Went for it ...

[deleted]

But that's what these movies want to do: Entertain. What would you do to improve the movies? This one had a stupid ending, I admid, but aside from that, what could you change without destroying what makes Bud Spencer & Terence Hill movies so entertaining?

And keep in mind that this is 30+ years old and had a budget that wouldn't last a month with current productions.

these are all great points you're making, i don't know what the term "feel good movie" means really, i hear it mentioned alot, but i know these hill / spencer movies literary makes for a feel good movie experience, and they suit all ages, interesting your comment on budget, their last three or so movies in the 1980's, especially "miami supercops" has a really cheap vibe about it, on the contrary their 1994 movie really looks good, sharp and well made though. the mood of this reminded of the "smokey and the bandit", and the lead actress in this (featured on the poster) was in the third instalment of that franchise. a major plus in this is that it also stars the guy from "blazing saddles" which also joined hill and spencer in the only critic praised movie besides the two trinity flicks "crime busters" (1976), another of mel brooks' actors joined them in "the troublemakers" (1994). sure this has some flaws, but all together this is great fun with a neat plot, many think their movies after the trinity flicks stink, but lately i've come to really enjoy these other pieces, i don't know if they're starting to age good or something.



🚛 🛣 👊 🤛 🤜




autumn felt like summer still,
chill couldnt compare with your body heat,
mind swayin on curves i got lost in your big brown hair,
at calm water surfin on your heat waves,
not common woman standin out from ordinary everyday,
along magic she been away for days leaves goin down,
in evenin sun my world felt dying out,
next dawn awoke you brought springtime.

I found it to be okay for the most part. 5.8/10 for me