In general, what they do or don't do procedure or equipment-wise in Hollywood movies is not a good indication of real life, and certainly staging and framing of the scene in the police car would have taken precedence over realism in the choices that were made (you wouldn't have been able to see the star's face if the car had a cage).
However, in reality police cars did not begin to have cages (screens) until gradually starting in the '70s, and it was still by no means universal in the early '80s when BHC was made. For example, if you watch '70s police shows such as "Adam 12" in which real (or realistic) police cars were shown, none of them had cages or screens even in big city agencies such as the LAPD.
Before screens, it was standard procedure in some agencies to handcuff the arrestee (sometimes with their hands in front of them) and put them into the front passenger seat next to the officer so he could keep an eye on them on the way to jail. If it was a two officer unit, in some agencies the procedure was for the second officer to sit in the back seat with the arrestee on the way to jail and watch the arrestee, and to restrain him if he became combative or tried to get loose. As dangerous as those things sound, before cages became commonplace, there weren't many better options.
It's just one of many aspects of law enforcement equipment and procedural evolutions since BHC was made 30+ years ago.
reply
share