MovieChat Forums > Poltergeist (1982) Discussion > Poltergeist’s PG rating was a crime agai...

Poltergeist’s PG rating was a crime against kids of the ’80s


https://www.polygon.com/2020/10/3/21497819/scariest-pg-movies-poltergeist-scenes-clown-tree-pool-skeletons

I haven’t seen a horror film since I was nine years old. That’s when Steven Spielberg and Jack Valenti scarred me for life.

Spielberg was responsible for 1982’s Poltergeist; Valenti was responsible for the Motion Picture Association of America. And both are responsible for turning Poltergeist, a haunted-house horror masterpiece (I’ll grant it that) from a unanimously-rated R to a PG on appeal.

This was before PG-13 ratings, a period well documented in pop culture. Except very little of it mentions Poltergeist. Films like Red Dawn (the first PG-13), Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Gremlins are more considered the rating’s spiritual ancestors. But Poltergeist made it necessary.

In Connie Bruck’s 2001 profile of Valenti in The New Yorker, Spielberg, after haranguing the MPAA over Poltergeist’s rating, is said to have promised Richard Heffner, chairman of the ratings board to “get that for you.” He meant the creation of PG-13, or some rating between PG and R. To me, that’s evidence enough that Spielberg knew Poltergeist was no PG movie — which in 1982 was basically taken as a G without animation or the Disney logo.

But Spielberg, Valenti and Poltergeist distributor MGM still browbeat Heffner into re-screening the movie for the ratings board. And, lo and behold, a panel that had been 24-0 in favor of R was now 20-4 for PG. “The fix was in,” Heffner said later, meaning Valenti got to the jurors. MGM and Spielberg needed that kid-tested-mother-approved PG rating if it was going to make any money, and Valenti was gonna do them a solid.

I saw Poltergeist on HBO in 1983, toward the end of my fourth-grade year. I don’t think I slept for a month. When I tried, I reverted to a fetal posture; less surface area for the evil tree to grab. It doesn’t help that, at this time, I also used my closet light as a nightlight. The glowing bedroom closet was a big part of Poltergeist. That was where “The Beast” lived, right? I can’t really remember for sure because, you know, I only watched the thing once.

Here’s the part where you guess I saw the movie by myself or at a friend’s house, given the broad license to watch anything PG. Here’s where you’re wrong. The only thing my parents ever forbade me and my brother from watching was The Dukes of Hazzard, probably because my dad’s name is Roscoe.

And as for Poltergeist, I found out the rating didn’t matter.

“Dad, did you know Poltergeist was originally rated R?” I said, after reading The New Yorker profile.

“No,” he said. “So what?”

“So, you told me and Brendan to watch it when I was nine, I guess because it was PG,” I said.

“No, I saw that the year before. I thought you and your brother would like it.”

“You what?!” I demanded. “You actually recommended that? After seeing it? What were you thinking?!”

Dad dug in and went Red Forman on me. “I was thinking, what the fuck, kids like being scared,” Dad said. “Quit being a [wimp].”

Like being scared? Like this was a ride at Carowinds? My ass! This film is not a “boo!” followed by giggles and squeals. This movie is an evil tree plunging through the bedroom window, dragging your ass outside.

Twenty-four MPAA ratings reviewers saw all this and said, “Yep, that’s an R!” Who could argue? Spielberg, that’s who. According to Bruck’s profile, he insisted that the film was PG because it was “all threat and fantasy, no reality.”

To which I say, fuck you, mister! This movie is jam-packed with stuff to specifically and intentionally terrify children. It’s not limited to the clown, the tree (Spielberg is said to have taken inspiration from one that creeped him out as a child), and the bedroom closet. The evil is in the TV! There’s one in every room to take you straight to hell! You’re not safe inside your own home, especially at night (which is always strobe-lit by lightning). Are there monsters buried under your house? No? Yes? How do you know? Do you like swimming in a swimming pool? No sharks in a swimming pool, right? Just your disinterred neighbors.

No, Spielberg, MGM, and good pal Valenti wanted a PG on this because it was a summer movie that needed a wide audience, the kind you get with a drop-the-kids-off-and-go-shopping PG. MGM had bought United Artists the year before and the deal wasn’t going so well. The company needed a hit, and Valenti needed MGM to keep paying its MPAA dues. Poltergeist was indeed the first box office hit of the MGM/UA period, but it hardly mattered. MGM’s business would be reorganized and sold repeatedly over the rest of the decade.

After the betrayal, of Spielberg to his audience, Valenti to his ratings board, the ratings board to the rest of us, and, of course, Dad to me and my brother, I adopted a hard “no scary movies” policy that remains in effect to this day.

reply

Oooh boy, what a little bitch this guy is. I saw Poltergeist when I was in 4th grade. It wasn't that big of a deal to me. I was more scared of things like The Day After. Nuclear war was a real threat and the depictions in that movie were terrifying. Still, I don't look back as an adult and bitch about my parents letting me watch it.

Aside from that, WTF is his point about PG-13? Or even an R rating?

From the article:

“Dad, did you know Poltergeist was originally rated R?” I said, after reading The New Yorker profile.

“No,” he said. “So what?”

“So, you told me and Brendan to watch it when I was nine, I guess because it was PG,” I said.

“No, I saw that the year before. I thought you and your brother would like it.”

So why exactly does the rating matter here? The father saw it. He told his kids to watch it, knowing what it was. So how exactly would a PG-13 (or even R) rating matter? So stupid.

Finally, the whole concept of PG-13 brings up this exact conversation again and again. It's parental guidance. In other words, the parents should understand the content and provide guidance on whether their child should watch it. PG-13 is just a way for lazy parents to shirk their responsibilities as parent. PG and PG-13 should effectively be the same thing - the parent decides if it's appropriate or not.

reply

This movie isn't scary nor does it deserve an R rating. PG was the appropriate rating for Poltergeist. I totally agree with you about PG-13, it is the most redundant, idiotic rating ever, PG means that some material may be inappropriate for children, if a child gets scared easily then the parent should probably be supervising them while they watch Poltergeist. I have outlined a time line documenting parental stupidity:

1984: Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom comes out with a PG rating and parents throw a fit even though the rating warned them that it might be inappropriate for children and heck even the VHS has an additional warning on the back saying "this film may be too intense for young children". Also did they even see the first movie??? What did they expect? Anyways because of this they insist on a PG-13 rating so they would know if the movie was really, really inappropriate for children

1992: Batman Returns comes out with the PG-13 rating that they insisted on after Temple of Doom and they still complain about the violence even though this was once again a sequel to another movie that was also very dark and violent. Basically they complained that they needed a rating to know if the movie was not appropriate for children under 13, they get the rating then take their under 13 aged children to see it and complain that it's too violent???

2016: Deadpool comes out with an R rating meaning it's for Adults only, parents take their kids to see it because apparently all comic book movies are for children (even though most of them are rated PG-13???), they then complain there is too much violence, language, sex and nudity even though it was RATED R!!!

You literally cannot make this stuff up. I bet next they will complain that videos on pornhub are not appropriate for children.

reply