MovieChat Forums > Three's a Crowd (1984) Discussion > Interesting information about this show

Interesting information about this show


I just did a bit of research about this since, after seeing some of the episodes on Antenna TV, I was curious as to why it vanished so quickly. According to news articles of the time, this show finished higher in the ratings than "Miami Vice" during the 1984-85 season. What's more, it had about the same popularity of "Who's the Boss." Interesting, when you consider how long those other two survived. Also, "Three's a Crowd" began it's run with decent ratings (one of ABC's few modest successes that season), yet after showing initial promise (September-October 1984) was already considered for the chopping-block within a few months (February-March 1985). Also of note is that plans were underway, in the spring of 1985, for a second season in which Stuart Pankin would join the cast as the next door neighbor. Most intriguing, Season Two was to begin with the leads getting married (see "The Philadelphia Inquirer" 10 April 1985 p.D11 for these last two points). Moreover, after the show was announced as cancelled in early May, 1985, it was shown in reruns throughout the summer. I located several articles that list it as finishing in the top ten rated programs for the week, even as late as the early part of September. On the flip-side, ABC was really struggling at that time and John Ritter was making a lot of money ($100,000 per episode). Still, when the show finished taping in February, 1985, plans were to begin work on it again that August. I suppose the rumor (which I was unable to verify via my search) of John Ritter turning-down ABC's offer of a half-season renewal is the reason it did not last. Regardless, while it wasn't necessarily a good show, it seems that it may have perhaps been cancelled prematurely.

By the way, most of the information I gleaned was from the "Boston Globe," "New York Times," "Philadelphia Inquirer," and "Providence Journal" as well as the Canadian publications "The Gazette" (Montreal) and "The Globe and Mail" (Toronto).

reply

Wow! Never knew all that! Stuart Pankin would've been a great addition to the show like Tambor was to the Ropers. So the main reason they dumped the show was Ritter's salary? Due to his love of acting you would think John would've taken a pay cut or deferred payment to keep it going!

reply

megafauna:

Good question, but I uncovered no evidence that John Ritter's salary was the cause. I just included that information because it may have been pertinent. Regardless, in the very least it could have been a factor since it likely meant this was a somewhat expensive show.

reply

I had no ideq TAC actually beat Miami Vice in the ratings! Miami Vice was HUGE back then! Since TAC was such a big hit why didn't ABC offer a full season renewal??

reply

Apparently "Miami Vice," while creating a stir in it's initial season, wasn't watched by a lot of folks (that would come later). As I recall, TAC ranked in the upper 30s (Nielsen) in the 1984-85 season, while "Vice" ranked in the low 40s. I don't believe TAC was considered a hit, but just average (ratings-wise).

reply

Yes, Jack and Vicky would have gotten married and Vicky would have been given birth to twins. Thats what happened in the original British series. Its a shame, Jack and the babies could have made for some great comedy.

reply

The character of Jack Tripper had run his course by that point. The whole "I'm a swinging bachelor who chases all kinds of women" was done to death, and his new domesticated life just didn't catch on with anybody.

reply