Costumes


The costumes in this movie are ghastly and do not evoke the era. Though I adore Maggie Smith, her costumes are the worst.

reply

Hi MissWatusi,

I have to disagree with you on Anthony Powell's costumes. The bias cut silhouettes were very much part of the 30s era and I appreciated how Rigg moved in the costumes. Powell limited his color scheme primarily to white, black and red for the women's costumes and I thought it looked terrific on screen.

reply

Some of the costumes are stunning, but like the rest of the film they're sort of an otherworldly confection rather than a careful evocation of the period.

I think EUTS takes place in the spring or summer of 1939. (The insurance papers Poirot reviews in bed are dated November, 1938, and refer to events he describes as happening "some months ago." Since the story could hardly take place after September 1, 1939, the setting seems to be quite specific.) The skirts are too long for so late in the decade, and the clinging, bias-cut silhouette had been out of fashion for a couple of years by then. But, as I said, it's all done for effect rather than accuracy (like the gorgeous but OTT hats).

reply

The OP's criticism about Maggie Smith's costumes echoes Mrs. Redfern's famous line:

"Do you mind me saying something, Miss Castle? Your ensemble does absolutely nothing for you. Goodbye."

Classic.

reply

[deleted]

The costumes only suggest the 1930s (more mid than late) while actually staying pretty close to the style aesthetic of around 1980-81 when the film was made. Jane Birkin's stylist last outfit looks very much like something Joan Collins would wear on Dynasty.

reply

I disagree too. I think the costume design was amazing. If you look at the high end fashion of the 30's - especially the late 30's, it's remarkably similar. There was a real 80's feel to it...however, I believe the 80's did full circle and adapted the big shoulder/ruched dresses etc from the 30's. Check out these pics
[http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y219/InThisWhyteHouze/vivienleigh_Annex_02.jpg]
[https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/1d/3a/5e/1d3a5ec2c8510633acc9fd2562c6f945.jpg]
[http://classicmoviechat.com/2012/08/]
[http://www.elle.com/fashion/news/a3306/fashion-figure-gilbert-adrian-1424/]

reply

I couldn't stop noticing all of the Bakealite (spelling)jewelry, whether authentic or not, worn by all of the women throughout this film. Gaudy necklaces, bracelets and earrings, worn by the wealthy women and the ones not so wealthy, and mixed in with their diamonds and other jewels. I believe this costume jewelry was a huge trend during the period depicted. Some of this "plastic" jewelry is now worth hundreds or thousands of dollars in today's antique/vintage market. It was such a noticeable and interesting contrast to the overall theme of this film, to discover a stolen diamond. I loved it along with the rest of this movie.

reply

Well, the costumes - especially those of Arlena and Daphne - just screamed 1980-ties to me! I was so annoyed!

reply