MovieChat Forums > Night Shift (1982) Discussion > That’s not what synthesizers are for.

That’s not what synthesizers are for.


Whenever I found myself starting to enjoy act three that damn synthesized song came on. Now I am not denouncing Burt Bacharach’s genius. Nor is this a spur against Rod Stewart (although I am far from a fan.) The fact that the song is required at 95% of all weddings, bar mitzvahs and every middle school dance I can remember, is a fact that I assume doesn’t help. It would even be more tolerable if the music cues were actual string instruments, be it violin, guitar, piano, harp, anything. Hell a banjo would have at least made me laugh. But Nooo. It’s the early eighties and we now have synthesizers. We must only use them. It’s the way of the future.
I only realized in retrospect that I even lowered my rating because of “That’s what friend are for.” (shudder) It was a very enjoyable movie otherwise. Winkler does a fantastic job through his character’s transition. It’s always fun to watch Keaton be Keaton. This is the only time I recall liking Shelly Long in anything. And as proven repeatedly, Ron Howard knows what he is doing. But the score must go!




http://www.dvdaficionado.com/dvds.html?id=spoll

reply

I don't know what you're talking about. Synths are totally the future and that soundtrack doesn't sound dated in the least. Now excuse me while I watch my Betamax version of Tron. I'd say more, but I'm still having trouble connecting to CompuServe from my new Apple IIe.

The future is now.

reply

Am I missing something? Why let a synth. spoil a scene, let alone an entire film such as this. What a great film. The soundtrak completes it. If fyou listen closely youcan hear Marshall Crenshaw in the restaurant scene...unless you have a problem with beig a proud owner of that particular burger steak.

rabidgoldfish65

reply