MovieChat Forums > The Big Chill (1983) Discussion > I've seen the famous deleted scene

I've seen the famous deleted scene


For what it's worth: I have seen the deleted scene! I was one of those people in the test audience. In my audience, no one was "hysterical". Rather, everyone was startled and confused. "WTF?" was the reaction, because there had been no flashback scenes earlier, and it was out of place, came without warning, and made no real sense.

Here is what I recall, more than 30 years later. They were living in what looked like a single story house, rather old and run down. Karen was cooking; the conversation reveals it to be Thanksgiving, and Sam and Michael are off at a protest rally against the war. Alex is asleep, face down on a ratty sofa. I don't recall what the other female characters were doing, but Karen was talking to at least one of them. She is putting the final touches on the dining room table. She's wearing what used to be called a 'peasant dress' - a white shift, full length, with flower embroidery at the neck. She wanders into the bathroom. There's a man taking a shower, presumably Harold, hidden by the curtain. She opens the toilet lid, recoils in disgust, and flushes the toilet, causing the cold water to shut off for the man in the shower, and he flails and shouts. (Which drew the intended laughs).

Back in the dining room, Michael and Sam walk in, Sam carrying a bullhorn. Sam looks ridiculous, the costume designer put him in a headband like people wore in the late 60s but on him it looked bad. Michael is sporting a huge 'fro and maybe a beard.

They all start to gather around the table, and Alex is woken up. He is designated to carve the turkey. The final shot is his POV at the turkey, and he keeps moving the carving knife around, he can't make a decision on where to start cutting. And that's the end.

In my questionnaire on the movie, I suggested cutting that scene. (See, it's partly my fault). The scene didn't work because it was out of place with the rest of the movie; there hadn't been any other flashbacks, so it was jarring. Michael and Sam both looked silly, and the point was completely lost.
If Kasdan's reason for the final shot (above) was to demonstrate Alex's inability to make a decision... well, we'd already learned that throughout the movie.

It was just pointless.

reply

Thanks, that's so interesting!

Even though this movie is dear to my heart, I only learned about the final flashback just now in the Trivia section and I was intrigued. Sounds like your--and Kasdan's--instincts were right and it was better to leave it out.

reply

Thanks for the info. Now we know! My guess as to why William Hurt (Nick) wasn't included was because he was in Vietnam, getting the "experience" he was looking for that sadly left him impotent.
I agree that the scene wouldn't have worked, particularly with Tom Berenger and Jeff Goldblum as stereotypical hippies.

reply

That sounds kinda eerie at the end of the scene knowing what Alex does to himself. I do wish we could see Kevin Costner in this still. Weird how he's in this but not in this. The only scene being the body getting dressed.

reply

Thanks for sharing this.

reply

This response is nearly a year late, but I don't care. I just want to thank you for describing the fabled "deleted scene".

I agree that the scene wasn't really necessary, but I do envy your experience of seeing it. The Big Chill is one of my favorite movies. I like knowing all there is to know about it.

Thanks again!

reply

I am glad this scene didn't make the movie's final cut but I wouldn't mind seeing it as an extra on a future DVD or on YouTube at my own discretion.








"'Extremely High Voltage.' Well, I don't need safety gloves, because I'm Homer SimpsonZZZzzzNNNnnn--" - Frank Grimes

reply

I think they should have left that scene in, but with better wardrobe. That would have explained more about Alex. No, I never got the sense that Alex had trouble making big life decisions. What we learn is that he thought he made a big wrong decision. That doesn't mean he's indecisive or paranoid about making decisions.

But in the end, maybe the point is that we don't know why Alex killed himself, and it doesn't matter that we don't know he had trouble making decisions.

reply

Thanks for this. That scene might have been good at the start of the movie or maybe the end during the credits. But maybe better left out. Most people had already been bombarded enough w 60's hippy wear, styles, the war and culture etc in movies even by 1983.

Better just any regular looking 30s crowd recalling their college days would appeal to more general audiences of any generation.

reply