist - it had a dictator that is incompatible with communism.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

First off, Orwell was an avowed, unapologetic socialist, of the sort that would have Glenn Beck crying and O'Reilly & Limbaugh screaming their heads off that he's a "commie."

Orwell was such a socialist that he assumed that socialism was going to "win" - and he was worried about it getting corrupted a la Stalinism, hence his two great books "Animal Farm" and then "1984" (as well as other writings) as a warning for leftists not to go the route of Stalinesque fascism.

The fact that in recent years, US Republicans have corrupted Orwell's works as to be just slamming the "left" & "liberals" and "socialists" (without heeding any warning of course for their fascist "right" Tea Party Christian Taliban et al) is just, well, Orwellian!

reply

I first read the book when I was 14 back in the 1980s. Back then, I read it as a strong indictment of communism.

Being older now, I'm able to understand the nuances a bit better and having read Orwell's war time letters, it's easier to understand his political worldview.

The Soviet Union did ally itself with leftists on an international level, but he was as much a murderous bastard that Hitler was (perhaps even worse). The difference between Stalin and Hitler is that the latter was a bit more explicit about his ways while the former knew how to confuse the left by preaching international solidarity.

The Soviet Union, like National Socialist Germany, definitely had left-wing economic policies. But the USSR and Nazi Germany were highly nationalistic, so they are really "right-wing" governments. Kind of like Communist China today, they call themselves socialist, but the economic system is really just a vehicle to advance and expand Chinese influence and nationalism. Just look at the Soviet version of "The Internationale", a song which preached universal brotherhood without borders and the lyrics were bastardized to promote Soviet nationalism.

Which begs the question, why the hell did Hitler attack the USSR? He surely must have been told a million times by his generals that he lacked the fuel to repeat the success he had in France and duplicate it in Russia. Hitler and Stalin were two peas in a pod--I read an anecdote where Hitler was the only human being that Stalin ever truly loved. In fact, after the war, Stalin regretted fighting with Hitler and he waxed nostalgically that he could have ruled the world with him if they remained allies.

reply

The nazis despised, rounded up and slaughtered

Jews
Homosexuals
Socialists
Communists
Charitable Religious groups

Their policies promoted major corporations and greatly favored the wealthy. Does that sound like a left wing group to you? Let me guess, you know that the Nazis were called the National Socialist party and so you decided that they must have been a left wing group? By comparison, in Japan their right wing conservative party is actually called the Liberal Democratic Party. No joke. Its simply a matter of odd translation.

The point is, the Nazis WERE A RADICAL RIGHT WING PARTY. PLEASE GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR *beep* ASS. I don't deny that communism resulted in many more deaths than Hitler's government did, but what you're saying is still *beep*

By the way, George Orwell was a socialist. Check the author bio on the inside of Animal Farm. His fight was against communism.

reply

Nazi's and liberals are very similar.

1) Nazi's executed jews, Liberals execute babies
2) Both Nazi's and Liberals use schools, institutions to indoctrinate people with leftist propaganda
3) Nazi's used to use entertainers and artists to push propaganda, you see the same thing today in movies by liberal actors
4) Nazis and liberals both go to extremes to silence any opposition
5) Nazi's and liberals both punished those who disagree with their agenda
6) Nazi's and liberals believe in gun control
7) Nazi's and liberals both love big government.

So you see, those are just minor examples. Nazi's and liberals are no different from each other, hence Nazi's = Left wing party.

reply

You are very good at News speak and double think. Change that to the right and it would be more accurate.

reply

I think you got conservatives and liberals mixed up.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

The conservative, right-wing coalition of the Australian parliament is also lead by the "Liberal" party, however they use the term for their ECONOMIC ideology, certainly not their social justice ideology. The same goes for the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan.

reply

To the original poster, you're on crack, or just trying to get people worked up, but NOBODY is as blind and stupid as to believe what you're saying. Open your eyes.

reply

====================================================================
To the original poster, you're on crack, or just trying to get people worked up, but NOBODY is as blind and stupid as to believe what you're saying. Open your eyes.
======================================================================

When people offer unsubstantiated insults instead of argument, it just unermines their own case by implying that they have no rational evidence to refute the other side. It's like the conservatives who think that offering random insults of the President advances their cause, when instead it merely makes them look stupid.

reply