5.4? Really?
I actually enjoyed this movie and thought it would be like a 7.0 rating. Am I one of the few who actually enjoyed this?
shareI actually enjoyed this movie and thought it would be like a 7.0 rating. Am I one of the few who actually enjoyed this?
shareI just watched it and I thought it was pretty funny. It at least deserves a 7
shareIt's a very fun movie, fans of the stars don't get the classic they hoped for, but it's certainly much better than its paltry IMDb rating.
The Spikeopath - Hospital Number 217
Not according to other people. If it was much better, it wouldn't have such a bad rating.
Still Shooting With Film!
I love it alot, when I got a video Recorder on Xmas 1990, it was one of the first movies I taped off TV, When DVD's came out it wasn't out in Region 2 so I imported a Region 1 copy, now I'm watching it in HD. I guess I grew up with it so it can do no wrong in my eyes.
shareRemember as a kid watching it thinking what a letdown that it was a period piece. With these two guys it would have been better in a gritty modern setting, and not a comedy. More of a HARRY'S DIRTY SHARKY BANDIT or something.
My Review:
http://www.cultfilmfreaks.com/2016/05/cityHEAT.html
All Movie Reviews www.cultfilmfreaks.com
[deleted]
I thought it was ok. Like a 5 out of 10.
shareI liked it and rated it a 7/10.
shareI'm not sure why this got such a bad rep. I rated it a 7, gave me me some solid laughs and the shoot-out scenes were great. Maybe expectations were too high at the time and people were expecting a classic?
share