Marx vs Pol Pot's Regime


Lots of people seem to argue that the USSR and China didn't follow "true communism". Would these people care to comment on how according to Marx's criteria, I believe the KR was the closest thing we have had to a true communism. Here are the 10 short term objectives of communists according to Marx in the communist manifesto.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.

I don't see how anyone can dispute the fact that the KR implemented 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9. The horrific crimes of the regime came about because these were followed so enthusiastically. Once more they were followed much more than other supposedly communist regimes such as the USSR, point 9 especially!

Although money was abolished, there could still be said to be a heavy graduated income tax in the sense that Cambodian's with more wealth had more taken away from them so point 2 holds. Again abolishing seems to make point 5 redundant. On the other hand credit and currency for external trade was monopolised by the state.

Granted the KR failed to provide free education for all children in public schools. They turned Chao Ponhea Yat High School into Security Prison 21. But they did combine education with industrial production. So perhaps the regime fell short of Marx's vision by not fully fulfilling point 10.

reply

You see a lot of democrats preaching from that list especially 2,3,5,6 and 10. In fact I wonder how many schools even teach the communist manifesto?

reply

Excellent post tornadouk! I think the Khmer Rouge were very pure Marxist-Leninists. The entire belief system is cult-like, genocidal and evil, and they were just following it faithfully.

reply

Marx hypothesized what a communist regime looked like, but he was by no means claiming to be Nostradamus. He certainly didn't claim to lay out the day to day management of what a socialist or communist society would be. That's what Lenin and Stalin and Mao and yes, Pol Pot did. What Marx did do was lay out was a rigid sequence of stages a society will progress through in history. Progressing from a feudal society to a capitalist society to a socialist society and finally to a communist society. As the prime movers of society shift from the aristocracy (feudalism) to the bourgeoisie (capitalism) to the workers (socialism) and finally towards everyone and no one simultaneously (communism). The workings of what a true socialist society will look like are as alien to us living in capitalism as the workings of capitalist society would look to the 12th century feudal lord.

Going by this, even the "communist revolutions" in Russia and China were actually their transition from feudal society to capitalist society despite the trappings of socialism and Marxism. Even Lenin recognized the Soviet Union was not ready to jump right into socialism which is why he instituted the New Economic Policy granting a manner of market economy to the nation. Stalin went back on this and created a simple (actually overly complicated) state capitalist system that persisted in some form until the final dissolution of the USSR. Look at Russia and especially China today. Both nations very much in the tradition of capitalism and imperialism.

reply

I don't recall Marx advocating the elimination of "undesirables."

~ I'm a 21st century man and I don't wanna be here.

reply

Pol Pot killed 2 mio+ people ...
Mao's China have killed over 100 million people.

I wonder which country is the worst in genocide

____________________
This is my opinion. You're welcome to yours, but you will be wrong.

reply

Pol Pot's policies killed almost a third of Cambodian population. So yeah, he receives the top prize for efficiency.

reply