MovieChat Forums > 10 to Midnight (1983) Discussion > Gene Siskel's print review.

Well, at least he liked it better than Ebert did.

"It's not that tough being a film cricket."

reply

Ebert calls it a "scummy little sewer of a movie" as if that's a BAD thing.

What do you think this is, a signature? It's a way of life!

reply

Yet Last House on the Left is a much bigger sewer. Go figure.

reply

I think Ebert gave it 0 stars. Siskel still didn't recommend it here, but at least he saw some potential in it.

reply

They were tough to please.

reply