I dunno......
To me, this is yet another reexamination of the British ‘class system’. It was an interesting story, but obviously being filmed in the 80's, they didn't want to show anything more physical/gay with the boys other than lying together in the bottom of a boat in full clothes. I guess you could argue that was in keeping with the play, but I craved more.
On the one hand we're supposed to feel sympathy for the boys who are caught up in living the lives of their parents before them and what their 'well-bred' parents want them to be. Notice in some of the 'smoking room' scenes where the boys are so into playing adult roles, that they all stick their hands into their pockets at the same time-as if on cue. Also, we're given the fact that so many of the boys have had gay sex with the one character(Guy)that he can blackmail them all if he wanted to-classic hypocrisy of the rich. It's all pretty boring really, to see the depiction of rich boys at play. The only salient part of the movie for me was when Guy took the caning because he loved James so much that he didn't want his name and reputation sullied-that dialog was heart wrenching and realisitc. And to that end, I would have liked to see more of the actual romance and less of the privileged posturing going on.
Even the 'sex scene' at the beginning when the two boys are caught-both with sweaty faces, humping and yet both with their underwear still intact but their trousers down, is a concession to the barely mentionable, unseen act of homosexuality in 80's films (safer for the producer/director). What exactly were they supposed to be doing...dry humping?? I'm pretty sure, although I didn't live in that period, that the methods of gay sex were much like we practice today, correct?