MovieChat Forums > Diner (1982) Discussion > Questions for female viewers

Questions for female viewers


I know many women who detest (I mean, are filled with hate) towards "male bonding" movies like Sideways and Swingers. (But it's not okay for guys to hate Sex in the City...OK, another topic).

Question for women who've seen this movie.....what are your feelings? The "Football test" sequence should be reason enough for reasonable women to hate this film (I am a guy and I thought the football test was infuriating when I first saw the film, but after a few viewings I realized what Levinson was saying about the character). And then there's Bogie.....what do women think of this film? Thanks.

Human Beings...Wow

reply

At first I laughed about the football test. How ridiculous for a "test" to determine whether or not you're going to marry someone! BUT, it was obvious that Guttenburg's character was a bit anal and obsessive...I think the football test was an important part of proving his character...staying true to it. Then, there's part of me that thinks maybe it wasn't such a bad idea. I mean, the man was obviously football obsessed and he wanted to make sure the woman he married (spent the rest of his life with!) KNEW something about the subject that was most important to him...that they'd have something to talk about, enjoy together; as opposed to what the "record organization" scene between Shrevie and his wife showed?

Bogie. Hmmm. I think the movie started out showing Bogie as a very shallow man. A gambler and womanizer. But, as the movie progressed, his needs changed and his character developed into someone a little less selfish. He began to desire a more rewarding career (rather than the one that would just attract women) and a more intimate relationship.

www.myspace.com/talesfromthetrenches

reply

OK guys - first off it's Boogie (not Bogie)!

I am a guy - originally from Baltimore - hung out at the Diner and a year or so behind BL. It's not that Eddie was obsessed with Football - he was obsessed with the Baltimore Colts (as was just about every other kid growing up in Baltimore during that time period). The movie explained that very well (with the quiz) AND by having Eddie have the organ player play the Baltimore Colts marching song with his walk down the aisle.

By the way, the real Boogie - was a failure in high school but went on to becoming a great businessman - starting the Merry-go-Round clothing store (and then later, Boogie's Diner).

reply

I know he was specifically obsessed with the Colts (Colts fight song and Colts colors for the wedding?! Don't think we don't see some of that here in Indianapolis!LOL)...but, generally, with football, right? The quiz was about football in general, not just the Colts? Unfortunately, I don't know enough about football to discern!

And Boogie (oops) is a real person? Diner is a true story? I seriously had NO idea when I watched it!!

www.myspace.com/talesfromthetrenches

reply

There was this Diner (Old Hilltop Diner in Northwest Baltimore that got big with late teenagers and early 20s in the late 50s) - we frequented there all of the time - mostly after hanging out at the Northwest Bowling Lanes and/or Ameche's Drive-in restaurant (Alan Ameche was a start running back for the Colts (drafted 1955) and scored the winning touchdown in the overtime game against the Giants) - anyway, all of the places we hung out were within blocks of each other on Reisterstown Road. Barry Levinson was part of this crowd and the movie became his intertwining with friends (like Modell and Boogie, etc.) - the writing became great but Barry had many true experiences to choose from.

reply

Well...good to know. Thanks so much for sharing!

Dawn

www.myspace.com/talesfromthetrenches

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Hm. You have a lot of knowledge about the Colts yourself...Eddie? Heh heh

reply

OK, I'm a woman who detested both "Sideways" and "Swingers." I just didn't get them, at all.

However, I love "Diner." In fact, I own "Diner." In contrast, I've watched "Sex and the City," but I certainly didn't love "Sex and the City."

Why do I like "Diner" better than the male bonding films or, say, "SATC?" I guess there's something about the characters in that one that seems much more real to me than any of the others you mentioned. I can see young adult men having conversations like the "Diner" guys did and acting goofy with each other, whereas when the middle-aged men of "Sideways" did that, I just thought they needed to grow up and stop being losers.

As for "SATC," I thought it was stupid until I moved to NYC for work for a couple of years. Then, I realized that it was almost a documentary. Most of the women who were 15 years older than I am and lived there most of their adult lives did indeed behave like Carrie and Samantha. Therefore, I had a much easier time relating to MEN who talk about music and hold grudges against their high school classmates (in "Diner") than I did with WOMEN who sleep around and buy $400 shoes as a form of therapy (in "SATC").

reply

Diner is one of my super all-time-favorites. The football test is funny, and also tells a lot about Eddie's personality and his fears about getting married. Boogie's a mess, manipulative and desperate but he has a heart. Just cuz it's about male bonding doesn't mean women can't identify with it, the characters may be men but their gender doesn't automatically render their flaws/dreams/anxieties/personalities etc. unrecognizable or unsympathetic.

Plus it's funny and sweet, the acting is great, and the proto-Seinfeld dialog is relatable and well-done.

(P.S. I'm female :p )

reply

I love Diner. I loved it when it came out. I love it now. These guys aren't awful. They are a little clueless about the ways of women (as women are clueless about the ways of men). Well, who isn't clueless sometimes?? This movie is hilarious and touching. I also love Swingers and Sideways. (Sideways has Giamatti as a real hero, though, which is a bit of male fantasy, but hey, we can all dream I guess. And he's verbal, which is better than good lookin'!) And when Elise walks down to the "very tasteful" Colts marching song--well, what else can you ask for? Eddie is just scared--and who isn't scared, really, of commitment?



reply

just watched this for the first time. I didn't hate it. I enjoyed "ranking" the men on hotness. (Mickey? Tim? I'm still not sure which is #1). The football quiz was ridiculous..! Lucky gal.. ugh. But he seemed so not really into this specific girl -- shrugging about marrying her, it's what you are supposed to do and all that -- was this his version of cold feet? I felt a little bad for daniel stern loving his records and his wife being totally "so what!?" about it. though i couuld never do the alphabetical/year/genre filing thing.. i think i may have to watch again, though -- the sound was really low and i missed a lot. i also missed the end credits where they are talking more, like paul reiser going on about how chickens, humans and other animals rose from swamps.. lol..

Dainty things never shrink from Lux!

reply

Had I been the gal who was expected to pass that football test, I would have thought up one of my own to give him that he would find impossible to pass! Also, the guy obsessed with his records, I think I would have had to scramble them all up, or put them out with the garbage if they were that much more important than his wife!!!

reply

Im a 20 year old girl and i happen to love swingers but diner more, especially bc of what a looker mickey rourke was, and i also love the 50s setting. i think these movies are a lot better films than sex and the city...
i take them for what they are. i happen to find a group of guys sitting around talking very entertaining, maybe because i'm a girl and its like seeing the other side. theres also a different dynamic between a group of guys.. theres a brotherhood bond that usually lacks in catty, backstabbing girls. i highly doubt there is a group of 5 girl friends who are genunine towards one another or have a bond like a group of guys do.
overall, theyre both movies, and i love movies.

reply

Haven't seen Sideways or Swingers......REFUSE to see SATC........loved Diner. I thought the football test was a perfect illustration of a young man's fear of marriage and a woman's fear of spinsterhood, especially in that time period. As a few characters repeat several times, "That's just what you do. It's what everyone does." Whether it's right for you or not. That being said, I'll be an old maid before I'd take a 140 question quiz in order to get married LOL

reply

I don't think I'd take the football test either. That being said, I think this movie is okay. It is more of a guy flick but, women can be just as nutty. If we put ourselves in their shoes, then their antics can be funny.

I loved 'Sideways' by the way and I cannot stand 'Sex in the City'.

http://www.cgonzales.net & http://www.drxcreatures.com

reply

I like male bonding movies actually. Like someone said on this thread, it makes me look at the other side.

reply

It is more of a guy flick, but it does remind me of some of the guy friends I had when I was 18, and some of the asinine topics we would chat about. I did prefer this film when I was younger, watched it over and over again lol. But entering my mid 20's, it's a little too much male immaturity for me to stomach too often.

Rourke is soo attractive in this, one of his more memorable 80's performances. Along with Rumble Fish, I started to develop a hugh crush on 80's Rourke. Him and Barkin are the characters I feel closest to. Stern's character comes off as a familiar type who just needs his male friends and banter, that is his world. He hasnt grown up quite yet, but Stern plays the part perfectly imo, underrated performance.

Tim Daly is a sore point in the film though. His character is different in a good way, but it is a rather flat performance, and the character is unlikeable. It does remind me though of when you return to your old friends after living in a different world, and feel mildly disconnected. Daly however carries no real charisma in this film, compared to say Kevin Bacon playing an abrasive, annoying yet loveable character.

Also, the characters never seem to sleep! It is party season I guess, but we continually see them at the diner into the morning, often followed by other activities. Modell is a complete enigma, which works for the character.



reply

But it's not okay for guys to hate Sex in the City
Really?!? I despise Sex in the City and I am a girl. One night my husband comes home from work and wants to watch it. That was a bit curious to me.


mulder it's me
http://janayime.tumblr.com/

reply

Loved Sideways, actually seen it three times and made my husband check it out too. Haven't seen Swingers since I was in high school, remember liking it then. The Sex and the City movie failed as a movie because they were just trying to cram an entire season of a show into one movie on top of forcing problems onto the characters just so they could have some drama.

This movie, I did not enjoy. I liked the beginning of the movie, but as it went on and you got to know the characters better it felt hard for me to believe they would actually hang out together outside of the diner. To me it felt like it would have been more believable if they had their own completely separate lives, but the diner was the one place they came together and bonded. I also felt the problems with Stern and Barkin were solved just a little too easily at the end of the movie with him suggesting they go on vacation. I would have preferred if that just wasn't resolved at all. Same with Rourke's gambling debt just being taken care of. Some aspects of the movie were very believable, but then you had all these little things that just took you out of it.

reply

I'm female and loved this movie. It's totally not my husband's cup of tea; he loves movies with any kind of action. Dramas, even dramedies like this one, with the characters mostly just sitting around and talking, bore him to no end.

For me, the conversational bonding scenes at the diner were my favorite parts. These are just the type of slightly meaningless, yet meaningful to us, conversations that me and my girlfriends often have. Conversations about music, movies, the opposite sex, etc.

There really wasn't one weak link in the cast, although Tim Daly's character was never really fully fleshed out for me. But heck, he sure did look good! Every character had his charms, even Kevin Bacon's Fenwick, who I found extremely annoying and bratty. I found myself pissed at Daniel Stern's Shrevie, and thought he was very mean to his wife, but I could tell he felt badly about their argument, and made it up to her later. To me, he was the prime example of a guy of the time who did what was expected of him (got married) because it was the thing to do for a guy his age, but never really grew up or matured because he still had his friends in his life, and they still did the same things.

I think I loved the character of Modell the best. He was Paul Reiser to a T, the nebbishy mooch who you liked anyway.

reply

I'm a woman who enjoys "male bonding" movies. I neither absolutely loved nor absolutely hated this one. Wouldn't call it a masterpiece, but there's a lot that's good here.

That said, the football test drove me up the wall (although, yes, I understood the filmmakers' point). When it was first mentioned, I imagined that the brie -to-be would be asked things like "What's a conversion? or "What exactly does a quarterback do?". Although I still wouldn't like the idea of having the wedding depend on the exercise, I wouldn't think it was asking too much for her to know those basic things about football because it meant so much to him.

But the questions? And the way all of his guy buddies were standing around while he was testing her? Then hearing the pleading for him to consider her performance "passing"? The whole thing made me almost angry. Besides that, I thought it went way over the top in showing that Shrevie was obviously not ready for marriage. Even given the time period, I found it unrealistic that everyone involved seemed to accept and participate in this testing ritual except for thinking that the questions were too hard.

As far as Shrevie went, I hated the way he treated his wife in the "keep-my records-organized" scene, but I thought that there was an important point there: people forget that spouses are like roommates in a sense and that "sharing your life with another person" involves far more than the symbolic. He should have liked the fact that his wife was playing the records because that meant that she was "getting into" his music a bit, but she should have put things back where she got them--a basic rule for living with someone.
We always see cliched scenes of marriage about the man not putting the toilet seat down, making a mess in a room the wife has just cleaned, or not putting the dishes in the sink/dishwasher, and a lot of us root for the wife instead of recognizing that the husband may be having a hard time adjusting to his wife's standards.

Great scene and great discussions among the men in the group about how they saw marriage throughout the film.

reply


Don't mind male bonding films but it was hard to enjoy this movie when nearly all the guys were pieces of *beep*. Eddie was an arrogant little twerp, I can't believe he'd find anyone to marry him! When he demanded his mum make him a sandwich I wanted to jump into the movie and smack the s--t through him.

Shrevie was happy to abuse his wife over the order of his records, I mean ok I get people have quirks but there's no need to abuse someone like that over it! Also like she said he never would have abused one of his friends like that.

Boogie was ready to cheat with his friends WIFE! Then Kevin Bacon's character was a drunk who obviously thought he was above having a job. Not many likeable characters apart from Billy!

reply

You have to think that all these characters grew up together, went to the same schools (and synagogues?) and have been hanging out in various places for at least 10 years before we see them in this particular week.
Much of this struck home, even though I'm several years younger than Levinson, am black and grew up in Pittsburgh. But there was a core of us who knew one another from Sunday School or elementary school and who hung out for years at the same two or three bars. Our equivalent of Shrevie got married young, but continued to act as if he were single. Because he and his bride lived close to a bus stop, the rest of us often showed up on their doorstep and invited ourselves in. The missus often found us draped on the couch or hugging the floor, yelling at some football game on TV, guzzling beer, roliing $$#@ or playing the boom box LOUD. In real life, this kind of behavior destroyed the marriage within three years!

"May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?"

reply