MovieChat Forums > Phar Lap (1984) Discussion > Somewhat disappointed

Somewhat disappointed

posted 18 years ago by MrPrudence04
3 replies | jump to latest

I thought Simon Wincer did an alright job of telling this story, although with a subject like Phar Lap he wasn't too hard pushed to stir emotions in the viewer, particularly if they're of Australian origin. To be truthful, it does fall short of the mark in some respect.

To start with, I didn't think the film's sequence of starting with his death, flashing back through the horse's life then back to the death really worked. I thought it was disjointed and didn't achieve anything. The death itself was also not treated with the proper attention given the enormous amount of hearsay and speculation about the poisoning and other circumstances surrounding Phar Lap's untimely end. We are pretty much picked up and dropped at the end of the film.

Also, the very title of this film "Phar Lap: Hero to a Nation" isn't indiciative of the film's focus. A country that was suffering through the torments of depression had its hopes lifted by a single horse, and I felt this wasn't given enough emphasis. The only real glimpse we got of the people's struggle was Harry Telford's wife complaining that they didn't have enough money. It really neeeded more of a macro perspective. Phar Lap was a legend for more reason than just winning races. He symbolised something far greater and helped resurrect an entire nation out of despair.

Some parts of the film were quite good, and before watching it I was hoping that it wouldn't be too sappy or indulgent with the orchestral backdrop. I was relieved to see that it was quite sincere in this respect, and the constumes and set were very fitting. The acting also was commendable, particularly Ron Liebman playing David Davis, who seemed to be channeling Al Pacino at certain moments.

Overall I came away feeling a little disappointed with the treatment the film gave a figure such as Phar Lap. However, listening to Wincer's interview with Tommy Woodcock on the DVD Special Features is well worth hiring it, but prepare to cringe at Wincer questioning him on what he thought of his movie.

6/10

[–] BallsJr 18 years ago

I agree with all you say dearprudence (is that a Beatles homage?) and you have made me reconsider things here. As much as I have loved this film throughout the years, there has always been these nagging thoughts that it could have been considerably better. I think I possibly didn't let myself delve into what these reasons could be because I didn't want to disrespect the film (and therefore the horse), of which I have loved my whole life...but all that you say makes sense. If they ever remake it, your points should be of automatic consideration and sent express post to the filmmakers!

Cheers

[–] MrPrudence04 18 years ago

Thanks mate (yes it's a Beatles homage).

The film does have its stature in the industry, which is why I think they'd be wary of a remake. But it should definitely be considered.

[–] BallsJr 18 years ago

Certainly...I'd support it all the way! Can never have enough movies about the true champions...

Am not sure how familiar you are with Australian racing history (or if you reside here) but I've always wanted to see a film made about Tulloch also. He was without doubt one of the best Aussie gallopers of the late 50's/early 60's and had quite a dramatic career, the story of which I believe would suit a well-made film. Many still argue whether he was our greatest ever horse - better even than Phar Lap - but that's too tough a call. I am sure it's too much to expect it will ever be made (even if only for the small screen) but geez, I'd love to see it happen... In years to come, Makybe Diva would make a great film too!

Time to shut up...the babbling has begun! Cheers mate